Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    Paper 3, Option 38.2: The making of modern China, 1860–1997 - 2 Ideologies and individuals behind economic growth — Edexcel A-Level History

    Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.

    Paper 3, Option 38.2: The making of modern China, 1860–1997 - 2 Ideologies and individuals behind economic growth explained

    Paper 3, Option 38.2: The making of modern China, 1860–1997 - 2 Ideologies and individuals behind economic growth covers 2 specification points, including The Self-Strengthening Movement of the 1860s… and Li Honghzhang, Sheng Xuanhuai, Sung Tzu- wen….

    Read the full explanation

    Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.

    Ideas and ideologies as factors promoting change, 1860– 1997 (key developments: the Self-Strengthening Movement of the 1860s and 70s, the cult of science and rejection of traditional values in the May Fourth Movement 1915–24, Marxism and the Soviet inspired cult of heavy industry in the early 1950s, modifying soviet Marxism and ‘walking on two legs’ 1958, the embrace of capitalism in the 1980s and 90s).

    This theme examines how ideas and ideologies drove economic change from 1860 to 1997. The Self-Strengthening Movement of the 1860s and 70s sought reform through adopting Western technology while preserving Chinese values. The May Fourth Movement (1915–24) promoted a cult of science and rejected traditional values, encouraging modernisation. In the early 1950s, Marxism and a Soviet-inspired cult of heavy industry shaped planned development. By 1958, Mao modified Soviet Marxism through 'walking on two legs', balancing industry and agriculture. Finally, the 1980s and 90s saw an embrace of capitalism and market mechanisms. Assess how far each ideology actually promoted change.

    The roles of individuals in promoting economic growth, 1860–1997: Li Honghzhang, Sheng Xuanhuai, Sung Tzu- wen [TV Soong], Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaping (key developments: the establishment of the first modern bank in China 1897, the China Development Finance Corporation in the 1930s, the Great Leap Forward 1958–61, the launch of the Four Modernisations 1978).

    Study how five figures shaped economic growth across 1860–1997. Li Hongzhang backed self-strengthening ventures such as shipping and mines. Sheng Xuanhuai drove railways, telegraphs and the first modern bank in China, 1897. Sung Tzu-wen [TV Soong] used finance ministry and business links, and the China Development Finance Corporation in the 1930s, to fund industry. Mao Zedong collectivised agriculture and industry, with the Great Leap Forward 1958–61 as a costly push. Deng Xiaoping launched the Four Modernisations in 1978, opening trade and special zones. Compare aims, methods, resources and results, and judge how far each individual, rather than wider forces, promoted growth.

    Your focus

    1. Describe the key ideologies that influenced Chinese economic development from 1860 to 1997.
    2. Explain how each ideology promoted or constrained economic change in its period.
    3. Evaluate the extent to which ideas, rather than other factors, drove economic transformation.
    Show all 6 objectives
    1. Describe the economic role of each named individual and the four key developments.
    2. Compare how far individuals, rather than wider forces, promoted economic growth across 1860–1997.
    3. Evaluate the significance of the Great Leap Forward 1958–61 and the Four Modernisations 1978 for growth.

    Paper 3, Option 38.2: The making of modern China, 1860–1997 - 2 Ideologies and individuals behind economic growth exam tips

    Marking Points
    • Explains the Self-Strengthening Movement of the 1860s and 70s as selective adoption of Western technology within Confucian frameworks.
    • Analyses the May Fourth Movement (1915–24) as promoting science and rejecting traditional values to foster modernisation.
    • Examines early 1950s Marxism and Soviet-inspired heavy industry as ideological drivers of planned economic growth.
    • Assesses the 1958 modification of Soviet Marxism through 'walking on two legs' as a distinct Chinese approach.
    • Evaluates the embrace of capitalism in the 1980s and 90s as an ideological shift promoting market-led change.
    • Explains Li Hongzhang's role in self-strengthening industrial and military ventures and how far these promoted growth.
    • Explains Sheng Xuanhuai's role in railways, telegraphs and the first modern bank in China, 1897, and its economic significance.
    • Explains Sung Tzu-wen [TV Soong] and the China Development Finance Corporation in the 1930s as a mechanism for financing industry.
    • Explains Mao Zedong's economic programme, including the Great Leap Forward 1958–61, and its mixed consequences for growth.
    • Explains Deng Xiaoping's launch of the Four Modernisations 1978 and subsequent opening policies as a growth stimulus.
    • Compares individuals across the period, weighing personal agency against structural factors such as war, foreign pressure and institutions.
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Link each ideology to specific economic outcomes or policies to show causal impact.
    • 💡Use dates precisely, especially 1915–24, 1953–57 and 1958, to structure your argument.
    • 💡Compare ideologies directly, for example Self-Strengthening conservatism against 1980s market embrace.
    • 💡Anchor every claim to a named individual and a dated development from the specification.
    • 💡Use comparison language such as 'more significant than' or 'to a lesser extent' to address the roles of individuals directly.
    • 💡Plan by individual or by theme, then ensure the conclusion weighs individual agency against wider economic forces.
    Common Mistakes
    • Treating the Self-Strengthening Movement as full Westernisation; correct this by stressing its aim to preserve Chinese core values.
    • Assuming May Fourth ideas immediately transformed the economy; correct this by noting their gradual and indirect influence.
    • Confusing 'walking on two legs' with pure Soviet Marxism; correct this by explaining it as a modified, balanced approach.
    • Treating each individual in isolation rather than comparing their methods and results across 1860–1997; correct by grouping them by approach, for example state-led industrialisation versus market opening.
    • Assuming the Great Leap Forward 1958–61 produced sustained growth; correct by noting its severe economic disruption alongside any industrial aims.
    • Confusing the China Development Finance Corporation in the 1930s with later Deng-era institutions; correct by dating and naming each body precisely.