Planning and Carrying Out Research — OCN London Apprenticeship Assessment Qualification Computer Science Revision
This topic covers the process of planning and carrying out research, including developing a research plan, executing it, and presenting findings while revi
Topic Synopsis
This topic covers the process of planning and carrying out research, including developing a research plan, executing it, and presenting findings while reviewing own skills. Learners will learn to identify research objectives, select appropriate methods, and reflect on their performance.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Digital devices: Understand the difference between input, output, and storage devices, and how they work together in a computer system.
- Online safety: Know how to protect personal data, recognise phishing attempts, and use secure passwords to stay safe online.
- Basic programming: Use block-based programming (e.g., Scratch) to create sequences, loops, and simple animations, understanding the logic behind code.
- Productivity software: Demonstrate competence in using word processors, spreadsheets, and presentation software for tasks like formatting, data entry, and creating charts.
- Digital industries: Identify different sectors within digital industries, such as software development, IT support, and digital marketing, and the skills required for each.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Use SMART criteria to set research objectives.
- Keep a log of research activities to track progress.
- Structure findings with headings and summaries.
- Always align the research plan directly with the assessment criteria; explicitly state how each step will satisfy a specific learning outcome.
- Use a project log or diary to record ongoing reflections and decisions—this provides natural evidence for both execution and review.
- When presenting findings, prioritize clarity over complexity: use visuals and bullet points to highlight key insights for the assessor.
- For the review of skills, link your reflections explicitly to the research process, citing specific instances where you adapted or overcame challenges.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Research aims are too vague or broad.
- Fails to use credible or relevant sources.
- Does not reflect on own performance or skills.
- Vague research objectives that are not clearly defined or measurable, leading to unfocused inquiry.
- Neglecting to document changes to the research plan, resulting in a disconnect between the plan and the final evidence.
- Over-reliance on a single type of source without evaluating credibility, leading to biased or weak findings.
Examiner Marking Points
- Clearly defines research aims and objectives.
- Selects appropriate research methods and sources.
- Follows the research plan systematically.
- Presents findings in a clear, structured format.
- Reviews own skills and identifies areas for improvement.
- Award credit for demonstrating a clear research plan with specific, measurable objectives, proposed data sources, and a realistic timeline.
- Evidence must show the systematic execution of the plan, including accurate data collection, appropriate use of digital tools, and documentation of any adjustments made during the process.
- Assessment should confirm that the presentation of findings is structured logically, uses suitable formats (e.g., reports, slides, infographics), and accurately references sources.