Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    Radioactive contamination — AQA GCSE Physics

    Test yourself on Radioactive contamination with AQA GCSE practice questions.

    Start free

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Radioactive contamination explained

    Contamination means the radioactive material itself has ended up somewhere it should not be: on a bench, on skin, on clothing, or inside a body after being swallowed or breathed in.

    Read the full explanation

    The atoms are transferred, not just the radiation they give out. That is the whole distinction from irradiation, where the source stays where it is and only the radiation reaches the object. A contaminated object carries a source that keeps decaying wherever it goes, so moving away from the original source does not help. It is why a teacher wearing polythene gloves to handle a radioactive sample is protected from contamination, even though the gloves do nothing to stop the hands being irradiated by the radiation passing through them.

    The hazard from contamination is due to the decay of the contaminating atoms.

    Contamination is hazardous because the atoms that have been transferred go on decaying exactly where they have landed. Every decay happens in contact with, or inside, living tissue, so the ionising radiation is absorbed by cells rather than by the air or by clothing. This flips the usual ranking of danger. Outside the body alpha radiation is almost harmless because its low penetrating power means skin stops it, but inside the body that same alpha radiation is absorbed by tissue and organs and, being highly ionising, does a great deal of damage in a small volume. The extra dose raises the chance of damage to cells, DNA and genes, and so of mutations or cancer. The hazard lasts as long as the contaminating atoms keep decaying.

    The type of radiation emitted affects the level of hazard.

    Alpha, beta and gamma differ in two opposite ways and the hazard depends on which one matters in a given situation. Ionising power runs alpha, then beta, then gamma: an alpha particle is large and doubly charged, so it rips electrons from atoms quickly and gives up all its energy within a few centimetres of air. Penetrating power runs the other way: alpha is stopped by paper or skin, beta by a few millimetres of aluminium, and gamma is only reduced by thick lead or concrete. Outside the body a gamma source is the greater hazard because the radiation reaches internal organs. Inside the body an alpha source is far worse, because all that ionisation happens inside a small volume of living tissue.

    Irradiation is the process of exposing an object to nuclear radiation.

    Irradiation is being exposed to radiation from a source that stays outside the object. The source is separate; nothing is transferred. Radiation travels from it, some is absorbed by the object, and the moment the source is removed or shielded, the exposure stops. That is the crucial practical difference from contamination, where the material has moved onto or into the object and keeps decaying there. Irradiation is used deliberately: gamma sources sterilise surgical instruments and food by killing bacteria, and radiotherapy beams irradiate a tumour to destroy unwanted tissue. The exposure is controlled by time, distance and shielding, which is why sources are kept in lead-lined boxes and handled at arm's length with tongs.

    The irradiated object does not become radioactive.

    For the alpha, beta and gamma sources used at GCSE, irradiating an object does not make it radioactive. Radiation passing through matter ionises atoms, knocking electrons out of them, but it leaves the nuclei unchanged. Radioactivity comes from unstable nuclei, so if no new unstable nuclei are created the object cannot become a source. As soon as the radioactive source is removed or shielded, the object emits nothing and can be handled safely. This is exactly why gamma irradiation is used to sterilise surgical instruments and food: the radiation kills bacteria as it passes through the sealed packet, then the contents are inert. Contamination is different, because there the source material itself is now sitting on or in the object.

    Students should be able to compare the hazards associated with contamination and irradiation.

    Comparing the two hazards needs three contrasts. First, what is present: irradiation is exposure to radiation, contamination is the unwanted presence of radioactive material on or inside a person or object. Second, duration: irradiation stops when the source is removed or shielded, while contamination keeps delivering a dose for as long as the transferred atoms go on decaying, which for a long half-life can be years. Third, which radiation matters: outside the body gamma is the bigger risk because it penetrates to organs, while contamination makes alpha the bigger risk because it is highly ionising and gets absorbed directly by tissue. That is why gloves are worn even though they cannot stop irradiation: they prevent transfer of material.

    Suitable precautions must be taken to protect against any hazard that the radioactive source used in the process of irradiation may present.

    Anything used to irradiate an object is itself a radiation source, so the people nearby must be protected. Three controls do the work. Reduce time: return the source to its lead-lined box between measurements rather than leaving it out. Increase distance: handle sources with long tongs, hold them at arm's length and point them away from people, since the radiation spreads out and the dose falls with distance. Add shielding: lead or thick concrete for gamma, a few millimetres of aluminium for beta. Sealed sources and gloves add protection against contamination as well, which matters because gloves prevent transfer of radioactive material even though they do not stop the hands being irradiated. Workers wear film badges to monitor the dose they accumulate.

    Students should understand that it is important for the findings of studies into the effects of radiation on humans to be published and shared with other scientists so that the findings can be checked by peer review.

    Findings about how radiation affects people carry real consequences, so they are published rather than kept in-house. Publication lets other scientists peer review the work: they read the method and the data, look for flaws in the design and check whether the conclusions genuinely follow from the results. It also lets other groups repeat the study independently, which tests whether the findings are reproducible rather than a product of one team's equipment, sample or bias. A single result that nobody can reproduce is not treated as established. Publication also promotes further enquiry, prompting new experiments and new explanations. This is how a claim that challenges accepted theory gets tested rather than simply accepted or dismissed.

    Your focus

    1. Define radioactive contamination in terms of the transfer of radioactive atoms rather than of radiation.
    2. Explain why polythene gloves prevent contamination but do not prevent irradiation.
    3. Classify described scenarios as contamination or irradiation and justify each choice.
    Show all 24 objectives
    1. Explain why alpha radiation presents a low external risk but a high internal risk once contamination has occurred.
    2. Link the continued decay of contaminating atoms to a dose received over an extended period.
    3. Describe the biological consequence of a raised dose in terms of damage to cells, DNA and the risk of cancer.
    4. Rank alpha, beta and gamma by ionising power and by penetrating power, giving a named absorber for each.
    5. Predict which radiation type poses the greater hazard for a source inside the body and for one outside it.
    6. Justify a hazard ranking using the range of the radiation in air and the material that stops it.
    7. Define irradiation as exposure to radiation from an external source, with no transfer of material.
    8. Describe two situations where objects are irradiated on purpose, and say what the radiation achieves.
    9. State how time, distance and shielding each reduce the exposure a person receives from a source.
    10. Explain, in terms of nuclei and electrons, why an irradiated object does not become a source of radiation.
    11. Justify the safety of gamma sterilised food using the fact that no radioactive material is transferred.
    12. Distinguish the after-effects of irradiating an object from those of contaminating it.
    13. Compare irradiation and contamination on what is transferred, how long the hazard lasts and which radiation type dominates.
    14. Explain why a precaution can reduce one of the two hazards while leaving the other unchanged.
    15. Decide, for a described incident, which of the two hazards is more serious and justify the decision.
    16. Suggest two precautions for handling a radioactive source and state which hazard each one reduces.
    17. Select suitable shielding for an alpha, a beta and a gamma source, giving the material and thickness in each case.
    18. Explain why reducing exposure time and increasing distance both reduce the dose a worker receives.
    19. Give two distinct reasons why scientists publish findings that they cannot yet explain.
    20. Explain what peer review checks, and what it does not guarantee, about a published study.
    21. Distinguish reproducing a study in another laboratory from repeating a measurement within one experiment.

    Radioactive contamination exam tips

    Marking Points
    • one mark for contamination being the unwanted presence of materials containing radioactive atoms on other materials
    • one mark for the radioactive material itself being transferred, on or inside a person or object
    • one mark for the contrast with irradiation, which is exposure to radiation from a source outside the object
    • one mark for a precaution such as gloves, which prevents transfer of material even though it does not stop irradiation
    • one mark for the hazard lasting as long as the contaminating atoms continue to decay
    • one mark for alpha radiation having a low penetrating ability, so externally it is stopped or absorbed by the skin and the risk is low
    • one mark for internal contamination putting the source where alpha radiation is absorbed by living tissue or organs
    • one mark for alpha radiation being highly ionising, so the internal dose causes greater harm to cells, tissues, organs or DNA
    • one mark for linking the increased radiation dose to a greater chance of mutations or of developing cancer
    • one mark for ranking ionising power as alpha highest, then beta, then gamma lowest
    • one mark for ranking penetration as gamma highest, then beta, then alpha, with a named absorber for each
    • one mark for gamma being the greater hazard outside the body because it passes through skin to reach organs
    • one mark for alpha being the greater hazard inside the body because it is highly ionising and is absorbed by tissue
    • one mark for irradiation being the exposure of an object to nuclear radiation from a source outside it
    • one mark for the radioactive source remaining separate, with no radioactive material transferred
    • one mark for the exposure ending as soon as the source is removed or shielded
    • one mark for a named use or control measure, such as sterilising instruments or storing the source in a lead-lined box
    • one mark for the irradiated object not becoming a source of radiation itself
    • one mark for the radiation ionising atoms by removing electrons while leaving the nuclei unchanged
    • one mark for the object emitting nothing once the source is removed or shielded
    • one mark for applying this to sterilised food or instruments being safe to handle or eat afterwards
    • one mark for irradiation being exposure to radiation while contamination is the unwanted presence of radioactive material on or inside the person or object
    • one mark for irradiation ending when the source is removed, whereas contamination continues while the atoms decay
    • one mark for contamination being the greater hazard inside the body because alpha radiation is absorbed by tissue
    • one mark for a gamma source being the greater external hazard because gamma passes through skin
    • one mark for gloves preventing contamination even though they do not prevent irradiation
    • one mark for a named precaution that increases distance, such as using long tongs or holding the source at arm's length
    • one mark for a precaution that reduces exposure time, such as returning the source to a lead-lined box between readings
    • one mark for named shielding matched to the radiation, lead or concrete for gamma
    • one mark for gloves or a sealed source preventing transfer of radioactive material as well as limiting irradiation
    • one mark for publication allowing peer review of the data and method by other scientists
    • one mark for allowing other scientists to repeat the work and assess the reproducibility of the data
    • one mark for promoting further enquiry or further experiments
    • one mark for encouraging other scientists to develop explanations or new theories for the findings
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Use the word 'material' or 'atoms' in the definition; an answer that only says 'radiation' will be read as irradiation and lose the mark.
    • 💡Examiners allow 'an object' in place of 'a person', so a general answer is safe here.
    • 💡If the question mentions gloves or clothing, the answer is almost certainly about preventing transfer of material.
    • 💡Answer in two halves: what happens outside the body, then what happens inside, because the mark scheme awards both.
    • 💡Use 'highly ionising' and 'absorbed by tissue' as a pair; one without the other rarely gets the full explanation mark.
    • 💡Mention the half-life if the question gives one, since a long half-life means the hazard persists.
    • 💡In a draw-one-line question, check you have exactly one line from each radiation type; extra lines mean the list principle is applied and marks are lost.
    • 💡Always say whether the source is inside or outside the body before you rank the hazard, because the answer reverses.
    • 💡Name the absorber, not just 'thick material', when describing penetration.
    • 💡Keep 'exposure to radiation' as your opening phrase; it is the wording the mark scheme uses.
    • 💡If both terms appear in a question, define each in one sentence rather than describing only the difference.
    • 💡Name time, distance and shielding as the three ways exposure is reduced, since questions often want one of each.
    • 💡Answer with the nucleus: saying the nuclei are unchanged is what earns the explanation mark rather than just repeating the statement.
    • 💡Pair this point with contamination in comparison questions, because the contrast is what is being tested.
    • 💡Use a worked example such as sterilised instruments to show the idea applied, not just stated.
    • 💡Set the answer out as paired statements, one sentence on irradiation followed by one on contamination, so each comparison is visible.
    • 💡Use a comparative connective such as 'whereas' in every pair; a list of facts about each is often not credited as a comparison.
    • 💡Bring in half-life if one is quoted, because it controls how long the contamination hazard lasts.
    • 💡Pick precautions from different categories, one for time, one for distance and one for shielding, so they cannot be read as the same point twice.
    • 💡Match the shielding to the radiation named in the question; lead for an alpha source is not credited as good practice.
    • 💡Say what the precaution achieves, not just what it is, because the reason often carries the second mark.
    • 💡Give two distinct reasons when two are asked for; 'checked by others' and 'repeated by others' count as one idea if not clearly separated.
    • 💡Use the term 'peer review' explicitly, since it is the phrase the mark scheme rewards.
    • 💡Keep the answer about the process of science, not about the dangers of radiation, even though radiation is the topic.
    Common Mistakes
    • defining contamination as being hit by radiation, which is irradiation
    • saying gloves stop the hands being irradiated
    • claiming an object becomes contaminated simply by being near a source
    • writing that 'radiation gets on you' rather than radioactive material
    • assuming contamination is only external, when swallowed or inhaled material is the more serious case
    • saying the radiation stays in the body, when it is the radioactive material that stays
    • assuming alpha is the least dangerous radiation in every situation
    • giving 'radiation is harmful' with no mention of ionisation or of damage to cells
    • claiming a contaminated object is safe once it has been moved away from the original source
    • confusing the decay of the contaminating atoms with the object itself becoming radioactive through irradiation
    • matching alpha to high penetrating power because it is the most dangerous kind they have heard of
    • stating that gamma is the most dangerous radiation in every situation
    • saying beta is stopped by paper, or that gamma is stopped by aluminium
    • treating ionising power and penetrating power as the same ranking
    • naming an absorber without saying which radiation it stops in a line-matching question
    • writing that irradiation makes the object radioactive
    • using irradiation and contamination as though they mean the same thing
    • saying gloves prevent irradiation
    • assuming irradiated food carries radioactive material and is unsafe to eat
    • describing irradiation as harmless because nothing is transferred, ignoring the damage the radiation does while it passes through
    • claiming irradiated food is radioactive and therefore dangerous to eat
    • saying some radiation is left behind, or soaks into, the irradiated object
    • concluding that irradiation is harmless to living tissue because nothing is transferred
    • confusing the ionisation of electrons with a change to the nucleus
    • using this statement to argue that a contaminated object is also not radioactive
    • using the two words interchangeably within the same answer
    • asserting that contamination is always worse without naming a radiation type or a timescale
    • claiming a lab coat or gloves shield a person from gamma radiation
    • describing only the difference in definition and never comparing the hazards, which is what the question asks
    • saying an irradiated person continues to be exposed after the source is put away
    • giving a vague precaution such as 'be careful' or 'follow the safety rules', which earns nothing
    • saying a lab coat or safety goggles stop gamma radiation
    • claiming gloves reduce the irradiation of the hands
    • naming paper as shielding for a gamma source
    • offering only one precaution when the question asks for two
    • writing 'so everyone knows about it' without naming any checking process
    • saying peer review proves the results are correct rather than checking them
    • confusing peer review with repeating a reading yourself to calculate a mean
    • claiming that once published a finding cannot be challenged
    • arguing the scientists should withhold unexplained results until they can explain them