Component 3: Addictive behaviours — Eduqas A-Level Psychology
Test yourself on Component 3: Addictive behaviours with EDUQAS A-Level practice questions.
7 days Premium · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Your focus
- Biological explanations (at least two) (to include: For example addiction genes, disease of the brain, dopamine)
- Individual differences explanations (at least two) (to include: For example cognitive biases, field dependence, Lang’s addictive personality traits)
- Social Psychological Explanations (at least two) (to include: For example co-morbidity with mental illness, peer pressure, role of the media)
Show all 4 objectives
- Methods of modifying this behaviour (at least two) (to include: Including agonist and antagonist substitution, aversion therapy)
Component 3: Addictive behaviours exam tips
Quick Revision Summary (Key Takeaway)
Addictive behaviours in Eduqas A-Level Psychology examines the biological, psychological and social explanations for why individuals become dependent on substances such as nicotine, alcohol and gambling, alongside the methods used to prevent and treat these dependencies. It draws on key models including the biological approach (dopamine reward pathways, genetics) and the cognitive-behavioural approach (classical and operant conditioning, faulty cognitions) to explain initiation, maintenance and relapse.
Topic Overview
Component 3: Addictive behaviours is a core topic in the Eduqas A-Level Psychology specification. It explores the biological, psychological and social explanations for why individuals develop dependencies on substances such as nicotine, alcohol and gambling, and evaluates the methods used to prevent and treat these addictions. You will study key models including the biological approach (genetic vulnerability, dopamine reward pathways) and the cognitive-behavioural approach (classical and operant conditioning, faulty cognitions).
This topic matters because addiction has significant personal, social and economic consequences, and understanding its causes informs effective public health interventions. It also allows you to apply your knowledge of approaches (biological, behaviourist, cognitive) to a real-world context, which is a key skill in A-Level Psychology. The topic often appears in exam questions that require you to describe and evaluate explanations and treatments, so a strong grasp of research evidence and methodological critique is essential.
Key Concepts
- →Biological explanations of addiction: genetic vulnerability (e.g. CHRNA5, CYP2A6 genes), dopamine reward pathway (VTA to nucleus accumbens), and the role of tolerance and withdrawal in maintaining dependence.
- →Psychological explanations: classical conditioning (cue reactivity), operant conditioning (positive and negative reinforcement), and cognitive biases in gambling (gambler's fallacy, illusion of control, near-miss effect).
- →Social explanations: peer influence, family environment, socio-economic status, and cultural norms as risk factors for initiation and maintenance of addictive behaviours.
- →Treatments: biological (nicotine replacement therapy, naltrexone, methadone), psychological (CBT, aversion therapy, covert sensitisation), and social (Gamblers Anonymous, support groups).
- →Key research studies: Griffiths (2005) on gambling cognitions, Ladouceur et al. (2001) on CBT for gambling, and Volkow et al. (2007) on dopamine and addiction.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Always use specific terminology from the specification, such as 'mesolimbic dopamine pathway', 'nucleus accumbens', 'gambler's fallacy', 'illusion of control', 'positive reinforcement', 'negative reinforcement', 'tolerance' and 'withdrawal'. Vague language loses marks.
- 💡When evaluating, do not just list strengths and weaknesses. Link each point back to the question - e.g. explain why a methodological weakness (such as self-report bias) reduces the validity of the explanation or treatment being discussed.
- 💡For 10-mark questions, ensure you cover both description (AO1) and evaluation (AO3). A common mistake is to spend too long describing and not enough time evaluating, which limits you to a maximum of 6 marks.
Common Mistakes
- Students often think addiction is simply a lack of willpower. In fact, addiction involves biological changes in the brain (e.g. dopamine receptor downregulation) and psychological conditioning that make quitting extremely difficult, which is why treatments target these underlying mechanisms.
- Students frequently confuse positive and negative reinforcement. Positive reinforcement is when a behaviour is strengthened by adding a pleasurable consequence (e.g. the 'high' from a drug). Negative reinforcement is when a behaviour is strengthened by removing an unpleasant consequence (e.g. taking a drug to relieve withdrawal symptoms). Both maintain addiction but through different mechanisms.
- Students may assume that genetic explanations mean addiction is inevitable. However, genes only create a predisposition (diathesis), and environmental factors (stress, availability, peer pressure) are necessary to trigger the actual behaviour. This is the diathesis-stress model.
Revision Plan
- 1Week 1, Days 1-2: Create a detailed mind map of biological, psychological and social explanations for addiction. Include key terms, brain structures, genes and conditioning processes. Use colour coding for each approach.
- 2Week 1, Days 3-4: Learn the key research studies (e.g. Griffiths, 2005; Ladouceur et al., 2001; Volkow et al., 2007). For each study, note the aim, method, findings and one methodological criticism.
- 3Week 1, Days 5-7: Practice writing 6-mark and 10-mark answers for explanations. Use the mark scheme to self-assess, focusing on using specific terminology and linking evaluation points back to the question.
- 4Week 2, Days 1-3: Study treatments for addiction (biological, psychological, social). Create a comparison table showing the effectiveness, appropriateness and ethical issues of each treatment.
- 5Week 2, Days 4-7: Complete timed exam questions under exam conditions. Review mark schemes carefully and create flashcards for any facts or terms you repeatedly forget. Use active recall and spaced repetition.
Exam Question Types
- 📋Describe and evaluate a biological explanation of addiction (e.g. genetic vulnerability or dopamine hypothesis). 10 marks. Advice: Ensure you describe the explanation in detail (AO1) and then evaluate with at least two strengths and two weaknesses (AO3), using research evidence.
- 📋Outline and evaluate one psychological treatment for gambling addiction (e.g. CBT). 10 marks. Advice: Describe the treatment accurately, then evaluate using evidence of effectiveness, methodological issues, and comparison with alternative treatments.
- 📋Explain how social factors may contribute to the initiation of nicotine addiction. 6 marks. Advice: Focus on specific social factors such as peer influence, family smoking, socio-economic status, and cultural norms. Link each factor to initiation, not just maintenance.
- 📋Using your knowledge of research methods, explain one limitation of a study into addictive behaviours. 4 marks. Advice: Identify a specific methodological issue (e.g. self-report bias, small sample, lack of generalisability) and explain how it affects the validity or reliability of the findings.
Command Word Expectations (EDUQAS)
Provide a detailed account of the key features, processes or research. In Eduqas A-Level Psychology, 'describe' questions (AO1) require accurate, specific detail with correct terminology. No evaluation is needed unless the question also says 'evaluate'.
Make a judgement about the value, strengths and weaknesses of a theory, study or treatment. You must use evidence (research studies) and methodological critique. In Eduqas, evaluation (AO3) requires you to weigh up both sides and reach a justified conclusion.
Give reasons or mechanisms for why something occurs. This requires you to make the causal link explicit - e.g. 'This leads to... because...'. In Eduqas, 'explain' questions often require application of knowledge to a scenario or process.
How Students Lose Marks (Examiner Pitfalls)
Step-by-Step Worked Solutions
Question: Using the biological approach, explain how genetic factors may contribute to the development of nicotine addiction. (6 marks)
- 1.Step 1: Identify the key genetic concept - heritability and specific genes associated with nicotine metabolism and dopamine receptors.
- 2.Step 2: Explain the role of the CHRNA5 gene cluster, which codes for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, and how variations increase sensitivity to nicotine's effects.
- 3.Step 3: Explain how the CYP2A6 gene affects the rate of nicotine metabolism - slow metabolisers experience stronger effects and may be more likely to become dependent.
- 4.Step 4: Link genetic vulnerability to the diathesis-stress model - genes create a predisposition, but environmental factors (e.g. peer pressure, availability) trigger the actual addiction.
- 5.Step 5: Conclude with a clear statement of how genetics contribute to initiation and maintenance of nicotine addiction.
Question: Describe and evaluate the cognitive-behavioural approach to treating gambling addiction. (10 marks)
- 1.Step 1: Describe the cognitive-behavioural approach - it targets both maladaptive cognitions (e.g. gambler's fallacy) and the reinforcing behaviours that maintain gambling.
- 2.Step 2: Describe a specific CBT intervention - e.g. cognitive restructuring to challenge the illusion of control, and behavioural techniques such as self-monitoring and stimulus control.
- 3.Step 3: Evaluate effectiveness - cite evidence such as Ladouceur et al. (2001) who found CBT significantly reduced gambling frequency and expenditure compared to a control group.
- 4.Step 4: Evaluate methodological issues - many studies use self-report measures, which may be subject to social desirability bias; also, relapse rates are high, suggesting CBT may not address underlying biological or environmental factors.
- 5.Step 5: Compare with alternative treatments - e.g. pharmacological treatments (naltrexone) or Gamblers Anonymous, and conclude that CBT is effective but may be best used in combination with other approaches.