This element equips learners to support speech, language and communication (SLC) development in children and young people learning more than one language.
Topic Synopsis
This element equips learners to support speech, language and communication (SLC) development in children and young people learning more than one language. It emphasises holistic, culturally informed assessment to differentiate between language differences and genuine SLC disorders, and promotes effective partnership with parents and other professionals to create an inclusive support environment.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Stages of typical speech, language, and communication development from 0-19 years, including pre-linguistic, single words, two-word phrases, and complex sentences.
- The difference between speech (articulation and phonology), language (vocabulary and grammar), and communication (pragmatics and social use).
- Factors affecting SLC development, such as hearing impairment, autism, learning disabilities, and environmental factors like poverty or lack of language exposure.
- Strategies to support SLC, including modelling, repetition, visual supports (e.g., Makaton, PECS), and creating a communication-friendly environment.
- The role of the speech and language therapist (SaLT) and how to implement their recommendations in daily practice.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Refer to recognised frameworks like the Speech, Language and Communication Framework (SLCF) to demonstrate professional knowledge.
- When answering scenario-based questions, always consider the child's first language context and the importance of a bilingual assessment approach.
- Highlight the value of parent partnerships; use phrases like 'co-production' and 'culturally sensitive practice' to show advanced understanding.
- If asked about working with others, explicitly mention safeguarding procedures and the need for consent when involving interpreters or other professionals.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Assuming that learning two languages causes speech or language delay.
- Applying monolingual assessment norms to bilingual children, leading to over- or under-identification of needs.
- Overlooking cultural variations in communication styles, such as eye contact or turn-taking, and misinterpreting them as difficulties.
- Failing to involve parents in the assessment process, missing vital information about the child's language environment and development.
- Not differentiating between a child's limited English proficiency and an actual language disorder.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for demonstrating an understanding of typical bilingual language development and how it differs from monolingual milestones.
- Criteria met when the learner identifies culturally appropriate assessment tools and explains the role of interpreters/translators, if needed.
- Evidence should show the ability to engage parents sensitively, gathering detailed case histories that consider the child's exposure to each language.
- Assessor looks for clear differentiation between language difference (due to EAL) and indicators of speech, language or communication disorders.
- Credit awarded for outlining effective interprofessional collaboration, such as working with SLC therapists, bilingual co-workers, and external agencies.