Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    Component 2: Ethics (knowledge, understanding and application of) — Eduqas A-Level Psychology

    Test yourself on Component 2: Ethics (knowledge, understanding and application of) with EDUQAS A-Level practice questions.

    Start free

    7 days Premium · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Your focus

    1. confidentiality
    2. risk of stress, anxiety, humiliation or pain
    3. risk to the participants’ values, beliefs, relationships, status or privacy
    Show all 7 objectives
    1. valid consent
    2. working with vulnerable individuals (including children)
    3. working with animals
    4. managing the risk posed by ethical issues (including the use of ethics committees and ethical guidelines)

    Component 2: Ethics (knowledge, understanding and application of) exam tips

    Quick Revision Summary (Key Takeaway)

    Component 2: Ethics for Eduqas A-Level Psychology examines the ethical guidelines that govern psychological research, including informed consent, deception, protection from harm, confidentiality, privacy, and the ethical issues surrounding human and animal participants. Students must apply these principles to real and hypothetical studies, evaluating costs and benefits using frameworks such as the BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct.

    Topic Overview

    Component 2: Ethics covers the moral principles that guide psychological research involving human and animal participants. It explores core ethical guidelines such as informed consent, deception, protection from harm, confidentiality, privacy, and the right to withdraw, as well as the ethical treatment of animals. Students learn to apply these guidelines to real and hypothetical studies, evaluating the balance between scientific benefits and participant welfare.

    This topic is essential for understanding how psychological research is conducted responsibly and how ethical considerations shape research design. It connects to other areas of psychology, including research methods, social influence, and clinical psychology, and is assessed through scenario-based questions that require application and evaluation. Mastery of ethics is crucial for achieving high marks in exams and for conducting ethical research in the future.

    Key Concepts
    • →Informed consent: participants must be given comprehensive information about the study's purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits before agreeing to take part, ensuring they can make an informed decision.
    • →Deception: misleading participants about the true aim or procedures; it is only acceptable if it is necessary for the study and is fully debriefed afterwards, with no risk of harm.
    • →Protection from harm: researchers must ensure participants are not exposed to physical or psychological harm greater than they would experience in everyday life; if harm is unavoidable, it must be justified and minimised.
    • →Confidentiality and privacy: participants' data must be kept confidential and their privacy respected; personal information should not be shared without consent, and anonymity should be maintained where possible.
    • →Ethical cost-benefit analysis: researchers must weigh the potential scientific benefits of a study against the ethical costs to participants, using frameworks such as the BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct to justify decisions.
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Always link ethical issues to the specific study scenario. Generic answers that list guidelines without application will not gain full marks. Use the 'issue - consequence - solution' structure.
    • 💡When evaluating ethical costs and benefits, avoid absolute statements. Instead, use a balanced approach, considering both the scientific benefits and the ethical costs, and suggest how issues could be resolved.
    • 💡Reference the BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct or relevant legislation (e.g., Data Protection Act) to demonstrate deeper understanding and secure top-band marks.
    Common Mistakes
    • Students often think that deception is always unethical and should never be used. In fact, deception can be justified if it is necessary for the study, does not cause harm, and participants are fully debriefed afterwards.
    • Many students confuse ethical guidelines with ethical issues. Guidelines are the principles (e.g., informed consent), while issues are the problems that arise when guidelines are not met (e.g., lack of informed consent).
    • Students sometimes believe that animals cannot be used in psychological research under any circumstances. However, animal research is permitted if it follows strict guidelines (e.g., the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986) and has clear scientific benefits.
    Revision Plan
    1. 1Step 1: Learn the core ethical guidelines (informed consent, deception, protection from harm, confidentiality, privacy, right to withdraw) and the BPS principles. Create flashcards with definitions and examples.
    2. 2Step 2: Apply each guideline to at least two classic studies (e.g., Milgram, Zimbardo) and identify the ethical issues and how they were addressed. Practice writing 'issue - consequence - solution' paragraphs.
    3. 3Step 3: Practice cost-benefit analysis by evaluating the ethical costs and scientific benefits of a controversial study. Write a balanced evaluation paragraph.
    4. 4Step 4: Complete past exam questions on ethics, focusing on scenario-based questions. Mark your answers using the mark scheme and identify areas for improvement.
    5. 5Step 5: Review animal research ethics and the relevant legislation. Create a comparison table of human and animal ethical guidelines.
    Exam Question Types
    • 📋Scenario-based short answer questions (e.g., 'Identify two ethical issues in this study and suggest how each could be addressed'). Advice: Read the scenario carefully, name the issue, explain why it is an issue in context, and suggest a practical solution.
    • 📋Extended writing questions (e.g., 'Discuss ethical issues in psychological research. Refer to examples in your answer.'). Advice: Structure your answer with an introduction, several paragraphs on different issues with examples, and a conclusion that weighs up costs and benefits.
    • 📋Questions on animal research (e.g., 'Outline the ethical guidelines for using animals in psychological research.'). Advice: Know the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the three Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement).
    • 📋Evaluation questions (e.g., 'Evaluate the ethical costs and benefits of conducting research on obedience.'). Advice: Use a cost-benefit framework, consider both sides, and reach a justified conclusion.
    Command Word Expectations (EDUQAS)
    Identify

    In Eduqas A-Level Psychology, 'identify' requires you to name or select the correct ethical issue or guideline from the scenario. No explanation is needed, but you must be precise. For example, 'lack of informed consent' rather than just 'consent'.

    Explain

    'Explain' requires you to give reasons or causes for something, showing your understanding. For example, explain why lack of informed consent is an ethical issue: because participants cannot make a fully informed decision about taking part, which undermines their autonomy.

    Discuss

    'Discuss' requires a balanced consideration of different perspectives, including strengths and weaknesses, and a conclusion. For ethics, you should present ethical issues, ways of dealing with them, and evaluate the costs and benefits, using examples and referencing the BPS code.

    Evaluate

    'Evaluate' requires you to make a judgement about the value or importance of something, weighing up evidence and arguments. For ethics, you should assess the extent to which a study is ethical, considering both costs and benefits, and reach a justified conclusion.

    How Students Lose Marks (Examiner Pitfalls)
    Pitfall: Students often confuse ethical guidelines with ethical issues, or list guidelines without applying them to the specific study scenario. They also fail to distinguish between ethical issues and ways of dealing with them, leading to vague answers.
    ❌ Weak Answer (Loses Marks):One ethical issue is informed consent. Participants should be told what the study is about. Another issue is deception. Researchers should not lie to participants.
    Example improved answer:A key ethical issue in this study is the lack of informed consent: participants were not told the true aim of the research, meaning they could not make an informed decision about whether to take part. This is problematic because it undermines their autonomy and may cause psychological harm if they later discover the deception. To deal with this, researchers could obtain presumptive consent from a similar group or debrief participants fully afterwards, ensuring they understand the true purpose and have the right to withdraw their data.
    Examiner Tip: Always name the ethical issue, explain why it is an issue in the specific context, and then suggest a concrete way to address it. Use the 'issue - consequence - solution' structure to secure all marks.
    Pitfall: When evaluating ethical costs and benefits, students often give generic statements like 'the study was unethical' without weighing up the scientific benefits or considering alternative viewpoints. They also ignore the role of the ethics committee or the difference between ethical guidelines and legal requirements.
    ❌ Weak Answer (Loses Marks):This study was unethical because it deceived participants. Deception is always wrong, so the study should not have been done.
    Example improved answer:While the study involved deception, which is an ethical issue, it could be justified by the significant scientific benefits: it provided valuable insight into obedience that has since been used to improve ethical safeguards in research. Using a cost-benefit analysis, the psychological harm to participants (stress, embarrassment) must be weighed against the contribution to knowledge. The researchers could have reduced the cost by fully debriefing participants and offering counselling, as Milgram did. Therefore, the study was not necessarily unethical overall, but it required careful justification and ethical safeguards.
    Examiner Tip: Avoid absolute statements like 'always wrong'. Instead, use the cost-benefit approach recommended by the BPS and consider how ethical issues can be resolved. Reference the BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct to show depth.
    Step-by-Step Worked Solutions

    Question: A psychologist wants to investigate the effect of sleep deprivation on memory. Participants are asked to stay awake for 24 hours and then complete a memory test. They are not told the true aim of the study, and they are not allowed to withdraw once the study begins. Identify two ethical issues in this study and suggest how each could be addressed. (6 marks)

    1. 1.Step 1: Identify the ethical issues from the scenario: lack of informed consent (participants not told true aim) and lack of right to withdraw (not allowed to withdraw).
    2. 2.Step 2: Explain why each is an issue: informed consent is needed so participants can make an informed decision; right to withdraw protects participants from harm and respects autonomy.
    3. 3.Step 3: Suggest a way to address each: obtain informed consent by giving full information before the study, or use presumptive consent; allow participants to withdraw at any time and remind them of this right throughout.
    Final Answer: Two ethical issues are lack of informed consent and lack of right to withdraw. Informed consent could be addressed by providing full details of the study beforehand and obtaining written consent, or by using presumptive consent from a similar group. Right to withdraw could be addressed by clearly informing participants at the start that they can leave at any time without penalty and reminding them of this during the study.

    Question: Explain how a researcher could deal with the ethical issue of deception in a study investigating conformity. (4 marks)

    1. 1.Step 1: Define deception: misleading participants about the true aim or procedures of the study.
    2. 2.Step 2: Identify a way to deal with deception: debriefing participants after the study, where the true aim is revealed and any misconceptions are corrected.
    3. 3.Step 3: Explain how debriefing addresses the issue: it restores participants' understanding, reduces potential harm, and allows them to withdraw their data if they wish.
    4. 4.Step 4: Mention an alternative: obtain prior general consent or presumptive consent, where participants agree to take part in research that may involve deception.
    Final Answer: Deception can be dealt with by debriefing participants immediately after the study. The researcher should explain the true aim, why deception was necessary, and ensure participants leave in a positive state. Additionally, presumptive consent could be obtained from a similar group before the study, or participants could be given the right to withdraw their data after debriefing.
    Active Recall Memory Test
    What are the four ethical principles outlined in the BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct?
    Key Fact: Respect, competence, responsibility, and integrity.
    What is the difference between confidentiality and privacy in psychological research?
    Key Fact: Confidentiality refers to keeping participants' data secure and not sharing it without consent, while privacy refers to the participant's right to control information about themselves and not be observed or questioned about private matters without consent.
    What are the three Rs in animal research ethics?
    Key Fact: Replacement (using non-animal alternatives where possible), reduction (using the minimum number of animals necessary), and refinement (minimising suffering and improving welfare).
    When is deception considered acceptable in psychological research?
    Key Fact: Deception is acceptable when it is necessary for the study, does not cause harm, and participants are fully debriefed afterwards. It must be justified by the scientific benefits and approved by an ethics committee.
    Frequently Asked Questions
    What is the difference between ethical guidelines and ethical issues in psychology?
    Ethical guidelines are the principles set out by professional bodies such as the BPS to ensure research is conducted morally, for example, obtaining informed consent. Ethical issues are the problems that arise when these guidelines are not met or are difficult to apply, such as when deception is used and informed consent is not possible. In exams, you need to identify both the guideline and the issue it creates in a specific study.
    How do I evaluate ethical costs and benefits in an exam answer?
    To evaluate costs and benefits, you should first identify the ethical costs (e.g., psychological harm, lack of informed consent) and the scientific benefits (e.g., increased understanding of behaviour, potential applications). Then, weigh them up: are the benefits significant enough to justify the costs? Consider how the costs could be reduced (e.g., through debriefing) and whether the study could have been conducted differently. Conclude with a justified judgement about whether the study was ethical overall.
    What are the ethical guidelines for using animals in psychological research?
    In the UK, animal research is governed by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, which requires that research using animals must be justified by its potential benefits, use the minimum number of animals, and minimise suffering. The three Rs guide ethical animal research: replacement (using alternatives), reduction (using fewer animals), and refinement (improving procedures to reduce suffering). Researchers must also ensure animals are housed and cared for appropriately and that any pain or distress is minimised.
    Can deception ever be justified in psychological research?
    Yes, deception can be justified if it is essential for the study's validity, if there are no alternative methods, and if the potential scientific benefits outweigh the ethical costs. However, it must not cause harm, and participants must be fully debriefed afterwards, where the true aim is revealed and any misconceptions are corrected. Deception should be approved by an ethics committee and used as a last resort.
    What is presumptive consent and when is it used?
    Presumptive consent is a method of dealing with the ethical issue of informed consent when it is not possible to obtain full consent from participants. It involves asking a group of people similar to the target participants whether they would agree to take part in the study, and if they say yes, it is presumed that the actual participants would also consent. It is often used in studies involving deception or when participants cannot be fully informed in advance.
    How do I structure an answer to a 6-mark ethics question?
    For a 6-mark question, you should aim to identify two ethical issues and explain each one in detail, using the 'issue - consequence - solution' structure. For example, name the issue (e.g., lack of informed consent), explain why it is an issue in the context of the study (e.g., participants could not make an informed decision), and suggest a way to address it (e.g., obtain presumptive consent or debrief). Use specific terminology and refer to the scenario to secure full marks.