A study of how gender might affect language choices, forming part of the Language and Identity non-exam assessment (NEA). Learners use their knowledge of l
Topic Synopsis
A study of how gender might affect language choices, forming part of the Language and Identity non-exam assessment (NEA). Learners use their knowledge of language levels, concepts, and issues to explore and interpret gender-related linguistic phenomena.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- **Sex vs. Gender:** Understanding the crucial distinction between 'sex' (biological characteristics) and 'gender' (social and cultural construction of identity) is fundamental to all theories in this field.
- **Deficit Model:** Early theories (e.g., Robin Lakoff) suggesting women's language is inherently weaker or deficient compared to men's, often linking it to social subordination.
- **Dominance Model:** Theories (e.g., Dale Spender, Pamela Fishman) arguing that observed differences in language use reflect and reinforce male dominance and power in society.
- **Difference Model:** Theories (e.g., Deborah Tannen) proposing that men and women use language differently due to distinct subcultures and socialisation, leading to 'miscommunication' rather than one being superior.
- **Diversity/Performativity Model:** Contemporary approaches (e.g., Judith Butler, Deborah Cameron) that reject universal gendered language patterns, emphasising individual variation, context, and the idea that gender is 'performed' through language and other social acts, rather than being a fixed identity.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Ensure the investigation is independent and sustained, focusing on a specific aspect of language and gender
- Use appropriate linguistic theory to inform the study
- Maintain a clear record of the progress of work and submission of drafts
- Ensure the investigation is grounded in data collection and interrogation
- Adopt an academic style throughout the 2500-3500 word folder
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Exceeding the advisory word count, leading to a lack of precision and focus
- Submitting work that is too short, failing to provide appropriate coverage of assessment objectives
- Failure to clearly acknowledge references to linguists' work or other sources
- Inconsistent overview and generalised evaluation of contextual factors
- Limited discussion of relevant issues or failure to cite sufficient examples
Examiner Marking Points
- Application of appropriate methods of language analysis
- Use of associated linguistic terminology
- Coherent written expression and academic style
- Demonstration of critical understanding of concepts and issues relevant to language use
- Analysis and evaluation of how contextual factors and language features are associated with the construction of meaning
- Independent research, data collection, and interpretation
- Synthesis of insights developed through linguistic knowledge
- Accurate references to texts and sources