This component introduces students to the ways in which language varies depending on the contexts of production and reception. It covers how language choic
Topic Synopsis
This component introduces students to the ways in which language varies depending on the contexts of production and reception. It covers how language choices create personal identities and how language varies over time from c1550 to the present day. Students apply key language frameworks and levels to written, spoken, and multimodal data.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Difference model (Tannen): Men and women have distinct communication styles (e.g., report vs. rapport talk), often leading to cross-gender miscommunication.
- Dominance model (Lakoff, Cameron): Language reflects and reinforces male power; features like tag questions and hedges are seen as markers of female uncertainty but can also signal politeness.
- Performativity (Butler): Gender is not a fixed identity but something we 'do' through repeated linguistic and social acts; language creates gender rather than simply reflecting it.
- Deficit model (Jespersen, Lakoff): Early view that women's language is inferior or 'deficient' compared to men's; now widely criticised as sexist.
- Non-binary and transgender language: Use of singular 'they', neopronouns (e.g., ze/zir), and the importance of respecting chosen names and pronouns as a form of identity affirmation.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Ensure familiarity with the English phonemic reference sheet and transcription mark key provided in the exam
- Use a descriptive approach to evaluate how language choices are affected by social and geographical factors
- Focus on the development of English as a national language and the influences (cultural, social, political, technological) that have changed it over time
- Practice comparative analysis for both 21st-century texts and texts from different historical periods
- Ensure responses are extended and comparative in nature
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Failure to use appropriate linguistic terminology accurately
- Lack of critical evaluation of attitudes towards language
- Inability to synthesise knowledge across different areas of study
- Superficial analysis of contextual factors (mode, field, function, audience)
- Inconsistent application of language frameworks to data
Examiner Marking Points
- Application of concepts relating to language variation to data from different time periods and modes
- Accurate use and application of linguistic terminology
- Critical evaluation of attitudes towards language and its users
- Analysis of how mode, field, function, and audience affect language choices
- Synthesis of language knowledge drawn from different areas of study
- Analysis of historical, geographical, social, and individual varieties of English
- Evaluation of the effect of language variation over time across frameworks (graphology, phonology, morphology, syntax, lexis, semantics, discourse)