Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    The Spanish Civil War, 1936–39 — Edexcel A-Level History

    Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.

    The Spanish Civil War, 1936–39 explained

    The Spanish Civil War, 1936–39 covers 4 specification points, including Nationalist and Republican leadership, support… and The main campaigns and stages of the….

    Read the full explanation

    Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.

    Spain at the outbreak of war July–August 1936: Nationalist and Republican leadership, support and relative military strength; the geographical division of the country; the significance of the international response; the situation by the end of August.

    The July 1936 coup split Spain. Nationalists held the rural north-west, south and Morocco, supported by conservative Catholics and Carlists, led by the Junta de Defensa Nacional. Republicans kept Madrid and industrial regions, supported by workers and socialists, lacking a single leader. Militarily, Nationalists had trained regulars and German/Italian airlift support; Republicans had more men but fewer weapons and no unified staff. Geographically, Nationalists held grain; Republicans held industry and gold. Internationally, French hesitation, British non-intervention and German/Italian aid to Nationalists shaped the early war. By late August 1936, Nationalists advanced on Madrid while the Republic reorganised.

    The course of the war: the main campaigns and stages of the Nationalist advance; the impact of Republican political divisions; the impact of atrocities by both sides; the fall of Barcelona and Madrid in 1939.

    The war moved through clear stages. In 1936 the Nationalists advanced from the south towards Madrid, failing to take the city, then shifted to the northern campaign, capturing the Basque country and Asturias in 1937. The 1938 Aragon offensive reached the Mediterranean, splitting Republican territory, and the Ebro offensive failed to restore the position. Republican political divisions between communists, socialists, anarchists and POUM weakened the war effort, culminating in the Barcelona May Days of 1937. Atrocities occurred on both sides, including the massacre at Badajoz and the bombing of Guernica, and Republican violence against clergy and Nationalist reprisals after capture. Barcelona fell in January 1939 and Madrid in March 1939, ending organised resistance.

    Life during the war: the variety of experiences in the Republican zones; life in the Nationalist zone; attitudes towards women; the use of political terror.

    Life during the Spanish Civil War varied drastically. In Republican zones, experiences ranged from radical anarchist collectivisation in Catalonia to strict centralised control in Madrid. Conversely, life in the Nationalist zone featured rigid authoritarianism, martial law, and traditional Catholic values. Attitudes towards women diverged sharply: Republicans offered new freedoms, symbolised by the Mujeres Libres and female militia fighters, whereas Nationalists enforced traditional domestic roles via the Sección Femenina. Both sides used political terror. Nationalist terror was systematic and state-sanctioned, targeting leftists, while Republican terror often involved spontaneous, anti-clerical violence by local militias.

    Reasons for Nationalist victory: Republican weaknesses; Nationalist strengths; the role of Franco; the role of foreign intervention and the impact of non-intervention.

    Nationalist victory stemmed from internal cohesion and external support. Nationalist strengths included a unified command and professional forces like the Army of Africa. Franco's role was crucial; he merged disparate right-wing groups into a single political entity. Conversely, Republican weaknesses featured severe internal divisions, seen in the 1937 May Days, and a lack of centralised military control. Foreign intervention was decisive: German and Italian support gave the Nationalists vital air superiority. Meanwhile, the impact of non-intervention severely disadvantaged the Republic, denying them arms from Western democracies and forcing a reliance on Soviet aid, which exacerbated internal political fractures.

    Your focus

    1. Describe the leadership, support and relative military strength of both sides in July–August 1936.
    2. Explain how geography divided Spain and how that division affected resources and strategy.
    3. Evaluate the significance of the international response and the situation by the end of August 1936.
    Show all 12 objectives
    1. Describe the main campaigns and stages of the Nationalist advance from 1936 to 1939.
    2. Explain how Republican political divisions and atrocities by both sides affected the course of the war.
    3. Evaluate the significance of the fall of Barcelona and Madrid in 1939 for the outcome of the conflict.
    4. Analyse the differing social and political experiences within the Republican and Nationalist zones.
    5. Compare the contrasting attitudes towards women and their societal roles across the two factions.
    6. Evaluate the methods, motivations, and scale of political terror employed by both the Republicans and Nationalists.
    7. Evaluate the internal political and military strengths of the Nationalists, including Franco's leadership.
    8. Analyse the structural and political weaknesses that undermined the Republican war effort.
    9. Assess the impact of foreign intervention and the Non-Intervention Agreement on the outcome of the civil war.

    The Spanish Civil War, 1936–39 exam tips

    Marking Points
    • Explains Nationalist leadership and support: divided command under the Junta de Defensa Nacional, backed by conservative Catholics, landowners, Carlists and the Falange.
    • Explains Republican leadership and support: fragmented government backed by workers, trade unions (UGT/CNT), socialists, communists and regionalists.
    • Compares military strength: Army of Africa and airlift versus Republican numbers but shortages of weapons and training.
    • Analyses geographical division: Nationalist agrarian north-west and south against Republican industrial Catalonia, Madrid and the Basque north.
    • Assesses international response: French hesitation, British non-intervention stance, and crucial German and Italian airlift intervention.
    • Judges the position by end of August: Nationalist advance from Seville towards Madrid, Republican resistance and reorganisation.
    • Sequences the main campaigns: Madrid, the northern campaign, Aragon and the Ebro, showing how the Nationalist advance developed.
    • Explains how Republican political divisions, including the Barcelona May Days, undermined unity and military effectiveness.
    • Analyses atrocities by both sides, such as Badajoz and Guernica, and their impact on morale and international opinion.
    • Explains the fall of Barcelona in January 1939 and Madrid in March 1939 as the end of organised Republican resistance.
    • Links military stages to political and international factors rather than narrating events without analysis.
    • Contrast the decentralised, revolutionary nature of early Republican zones with the unified, militaristic administration of Nationalist areas.
    • Evaluate the role of Mujeres Libres in advancing women's rights in Republican areas versus the conservative Sección Femenina in Nationalist zones.
    • Analyse the systematic nature of the Nationalist 'White Terror' as a tool for political consolidation, noting purges of teachers and unionists.
    • Assess the 'Red Terror' in Republican zones, noting its often spontaneous nature and specific targeting of the Catholic clergy and perceived fascists.
    • Evaluate Franco's political skill in unifying the Carlists and Falangists through the 1937 Decree of Unification to create a cohesive Nationalist front.
    • Analyse Republican weaknesses, specifically the debilitating infighting between anarchists, communists, and socialists during the Barcelona May Days.
    • Assess the decisive military impact of foreign intervention, such as the German Condor Legion and Italian CTV, on Nationalist operational success.
    • Examine how the Non-Intervention Agreement disproportionately harmed the Republic by blocking democratic aid while failing to stop fascist intervention.
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Anchor answers on the named categories: leadership, support, military strength, geography, international response and the August position.
    • 💡Use precise dates and places, such as the Morocco airlift in July 1936 and the advance towards Madrid in August.
    • 💡Organise answers by stage or theme, such as advance, divisions, atrocities and final collapse, to keep chronology clear.
    • 💡Use specific campaigns and dates to support analysis of why the Nationalists gained the advantage.
    • 💡Balance military, political and humanitarian factors when judging the course of the war.
    • 💡Use specific terminology like colectividades and milicianas to demonstrate precise knowledge of the Republican social revolution.
    • 💡When evaluating political terror, compare the motivations and centralisation of the violence rather than just the estimated death tolls.
    • 💡Link the differing attitudes towards women directly to the underlying ideologies of the Republic and the Nationalists.
    • 💡Weigh the relative importance of different factors; argue whether internal Republican divisions or external fascist support was the primary catalyst for Nationalist victory.
    • 💡Use the 1937 Decree of Unification as concrete evidence of Franco's political pragmatism and leadership strength.
    • 💡When discussing non-intervention, explicitly mention the Non-Intervention Committee and its failure to enforce the arms embargo on Germany and Italy.
    Common Mistakes
    • Treating the coup as instantly successful or instantly defeated; correct by explaining it produced a divided Spain and a prolonged war.
    • Assuming the Republic had superior armed forces because it held more people; correct by noting shortages of rifles, officers and unified command.
    • Including Soviet military aid in the July-August 1936 timeframe; correct by noting Soviet supplies did not arrive until October 1936, whereas German and Italian aid began in July.
    • Claiming Franco had unified command in July 1936; correct by noting the Junta de Defensa Nacional led the Nationalists until late September.
    • Narrating campaigns without linking them to the Nationalist advance or Republican weakness; correct by explaining consequences for each side.
    • Treating atrocities as one-sided; correct by giving examples from both Nationalist and Republican zones and assessing their effects.
    • Confusing the dates of the fall of Barcelona and Madrid; correct by placing Barcelona in January 1939 and Madrid in March 1939.
    • Error: Assuming Republican zones had a uniform political and social experience. Correction: Emphasise the deep divisions and varied experiences, such as anarchist collectivisation in Barcelona versus communist centralisation in Madrid.
    • Error: Claiming women in Nationalist zones had no political organisations. Correction: Note that while their roles were restricted to traditional domestic spheres, they were organised through the Falangist Sección Femenina.
    • Error: Equating the structure of political terror on both sides. Correction: Distinguish between the systematic, top-down Nationalist terror and the largely decentralised, often spontaneous Republican terror.
    • Error: Stating that the Republic received no foreign aid. Correction: Clarify that the Republic received significant aid from the USSR and the International Brigades, though it was less consistent than fascist aid to the Nationalists.
    • Error: Attributing Nationalist victory solely to foreign intervention. Correction: Balance external factors with internal Nationalist strengths, such as Franco's leadership and the professional Army of Africa.
    • Error: Treating the Republican forces as a unified military entity. Correction: Highlight the fragmented nature of the Republican militias and the political struggles over creating a unified Popular Army.