Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    Content of War and Warfare (J199/23) — OCR GCSE Classical Civilisation

    Test yourself on Content of War and Warfare (J199/23) with OCR GCSE practice questions.

    Start free

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Content of War and Warfare (J199/23) explained

    This topic explores the role of temples in ancient Greek and Roman religion, focusing on their layout, use, and the function of associated officials and rituals.

    Read the full explanation

    It covers specific Greek temples (Parthenon, Temple of Zeus at Olympia) and Roman temples (Temple of Fortuna Virilis, Pantheon), alongside the roles of priests, priestesses, and sacrificial practices.

    What to demonstrate

    1. Understanding of temple layout including the naos/cella and cult statue
    2. Knowledge of the position and function of the altar
    3. Roles and responsibilities of Greek officials (hiereus, hiereia, mantis)
    Show all 7 objectives
    1. Roles and responsibilities of Roman officials (Pontiffs, Pontifex Maximus, Augurs, Vestal Virgins, Haruspex)
    2. Understanding the purpose and process of animal sacrifice
    3. Ability to compare Greek and Roman temple use and religious practices
    4. Knowledge of specific prescribed temples: Parthenon, Temple of Zeus at Olympia, Pantheon, Temple of Fortuna Virilis

    Content of War and Warfare (J199/23) exam tips

    Topic Overview

    The 'Content of War and Warfare' component of OCR GCSE Classical Civilisation (J199/23) explores how the Greeks and Romans conceptualised, experienced, and represented war. You will study a range of literary and visual sources, including Homer's Iliad, Virgil's Aeneid, and historical accounts by authors like Herodotus and Tacitus, alongside archaeological evidence such as the Alexander Mosaic and the Column of Trajan. The topic examines the causes of war, battlefield tactics, the role of leaders and soldiers, and the impact of conflict on civilians and society. Understanding these sources allows you to compare ancient attitudes to war with modern perspectives, highlighting timeless themes of heroism, suffering, and the cost of glory.

    This topic is central to Classical Civilisation because warfare was a defining feature of both Greek and Roman cultures. For the Greeks, the Persian Wars and the Peloponnesian War shaped their identity and political structures, while for Romans, military expansion was the engine of their empire. By analysing primary sources, you will learn to evaluate bias, purpose, and audience—skills essential for the GCSE examination. The topic also connects to other components, such as 'The Homeric World' and 'Roman City Life', as war influenced art, literature, and daily existence.

    To succeed, you must engage with both the content and context of each source. For example, when studying the Iliad, consider how Homer's portrayal of Achilles reflects Greek ideals of honour (kleos) and the brutality of war. Similarly, when analysing the Column of Trajan, think about its function as propaganda and its depiction of Roman military discipline. The examination will test your ability to interpret sources, compare different perspectives, and construct arguments using evidence. Mastery of this topic will not only boost your grade but also deepen your appreciation of how ancient societies understood conflict.

    Key Concepts
    • →Kleos and nostos: In Greek epic, kleos (glory) is the ultimate goal for heroes like Achilles, often achieved through martial prowess, while nostos (homecoming) represents the desire to return from war, as seen in Odysseus' journey.
    • →Pax Romana: The Roman concept of 'Roman peace' justified military expansion as a means to bring stability and civilisation to conquered peoples, though it often involved brutal suppression of resistance.
    • →Propaganda in art and literature: Roman emperors like Trajan used monuments (e.g., Trajan's Column) and historical accounts (e.g., Tacitus' Agricola) to glorify military achievements and legitimise their rule.
    • →Hoplite warfare: The Greek phalanx formation relied on heavily armoured hoplites fighting in close ranks; this system emphasised discipline and collective effort over individual heroism, contrasting with Homeric ideals.
    • →Total war vs. limited war: Ancient wars could be total (e.g., the destruction of Carthage) or limited (e.g., Greek city-state conflicts with set rules), affecting how civilians and soldiers experienced conflict.
    Marking Points
    • Understanding of temple layout including the naos/cella and cult statue
    • Knowledge of the position and function of the altar
    • Roles and responsibilities of Greek officials (hiereus, hiereia, mantis)
    • Roles and responsibilities of Roman officials (Pontiffs, Pontifex Maximus, Augurs, Vestal Virgins, Haruspex)
    • Understanding the purpose and process of animal sacrifice
    • Ability to compare Greek and Roman temple use and religious practices
    • Knowledge of specific prescribed temples: Parthenon, Temple of Zeus at Olympia, Pantheon, Temple of Fortuna Virilis
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Ensure you can identify and describe the key features of the prescribed temples
    • 💡Be prepared to compare the role of priests and priestesses in both cultures
    • 💡Use specific terminology (e.g., naos, cella, hiereus, haruspex) accurately
    • 💡Practice linking visual evidence from temple architecture to the literary descriptions of sacrifice
    • 💡When analysing sources, always consider the author's purpose and audience. For example, Virgil wrote the Aeneid to glorify Augustus' reign, so his depiction of Aeneas as a pious leader is deliberately idealised. Mentioning this context can earn you higher marks.
    • 💡Use precise terminology from the specification, such as 'pathos' (emotional appeal), 'ekphrasis' (vivid description of art), or 'exemplum' (moral example). This shows the examiner you understand the technical language of the course.
    • 💡For the 12-mark 'evaluation' questions, structure your answer with a clear thesis, then discuss two or three sources in detail, comparing their perspectives. Avoid simply describing the sources; instead, explain how they shape our understanding of war.
    Common Mistakes
    • Confusing the roles of specific Greek and Roman religious officials
    • Failing to link the physical layout of the temple to its religious function
    • Generalising religious practices without distinguishing between Greek and Roman contexts
    • Neglecting to use both literary and visual/material evidence in arguments
    • Misconception: All Greek soldiers were hoplites. Correction: While hoplites were dominant, Greek armies also included lighter troops (peltasts), cavalry, and naval forces (triremes), especially in Athens' maritime empire.
    • Misconception: Roman soldiers were invincible. Correction: Rome suffered major defeats (e.g., at Cannae against Hannibal) and adapted tactics over time; their success came from discipline, logistics, and learning from enemies.
    • Misconception: The Iliad is a historical account of the Trojan War. Correction: The Iliad is a poetic epic composed centuries after the supposed events, blending myth, legend, and contemporary values; it reflects 8th-century BC Greek society, not Mycenaean reality.
    Frequently Asked Questions
    What sources do I need to know for the War and Warfare exam?
    You need to study a range of prescribed sources, including Homer's Iliad (Books 1, 6, 22, 24), Virgil's Aeneid (Book 2), and historical texts like Herodotus' Histories (on the Persian Wars) and Tacitus' Agricola. Visual sources include the Alexander Mosaic, the Column of Trajan, and the Prima Porta Augustus. Your exam will test your ability to analyse these sources in detail, so make sure you know their content, context, and purpose.
    How is the War and Warfare exam structured?
    The exam is 1 hour 30 minutes and worth 90 marks. Section A contains short-answer questions on a specific source (e.g., a passage from the Iliad or an image of the Column of Trajan). Section B has two essay-style questions: one comparing two sources (12 marks) and one evaluating a statement using multiple sources (18 marks). You should practice timing: spend about 20 minutes on Section A and 70 minutes on Section B.
    What is the difference between Greek and Roman attitudes to war?
    Greek attitudes, especially in Homer, emphasise individual heroism and the pursuit of kleos (glory), often at the cost of life. War is seen as a means to achieve personal honour. Roman attitudes, by contrast, stress discipline, duty (pietas), and the collective good. Roman writers like Virgil and Livy portray war as a necessary tool for building and maintaining an empire, with success attributed to Roman virtues like courage and perseverance.
    How do I analyse a visual source like the Alexander Mosaic?
    Start by describing what you see: the figures, their poses, and the composition. Then consider the context: the mosaic was found in Pompeii and likely copies a Greek painting. Think about its purpose: it glorifies Alexander by showing him fearless and dominant, while Darius is depicted in chaos. Use technical terms like 'pathos' (Darius' expression) and 'focal point' (Alexander's gaze). Finally, link it to the theme of war: it contrasts Greek heroism with Persian defeat.
    What key battles should I know for this topic?
    You should know the Battle of Marathon (490 BC), where the Athenians defeated the Persians; the Battle of Thermopylae (480 BC), famous for Spartan resistance; and the Battle of Cannae (216 BC), where Hannibal crushed the Romans. For each, understand the tactics, key figures (e.g., Miltiades, Leonidas, Hannibal), and how they are portrayed in sources (e.g., Herodotus on Thermopylae, Polybius on Cannae).
    How can I get top marks in the 18-mark evaluation question?
    To achieve top marks, you must construct a balanced argument that addresses the statement directly. Start with a clear thesis (e.g., 'The sources suggest that war was primarily about glory, but this view is challenged by evidence of suffering'). Then discuss at least three sources in detail, comparing their perspectives. Use precise quotes or descriptions, and explain how each source supports or contradicts the statement. Conclude by weighing the evidence and offering a nuanced judgement.