Component 1: Operations management – Technology — Eduqas A-Level Business
Test yourself on Component 1: Operations management – Technology with EDUQAS A-Level practice questions.
7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge
Component 1: Operations management – Technology explained
Treat these as four tools with one shared question: does the gain in output and consistency repay the outlay?
Read the full explanation
Information technology runs the data side, so electronic point of sale links a till to automatic reordering, customer records drive targeted marketing, cloud systems let teams work apart, and analytics turn sales history into a forecast. Computer aided design draws and tests a product on screen, cutting prototype costs and shortening time to market. Computer aided manufacture turns that same design file into instructions controlling the machines, and when the two are linked a change to the drawing reaches the cutting head the same day. Robotics takes repetitive, heavy, hazardous or high precision work and runs it to a fixed standard for long hours. Ocado's automated warehouses show both the scale of the gain and the size of the bill.
Evaluate the impact of new technology on the various stakeholders of a business
New technology never lands on a business evenly, and the marks sit in who gains, who loses and over what period. Shareholders usually gain lower unit costs and a stronger return on capital employed, which is operating profit divided by capital employed expressed as a percentage, but only once the outlay is recovered; payback, the initial cost divided by annual net cash inflow, dates that moment in years. Employees meet redundancy, deskilling or retraining, so Kotter and Schlesinger on managing resistance applies. Customers gain speed and price yet lose human contact. Suppliers tied in by electronic data interchange gain certainty and lose bargaining room. Ocado's robotic warehouses show all of these at once, which is why the judgement has to be time framed rather than listed.
Evaluate the importance and impact of technology in the operations of a business
Operations technology covers computer aided design, computer aided manufacture, robotics, electronic point of sale data, inventory software and demand forecasting, and it is assessed through what it does to the numbers. Automation raises labour productivity, which is output divided by the number of employees over a period, lifts capacity utilisation, which is actual output divided by maximum possible output as a percentage, and pushes unit costs down. Against that sit the capital outlay, rising gearing measured as non-current liabilities divided by capital employed as a percentage, depreciation, downtime and obsolescence. Porter's generic strategies frame the judgement: a cost leader gains most, while a craft differentiator can lose the handmade appeal that justifies its price.
Your focus
- Explain how new technology can be used by businesses, including the use of information technology, CAD, CAM and robotics
- Evaluate the impact of new technology on the various stakeholders of a business
- Evaluate the importance and impact of technology in the operations of a business
Component 1: Operations management – Technology exam tips
Marking Points
- Match the tool to the problem in the case, so poor stock accuracy calls for point of sale data while inconsistent welds call for robotics.
- Quantify the benefit where the case allows, in output per hour, scrap rate, lead time or staff hours saved, and set it against the purchase price.
- Appraise the spending rather than asserting it is worthwhile, using payback, the initial outlay divided by the annual net cash inflow, and the average rate of return.
- Deal with the people, since new systems need training, threaten established roles and meet resistance that Kotter and Schlesinger would answer with participation or negotiation.
- Note the running costs and risks: maintenance, obsolescence, downtime when a system fails, and duties over customer data.
- Naming the stakeholder group and the specific technology before the effect, for example robotic picking in a distribution centre rather than technology in general.
- Quantifying the gain where the case gives figures: the fall in unit cost, the rise in capacity utilisation, or the payback period in years on the capital outlay.
- Showing conflict between stakeholders, such as a shareholder gain in return on capital employed that is funded by redundancies among production staff.
- Timing the judgement, weighing short run disruption and training cost against a longer run cost advantage.
- Linking a named technology to an operations measure, for example automated picking raising capacity utilisation or cutting lead time, rather than saying it improves efficiency.
- Using the case figures to recalculate unit cost, labour productivity or capacity utilisation before and after the investment.
- Recognising the finance side, that the purchase raises gearing or consumes cash that had an opportunity cost elsewhere.
- Making the judgement depend on the business: its scale of output, its stage in the product life cycle, and whether its customers value consistency or craft.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Questions usually supply a cost and a forecast saving, so calculate payback before judging whether the investment makes sense.
- 💡Name the specific technology the case supports and stay with it for the whole answer instead of ranging across all four.
- 💡For higher tariff questions, weigh the technology against a cheaper alternative such as training staff or reorganising the layout.
- 💡This is usually a high tariff evaluate question on a case business, so plan two developed stakeholder chains rather than six thin ones.
- 💡The evaluation marks come from a supported judgement, so close by saying which stakeholder group the business should weigh most heavily, given its stated objectives.
- 💡Watch for a case that mentions an investment figure; examiners expect you to use it rather than argue in the abstract.
- 💡Expect a data response carrying an investment cost and a forecast saving, so be ready to work out payback in years and average rate of return as a percentage before you judge.
- 💡Name the model, then say what it is blind to; Porter's generic strategies say nothing about whether the workforce will accept automation.
- 💡Conclude in terms of the firm's own objective, such as survival, growth or margin, not in general terms.
Common Mistakes
- Listing general benefits of technology without naming which technology or what the business in the case actually makes or sells.
- Confusing computer aided design with computer aided manufacture, or merging them without saying which stage each one covers.
- Assuming automation always cuts costs, ignoring the capital charge, the training bill and the years before payback.
- Treating job losses as inevitable, when firms often redeploy staff into maintenance, programming and customer service roles.
- Listing stakeholders with one generic benefit each and never returning to the named business, which caps the answer at knowledge and application.
- Assuming every employee loses, when new technology also creates higher skilled maintenance and data roles; say which staff gain and which lose.
- Treating the technology as free, ignoring the capital cost, the training, the downtime during installation and the speed of obsolescence.
- Confusing capacity utilisation with productivity; the first compares output with what the plant could make, the second compares output with the labour used.
- Claiming technology always cuts costs, without checking whether output is high enough to spread the fixed cost of the machinery over enough units.
- Drifting into marketing or human resource benefits when the question is anchored in operations.