Budgets — Edexcel A-Level Business
Test yourself on Budgets with PEARSON EDEXCEL A-Level practice questions.
7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge
Budgets explained
A budget is an agreed financial plan for a coming period, and its jobs are practical: it turns an objective into money, forces departments to coordinate, shares scarce funds between competing bids, sets the yardstick actual spending is later judged against, and gives each manager authority to spend up to a ceiling. Because the figures are compared with outcomes afterwards, it is also a control and appraisal tool, which is what gives it teeth and also what corrupts it, since a manager judged on a budget has every reason to pad the bid or to spend the remainder in the final month. Targets that are agreed and achievable motivate in the way goal setting theory predicts; targets imposed from above and known to be impossible do the opposite.
b) Types of budget: historical figures; zero based
Incremental budgeting starts from last period and adjusts for inflation, growth or a known change, which is quick, cheap and stable, but it carries forward whatever waste sat in the base and quietly assumes the old allocation was right. The alternative starts every line at nothing and makes each manager justify the spending from scratch, which exposes activities nobody would now fund and moves money towards priorities, at the cost of large amounts of management time and judgements that a marketing department defends more easily than a maintenance team can. The choice turns on the pace of change: a stable firm gains little from the exercise, while one absorbing a merger or facing a cost crisis can gain a great deal.
c) Variance analysis
This compares what was planned with what actually happened, line by line, so managers act on causes rather than on a single profit total. A difference is favourable when it raises profit, meaning revenue above plan or costs below it, and adverse when it lowers profit; the arithmetic is only budget against actual, and the label is decided by the effect on profit rather than by the sign of the number. A supermarket whose wage bill comes in well under plan looks efficient until the cause turns out to be unfilled shifts and lost sales at the tills. Good practice is to investigate the largest differences first, separate causes a manager controlled from a badly set plan or a commodity price shock, and only then change behaviour.
d) Difficulties of budgeting
A budget is an agreed plan for future revenue and spending, so every problem with one starts from forecasting a future nobody can see. Historic budgeting simply uprates last year and carries last year's waste forward, while zero based budgeting forces every pound to be justified and eats management time. Managers who know next year's allocation depends on this year's spending pad their bids or spend the surplus in March, and a target set too tightly demotivates the team expected to hit it. An external shock such as an energy price spike then makes a variance look like poor control when it is really a bad assumption. In a decision, the question is whether the control a budget buys is worth the rigidity and the management time it costs a fast moving business.
Your focus
- a) Purpose of budgets
- b) Types of budget: historical figures; zero based
- c) Variance analysis
Show all 4 objectives
- d) Difficulties of budgeting
Budgets exam tips
Marking Points
- Purposes explained rather than listed: planning, coordination, allocating resources, controlling costs, monitoring performance and motivating managers.
- The budget linked to a stated objective in the case, so it is shown as that aim expressed in money.
- Recognition that budgets delegate authority and create accountability, which is why variance analysis follows from them.
- A balanced comment on motivation, contrasting agreed realistic targets with imposed ones.
- The first approach explained as the previous figures plus an adjustment, with the reason firms use it, speed and low cost.
- The second explained as every item justified from nothing each period, with its benefit of stripping out inherited waste.
- A trade off argued, weighing management time and subjectivity against inertia and entrenched spending.
- A recommendation tied to the circumstances of the firm, such as rapid change, cost pressure or a new division with no spending history.
- The difference defined as budgeted figure against actual figure for the same item and the same period.
- Correct labelling of favourable and adverse, applied properly to revenue lines as well as cost lines.
- Working shown with money units, and expressed as a percentage of budget where the question asks how significant it is.
- A cause traced to something in the extract, with a corrective action proposed or a reason given why the original plan was wrong.
- A named problem plus its consequence: a budget built on an out of date sales forecast produces variances that measure the forecast error rather than the manager's performance.
- Application to the case business, such as a start up with no trading history to base figures on, or a farm whose costs move with the weather.
- A clear distinction between historic and zero based budgeting, and what each costs: inherited inefficiency for the first, management time and expertise for the second.
- Evaluation of whether the problem is fatal or manageable, for example through flexible budgets, rolling monthly budgets or shorter review periods.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Short questions here want the purpose and its consequence for the named firm in a sentence each, not a general essay on finance.
- 💡In longer answers use purpose to frame the judgement: how much budgeting helps this firm depends on how predictable its costs and demand are.
- 💡Comparison questions want a clear line of argument: choose one approach, support it with case data and say what would change your mind.
- 💡Hunt the extract for the clue that settles it, such as unexplained overspending in one department or a budget that has simply grown every year.
- 💡Expect a small table and a short calculation, then a longer question on what the pattern tells the firm about its plan or its managers.
- 💡Always ask whether the cause was controllable; blaming a manager for a commodity price rise earns no evaluation credit.
- 💡This usually arrives as a short analyse question, or as one strand of a twenty mark judgement on whether a business should keep budgeting at all, so develop two points rather than naming five.
- 💡Data response items often give a budgeted and an actual figure; work out the variance, say whether it is favourable or adverse, then use a weakness of budgeting to explain it.
- 💡Keep a sentence for the other side: budgets still coordinate departments and set a benchmark, so the judgement is about how they are used rather than whether they exist.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing a budget with a cash flow forecast or with actual results, when a budget is a plan set before the period starts.
- Asserting that budgets guarantee cost control, ignoring that a manager can overspend and explain it afterwards.
- Leaving out behaviour, so the answer misses padded bids, end of year spending sprees and the demotivation of an imposed figure.
- Describing the justify from scratch approach as setting budgets to nothing or as an automatic cost cut, rather than as a requirement to defend each item.
- Treating the incremental approach as always lazy, when a firm with stable and predictable costs is right to save the effort.
- Offering two definitions with no comparison, which leaves an analyse or evaluate question unanswered.
- Calling every underspend favourable, when cutting training or maintenance stores up larger costs later.
- Reversing the labels, so costs below plan are reported as adverse.
- Stopping at the number, with no cause and no action, which leaves the analysis marks unclaimed.
- Listing problems as a shopping list with no consequence for the business, so the answer stays at knowledge and never reaches analysis.
- Confusing a weakness of budgeting with an adverse variance; the variance is the result, the weakness is why the original figure was wrong.
- Claiming budgets always demotivate, when Herzberg would say involvement in setting the figure builds responsibility and it is the imposed target that demotivates.