This element focuses on equipping early years leaders with the skills to initiate and manage a practitioner-led enquiry aimed at enhancing SEND provision.
Topic Synopsis
This element focuses on equipping early years leaders with the skills to initiate and manage a practitioner-led enquiry aimed at enhancing SEND provision. Learners will understand the cyclical stages of action research, develop the organisational capabilities to lead change, and apply these to a real-world setting. The ultimate goal is to produce evidence-informed improvements that positively impact outcomes for children with SEND.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- The graduated approach: a four-part cycle of Assess, Plan, Do, Review used to identify and support children with SEND, ensuring interventions are tailored and reviewed regularly.
- Statutory duties under the SEND Code of Practice 2015: including the duty to have a SENCO, publish a SEND policy, and use best endeavours to secure special educational provision.
- Person-centred planning: involving the child and their family in decision-making, focusing on the child's strengths, aspirations, and outcomes.
- The role of the SENCO: coordinating SEND provision, leading staff training, liaising with parents and external agencies, and maintaining records.
- Reasonable adjustments: changes to practice, environment, or resources to ensure children with disabilities are not disadvantaged, as required by the Equality Act 2010.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Demonstrate integration of leadership theory (e.g., distributed leadership) with practical change management to strengthen your reflective commentary.
- Ensure your presentation of findings includes visual data representations and a clear narrative that connects the enquiry outcomes to improved SEND provisions.
- Reference relevant legislation and guidance, such as the Children and Families Act 2014 and the EYFS framework, to contextualise your enquiry.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Failing to link the practitioner enquiry to the graduated approach (assess, plan, do, review) as outlined in the SEND Code of Practice.
- Over-reliance on anecdotal evidence without robust data collection tools, leading to weak justification for change.
- Neglecting the ethical implications of involving young children and vulnerable learners in the enquiry process.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for clearly identifying a specific area of SEND provision needing improvement, supported by baseline data and rationale aligned with the SEND Code of Practice (2015).
- Expect evidence of collaborative planning with stakeholders, including parents/carers and multi-agency professionals, as part of the enquiry design.
- Look for a systematic approach to data collection and analysis, using both qualitative and quantitative methods, with ethical considerations addressed (e.g., informed consent, confidentiality).