Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    The League of Nations and international peace — AQA GCSE History

    Test yourself on The League of Nations and international peace with AQA GCSE practice questions.

    Start free

    7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge

    The League of Nations and international peace explained

    This topic examines the formation, structure, and effectiveness of the League of Nations in the inter-war period, including its successes and failures in maintaining international peace, the impact of the Great Depression, and the crises in Manchuria and Abyssinia that led to its collapse.

    What to demonstrate

    1. Formation and covenant of the League of Nations
    2. Organisation and membership changes
    3. Powers of the League
    Show all 10 objectives
    1. Work of the League's agencies
    2. Successes in the 1920s (Aaland Islands, Upper Silesia, Vilna, Corfu, Bulgaria)
    3. Diplomacy outside the League (Locarno treaties, Kellogg-Briand Pact)
    4. Impact of the Great Depression on the League
    5. Manchurian crisis and its consequences
    6. Abyssinian crisis and its consequences
    7. Failure of the League to avert war in 1939

    The League of Nations and international peace exam tips

    Topic Overview

    The League of Nations was established after World War I as part of the Treaty of Versailles, with the aim of maintaining world peace and preventing future conflicts. It was the first international organisation of its kind, embodying the ideal of collective security—the principle that an attack on one member would be considered an attack on all, prompting a united response. The League's creation reflected the widespread desire to avoid the horrors of another war, but its effectiveness was hampered from the start by the absence of key powers like the USA, which never joined, and the exclusion of Germany and the USSR initially.

    The League's structure included the Assembly (all members), the Council (major powers), and the Secretariat (civil service). It also had agencies like the International Labour Organisation and the Permanent Court of International Justice. The League achieved some successes in the 1920s, such as resolving disputes between Sweden and Finland over the Aaland Islands (1921) and between Greece and Bulgaria (1925), and its humanitarian work (e.g., refugee repatriation, fighting disease) was notable. However, it failed to prevent aggression by major powers in the 1930s—Japan's invasion of Manchuria (1931), Italy's invasion of Abyssinia (1935), and Hitler's remilitarisation of the Rhineland (1936)—which exposed its weaknesses: lack of an army, reliance on unanimous decisions, and economic sanctions that were easily ignored.

    Understanding the League of Nations is crucial for GCSE History because it explains why the world failed to prevent World War II. It also highlights the challenges of international cooperation and the limitations of collective security without enforcement power. The League's failures directly led to the creation of the United Nations after WWII, which learned from its predecessor's mistakes. For students, this topic demonstrates how historical events are interconnected and how the desire for peace can be undermined by national self-interest and lack of commitment.

    Key Concepts
    • →Collective security: The idea that all member nations would act together to preserve peace, but it failed because members prioritised their own interests.
    • →The League's weaknesses: No army, unanimous voting required, absence of major powers (USA, USSR initially, Germany until 1926), and slow decision-making.
    • →Successes in the 1920s: The League resolved minor disputes (e.g., Aaland Islands, Upper Silesia) and did humanitarian work (e.g., refugee camps, fighting leprosy).
    • →Failures in the 1930s: The Manchurian Crisis (1931) and Abyssinian Crisis (1935) showed the League's inability to stop aggressive powers, as sanctions were ineffective and members like Britain and France prioritised appeasement.
    • →The League's impact on the UN: The UN learned from the League's mistakes by giving the Security Council power to enforce decisions and requiring all five permanent members to agree.
    Marking Points
    • Formation and covenant of the League of Nations
    • Organisation and membership changes
    • Powers of the League
    • Work of the League's agencies
    • Successes in the 1920s (Aaland Islands, Upper Silesia, Vilna, Corfu, Bulgaria)
    • Diplomacy outside the League (Locarno treaties, Kellogg-Briand Pact)
    • Impact of the Great Depression on the League
    • Manchurian crisis and its consequences
    • Abyssinian crisis and its consequences
    • Failure of the League to avert war in 1939
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Ensure you can explain how the League's structure and membership affected its ability to act.
    • 💡Be prepared to evaluate the League's successes in the 1920s against its failures in the 1930s.
    • 💡Understand the specific impact of the Great Depression on international relations and the League's authority.
    • 💡Focus on the causal links between the Manchurian and Abyssinian crises and the eventual collapse of the League.
    • 💡Use specific examples: When discussing successes or failures, always name the crisis (e.g., Manchuria, Abyssinia) and explain why the League succeeded or failed. This shows detailed knowledge.
    • 💡Link to wider context: Explain how the League's weaknesses connect to the rise of dictators in the 1930s and the outbreak of WWII. Examiners reward analysis that shows cause and effect.
    • 💡Evaluate the League's impact: Don't just list facts—judge its overall effectiveness. A balanced conclusion that acknowledges both achievements and failures will score higher marks.
    Common Mistakes
    • Misconception: The League of Nations was a total failure. Correction: While it failed to prevent WWII, it had successes in the 1920s, such as settling disputes and improving global health and labour conditions.
    • Misconception: The League had its own army. Correction: The League had no military force; it relied on member nations to provide troops, which they were reluctant to do.
    • Misconception: The USA was a key member. Correction: The USA never joined the League, despite President Wilson's role in creating it, because the US Senate refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles.
    Frequently Asked Questions
    Why did the League of Nations fail to stop World War II?
    The League failed mainly because it lacked enforcement power—it had no army, and economic sanctions were easily ignored by aggressive nations like Japan and Italy. Key members like Britain and France prioritised appeasement to avoid war, and the USA never joined, weakening the League's authority. The Great Depression also made countries focus on their own problems, reducing their willingness to act collectively. These failures allowed dictators to expand unchecked, leading to WWII.
    What were the successes of the League of Nations?
    The League had several successes in the 1920s, including resolving the Aaland Islands dispute (1921) between Sweden and Finland, and the Greek-Bulgarian border incident (1925). It also did valuable humanitarian work, such as repatriating prisoners of war, fighting diseases like leprosy and malaria, and improving labour conditions through the International Labour Organisation. These achievements show that the League could work effectively for smaller issues, but it struggled with major powers.
    Why didn't the USA join the League of Nations?
    The USA did not join because the US Senate refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles, which included the League's covenant. Many Americans were isolationist and feared being dragged into future European wars. President Wilson campaigned for membership but suffered a stroke, and the Senate voted against it. Without the USA, the League lacked a major economic and military power, which significantly weakened its ability to enforce decisions.
    How did the League of Nations try to keep peace in the 1920s?
    The League used several methods: moral condemnation (naming and shaming aggressors), economic sanctions (cutting trade), and arbitration (settling disputes through negotiation). In the 1920s, these worked for smaller conflicts, like the Aaland Islands and Upper Silesia. The League also promoted disarmament through conferences, though with limited success. Its humanitarian work helped build international cooperation, but it lacked the military force to back up its decisions.
    What was the difference between the League of Nations and the United Nations?
    The UN learned from the League's failures. Unlike the League, the UN has a Security Council with five permanent members (USA, UK, France, Russia, China) who can veto decisions, and it can authorise military action through peacekeeping forces. The UN also requires all members to contribute to enforcement, whereas the League relied on voluntary action. The UN's structure is stronger, but it still faces challenges like the League did, especially when permanent members disagree.
    How did the Manchurian Crisis show the League's weaknesses?
    In 1931, Japan invaded Manchuria (northeast China). The League condemned Japan but took no real action because Japan was a major power and League members like Britain and France were more concerned with their own interests. The League sent the Lytton Commission, which took a year to report, and Japan simply left the League. This showed that the League was slow, lacked an army, and could not stop a determined aggressor, especially when that aggressor was a permanent member of the Council.