This element critically examines contrasting models of disability, primarily the medical and social models, exploring their theoretical foundations and pra
Topic Synopsis
This element critically examines contrasting models of disability, primarily the medical and social models, exploring their theoretical foundations and practical implications. Learners evaluate how these frameworks shape personal identity, lived experience, and service delivery, gaining insight into person-centered support that upholds rights and promotes inclusion.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Person-centred planning: Tailoring support to the individual's preferences, goals, and communication needs, using tools like one-page profiles or person-centred reviews.
- Social vs medical model of disability: The medical model views disability as a problem to be fixed, while the social model identifies societal barriers as the main disabling factor; support should focus on removing barriers.
- Mental Capacity Act 2005: Five key principles (assumption of capacity, best interests, least restrictive option, etc.) guide decision-making for individuals who may lack capacity; capacity assessments must be decision-specific.
- Positive behaviour support (PBS): A proactive approach to understanding challenging behaviour as communication, using functional assessments to develop strategies that improve quality of life.
- Multi-agency working: Collaboration between health, social care, education, and voluntary sectors to provide holistic support, with clear roles and information sharing protocols.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- In written assessments, always link each model to a specific case study or practice example, demonstrating the tangible effects on an individual's experience and care planning.
- Use precise language: refer to 'persons with impairments' when discussing the social model, and explain how language reflects underlying attitudes and shapes service provision.
- When evaluating service delivery, reference relevant legislation (e.g., Equality Act 2010) or policy frameworks (e.g., personalisation) to show how the social model informs rights-based and inclusive support.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Confusing the medical model with the biopsychosocial model, or assuming that any reference to impairment automatically aligns with the medical perspective.
- Believing that the social model denies the reality of impairment, rather than understanding it separates impairment (bodily) from disability (social oppression).
- Failing to apply the models to real-world scenarios, resulting in vague or theoretical responses without concrete examples of impact on identity or service delivery.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for clearly distinguishing between the medical model (disability as individual deficit) and the social model (disability as societal barriers), using accurate terminology and relevant examples.
- Award credit for explaining how adopting the social model can empower an individual, fostering a positive disability identity, while the medical model may lead to internalized stigma and reduced self-esteem.
- Award credit for analyzing how service delivery shifts from a clinical, impairment-focused approach under the medical model to a holistic, barrier-removing approach under the social model, with reference to current practice or legislation.