Creating original drama — AQA A-Level Drama and Theatre
Teaching note based on the AQA specification.
Component 2: Creating original drama in AQA A-Level Drama and Theatre requires students to devise and perform an original piece influenced by the methodology of one prescribed theatre practitioner. The assessment combines practical performance or design skills (20 marks) with a comprehensive Working Notebook (40 marks) documenting research, development, and evaluation.
Test yourself on Creating original drama with AQA A-Level practice questions.
Start free
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Your focus
- This subject content is assessed practically.
Which command word is this?
Break down creative decisions, rehearsal discoveries, and theatrical choices into component parts, examining how specific elements (e.g. lighting, physical score) create meaning.
Creating original drama exam tips
Topic Overview
Component 2: Creating original drama is an internally assessed, externally moderated unit that challenges students to become autonomous theatre makers. Working collaboratively in groups of two to six, students choose a stimulus and apply the methodology of an influential practitioner to devise a coherent, compelling piece of original theatre.
This component bridges academic theatrical theory with practical execution, comprising a practical performance or design mark (20 marks) alongside a 60-page or 3,000-word Working Notebook (40 marks). Mastery of this component fosters deep dramaturgical literacy, advanced ensemble collaboration, and rigorous critical analysis essential for higher education and industry practice.
Key Concepts
- →Practitioner Praxis: Integrating the foundational philosophy, rehearsal techniques, and aesthetic conventions of a prescribed practitioner (e.g. Brecht, Artaud, Stanislavski, Kneehigh, Frantic Assembly).
- →Dramaturgy and Structure: Crafting a theatrical narrative utilizing episodic, linear, cyclical, or abstract structures underpinned by semiotics and design elements.
- →The Working Notebook: Producing an analytical, three-part written document covering Research and Development (Section 1), Refining Material (Section 2), and Final Evaluation (Section 3).
- →Semiotic Communication: Employing proxemics, vocal dynamics, physical discipline, and design elements (lighting, sound, set, costume) to convey multi-layered subtext to an audience.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Document failures as well as successes: High-scoring Working Notebooks explicitly dissect failed experiments, explaining why a particular convention did not serve the artistic intention and how it was remediated.
- 💡Use precise technical and theatrical vocabulary consistently: Replace terms like 'made it louder' with 'amplified vocal resonance to communicate dominant status and fracture intimate proxemics'.
- 💡Ensure an even distribution of dramatic weight: In ensemble acting, make sure every student has sufficient individual opportunities to demonstrate vocal, physical, and interpretive range to access top-band marks.
Common Mistakes
- Believing the Working Notebook is an informal diary: Examiners penalize purely descriptive accounts; it must be an analytical portfolio demonstrating academic rigor, theoretical justification, and critical reflection.
- Assuming 'original drama' must be naturalistic: Many students default to soap-opera naturalism; AQA encourages ambitious theatricality, non-linear structures, physical theatre, and bold visual symbolism.
- Treating practitioner style as superficial costume or prop choices: Practitioner influence must dictate rehearsal processes, spatial relationships, vocal cadence, and ideological intention from day one.
Revision Plan
- 1Week 1 (Days 1-3): Deconstruct the chosen stimulus using mind-mapping and thematic brainstorming; conduct deep academic research into the chosen practitioner's core exercises and manifesto.
- 2Week 1 (Days 4-7): Undertake practitioner-led physical/vocal improvisations; immediately record discoveries, sketches, and script fragments in your preliminary Working Notebook drafts.
- 3Week 2 (Days 8-10): Structure the narrative arc; refine transitions, technical design integration, and thematic motifs; collect targeted peer and teacher feedback on dramatic clarity.
- 4Week 2 (Days 11-14): Finalise technical cues and polish performance; complete Working Notebook Section 2 (Refining) and prepare analytical frameworks for post-performance Section 3 (Evaluation).
Exam Question Types
- 📋Devised Performance (Practical Assessment): Live performance in front of an audience/assessor demonstrating vocal, physical, interpretive, or design excellence under examination conditions.
- 📋Working Notebook Section 1 (Research and Development): Assessed portfolio content analyzing the transformation of stimulus to stage through practitioner techniques.
- 📋Working Notebook Section 2 & 3 (Refining and Evaluation): Formative and summative written critique assessing creative decision-making, audience response, and aesthetic success.
Command Word Expectations (AQA)
Analyse
Break down creative decisions, rehearsal discoveries, and theatrical choices into component parts, examining how specific elements (e.g. lighting, physical score) create meaning.
Evaluate
Make reasoned, evidence-based judgments regarding the success of performance choices relative to your original artistic intentions and audience impact.
Apply
Translate theoretical practitioner principles and methodologies directly into practical staging choices, rehearsal exercises, and finished performance conventions.
How Students Lose Marks (Examiner Pitfalls)
Pitfall: Treating practitioner methodology as a cosmetic add-on rather than a structural devising tool.
❌ Weak Answer (Loses Marks):We decided to make our piece Brechtian so we held up placards between scenes and looked at the audience occasionally to make them think about war.
Example improved answer:We utilised Brecht's Verfremdungseffekt by constructing a montaged structure where gestus exposed socio-economic hierarchy. In Scene 3, actor B embodied the capitalist foreman using sharp, repetitive physical gestures denoting industrial machinery, whilst a fractured projection of wage statistics contradicted the dialogue, deliberately breaking theatrical illusion to invite critical spectator appraisal rather than emotional catharsis.
Examiner Tip: Embed your chosen practitioner's ethos into the core dramaturgy and structural conventions from the earliest improvisations, documenting every trial in your Working Notebook.
Pitfall: Narrative-heavy, descriptive Working Notebook entries that lack critical self-evaluation and theatrical vocabulary.
❌ Weak Answer (Loses Marks):In rehearsals this week we practised the argument scene. It went quite well but Chloe forgot her lines so we had to run it again until it felt realistic.
Example improved answer:During exploration of Berkoff's mime and vocal distortion techniques, we identified that our initial naturalistic delivery diminished dramatic tension. We isolated key dialogue lines, applying choral echo and exaggerated facial expression to grotesque effect. This heightened the psychological oppression within the domestic space, fulfilling our artistic intention of exposing suburban conformity, though we noted vocal projection must be refined to preserve diction at high pitches.
Examiner Tip: Structure notebook entries around: Artistic Intention, Practitioner Influence, Practical Exploration, Critical Evaluation, and Refinement.
Step-by-Step Worked Solutions
Question: Working Notebook Section 1 (Research and Developing Ideas): Explain how your chosen practitioner's rehearsal methodologies informed the creation of your initial dramatic material from a selected stimulus.
- 1.Step 1: Define the stimulus and state clear, sophisticated artistic intentions for the performance.
- 2.Step 2: Explicitly link specific theatrical theories or rehearsal exercises of the chosen practitioner (e.g. Stanislavski's units and objectives, Artaud's sensory assault, Frantic Assembly's building blocks).
- 3.Step 3: Detail the practical exploration process, citing specific exercises (e.g. Round-By-Through, emotional memory, gestus) and their immediate theatrical discoveries.
- 4.Step 4: Evaluate how the outcomes shaped the emerging dramatic structure, character relationships, and audience impact.
Final Answer: A high-scoring response establishes a symbiotic relationship between stimulus interpretation and practitioner methodology, illustrating how specific physical or vocal exercises directly generated stylized dramatic conventions rather than standard, unguided improvisation.
Active Recall Memory Test
What are the total marks available for Component 2: Creating original drama in AQA A-Level, and how are they split?
Key Fact: 60 marks total: 20 marks for the practical performance or design execution, and 40 marks for the Working Notebook.
What are the three mandatory sections that must be included in the AQA Working Notebook?
Key Fact: Section 1: Research and developing ideas; Section 2: Refining and amending work; Section 3: Evaluation of the final performance.
What is the maximum word count (or page limit) for the written Working Notebook?
Key Fact: 3,000 words (or 60 pages if structured as a visual/annotated scrapbook with concise text).
Can you combine multiple theatre practitioners within your Component 2 devised piece?
Key Fact: No. AQA requires that the devised piece is influenced by the work and methodologies of ONE single published practitioner.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I be assessed on lighting, sound, set, or costume design instead of acting in Component 2?
Yes. Students can be assessed as designers (lighting, sound, set, or costume) rather than performers. Designer candidates are assessed on their realised designs during the final performance (20 marks) and must submit the same three-section Working Notebook (40 marks) documenting their creative process and practitioner application.
How long must the devised performance be for AQA A-Level?
The time limit depends strictly on group size. For a monologue it is 2 to 3 minutes, duologue 5 to 7 minutes, a group of three 8 to 11 minutes, a group of four 12 to 15 minutes, a group of five 16 to 20 minutes, and a group of six 21 to 25 minutes. Falling short or exceeding these prescribed limits incurs formal mark penalties.
What counts as an acceptable stimulus for Component 2?
AQA permits almost any source material as a starting point. Common stimuli include poems, newspaper articles, political cartoons, paintings, historical events, sculptures, pieces of music, or scientific hypotheses. The key is how deeply your group deconstructs the themes and abstracts them into theatrical concepts.
How important is our chosen practitioner in determining the final grade?
Crucial. Both the practical performance and the Working Notebook are marked on how convincingly and skilfully the chosen practitioner's methodology has been applied. If the performance demonstrates generic drama skills without recognisable practitioner techniques, it cannot access the highest marking bands.
What is the difference between Section 2 and Section 3 of the Working Notebook?
Section 2 focuses on formative refining, documenting how your group cut scenes, adjusted staging, resolved technical hitches, and incorporated feedback during the development process. Section 3 is purely summative evaluation, analyzing the final assessed performance itself and judging how successfully your intentions were communicated to the audience.