Component 2: Ethics (knowledge, understanding and application of) — Eduqas A-Level Psychology
Test yourself on Component 2: Ethics (knowledge, understanding and application of) with EDUQAS A-Level practice questions.
7 days Premium · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Your focus
- confidentiality
- risk of stress, anxiety, humiliation or pain
- risk to the participants’ values, beliefs, relationships, status or privacy
Show all 7 objectives
- valid consent
- working with vulnerable individuals (including children)
- working with animals
- managing the risk posed by ethical issues (including the use of ethics committees and ethical guidelines)
Component 2: Ethics (knowledge, understanding and application of) exam tips
Quick Revision Summary (Key Takeaway)
Component 2: Ethics for Eduqas A-Level Psychology examines the ethical guidelines that govern psychological research, including informed consent, deception, protection from harm, confidentiality, privacy, and the ethical issues surrounding human and animal participants. Students must apply these principles to real and hypothetical studies, evaluating costs and benefits using frameworks such as the BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct.
Topic Overview
Component 2: Ethics covers the moral principles that guide psychological research involving human and animal participants. It explores core ethical guidelines such as informed consent, deception, protection from harm, confidentiality, privacy, and the right to withdraw, as well as the ethical treatment of animals. Students learn to apply these guidelines to real and hypothetical studies, evaluating the balance between scientific benefits and participant welfare.
This topic is essential for understanding how psychological research is conducted responsibly and how ethical considerations shape research design. It connects to other areas of psychology, including research methods, social influence, and clinical psychology, and is assessed through scenario-based questions that require application and evaluation. Mastery of ethics is crucial for achieving high marks in exams and for conducting ethical research in the future.
Key Concepts
- →Informed consent: participants must be given comprehensive information about the study's purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits before agreeing to take part, ensuring they can make an informed decision.
- →Deception: misleading participants about the true aim or procedures; it is only acceptable if it is necessary for the study and is fully debriefed afterwards, with no risk of harm.
- →Protection from harm: researchers must ensure participants are not exposed to physical or psychological harm greater than they would experience in everyday life; if harm is unavoidable, it must be justified and minimised.
- →Confidentiality and privacy: participants' data must be kept confidential and their privacy respected; personal information should not be shared without consent, and anonymity should be maintained where possible.
- →Ethical cost-benefit analysis: researchers must weigh the potential scientific benefits of a study against the ethical costs to participants, using frameworks such as the BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct to justify decisions.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Always link ethical issues to the specific study scenario. Generic answers that list guidelines without application will not gain full marks. Use the 'issue - consequence - solution' structure.
- 💡When evaluating ethical costs and benefits, avoid absolute statements. Instead, use a balanced approach, considering both the scientific benefits and the ethical costs, and suggest how issues could be resolved.
- 💡Reference the BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct or relevant legislation (e.g., Data Protection Act) to demonstrate deeper understanding and secure top-band marks.
Common Mistakes
- Students often think that deception is always unethical and should never be used. In fact, deception can be justified if it is necessary for the study, does not cause harm, and participants are fully debriefed afterwards.
- Many students confuse ethical guidelines with ethical issues. Guidelines are the principles (e.g., informed consent), while issues are the problems that arise when guidelines are not met (e.g., lack of informed consent).
- Students sometimes believe that animals cannot be used in psychological research under any circumstances. However, animal research is permitted if it follows strict guidelines (e.g., the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986) and has clear scientific benefits.
Revision Plan
- 1Step 1: Learn the core ethical guidelines (informed consent, deception, protection from harm, confidentiality, privacy, right to withdraw) and the BPS principles. Create flashcards with definitions and examples.
- 2Step 2: Apply each guideline to at least two classic studies (e.g., Milgram, Zimbardo) and identify the ethical issues and how they were addressed. Practice writing 'issue - consequence - solution' paragraphs.
- 3Step 3: Practice cost-benefit analysis by evaluating the ethical costs and scientific benefits of a controversial study. Write a balanced evaluation paragraph.
- 4Step 4: Complete past exam questions on ethics, focusing on scenario-based questions. Mark your answers using the mark scheme and identify areas for improvement.
- 5Step 5: Review animal research ethics and the relevant legislation. Create a comparison table of human and animal ethical guidelines.
Exam Question Types
- 📋Scenario-based short answer questions (e.g., 'Identify two ethical issues in this study and suggest how each could be addressed'). Advice: Read the scenario carefully, name the issue, explain why it is an issue in context, and suggest a practical solution.
- 📋Extended writing questions (e.g., 'Discuss ethical issues in psychological research. Refer to examples in your answer.'). Advice: Structure your answer with an introduction, several paragraphs on different issues with examples, and a conclusion that weighs up costs and benefits.
- 📋Questions on animal research (e.g., 'Outline the ethical guidelines for using animals in psychological research.'). Advice: Know the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the three Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement).
- 📋Evaluation questions (e.g., 'Evaluate the ethical costs and benefits of conducting research on obedience.'). Advice: Use a cost-benefit framework, consider both sides, and reach a justified conclusion.
Command Word Expectations (EDUQAS)
In Eduqas A-Level Psychology, 'identify' requires you to name or select the correct ethical issue or guideline from the scenario. No explanation is needed, but you must be precise. For example, 'lack of informed consent' rather than just 'consent'.
'Explain' requires you to give reasons or causes for something, showing your understanding. For example, explain why lack of informed consent is an ethical issue: because participants cannot make a fully informed decision about taking part, which undermines their autonomy.
'Discuss' requires a balanced consideration of different perspectives, including strengths and weaknesses, and a conclusion. For ethics, you should present ethical issues, ways of dealing with them, and evaluate the costs and benefits, using examples and referencing the BPS code.
'Evaluate' requires you to make a judgement about the value or importance of something, weighing up evidence and arguments. For ethics, you should assess the extent to which a study is ethical, considering both costs and benefits, and reach a justified conclusion.
How Students Lose Marks (Examiner Pitfalls)
Step-by-Step Worked Solutions
Question: A psychologist wants to investigate the effect of sleep deprivation on memory. Participants are asked to stay awake for 24 hours and then complete a memory test. They are not told the true aim of the study, and they are not allowed to withdraw once the study begins. Identify two ethical issues in this study and suggest how each could be addressed. (6 marks)
- 1.Step 1: Identify the ethical issues from the scenario: lack of informed consent (participants not told true aim) and lack of right to withdraw (not allowed to withdraw).
- 2.Step 2: Explain why each is an issue: informed consent is needed so participants can make an informed decision; right to withdraw protects participants from harm and respects autonomy.
- 3.Step 3: Suggest a way to address each: obtain informed consent by giving full information before the study, or use presumptive consent; allow participants to withdraw at any time and remind them of this right throughout.
Question: Explain how a researcher could deal with the ethical issue of deception in a study investigating conformity. (4 marks)
- 1.Step 1: Define deception: misleading participants about the true aim or procedures of the study.
- 2.Step 2: Identify a way to deal with deception: debriefing participants after the study, where the true aim is revealed and any misconceptions are corrected.
- 3.Step 3: Explain how debriefing addresses the issue: it restores participants' understanding, reduces potential harm, and allows them to withdraw their data if they wish.
- 4.Step 4: Mention an alternative: obtain prior general consent or presumptive consent, where participants agree to take part in research that may involve deception.