This subtopic examines the Crown Prosecution Service's function as the principal public prosecutor in England and Wales, focusing on its operational struct
Topic Synopsis
This subtopic examines the Crown Prosecution Service's function as the principal public prosecutor in England and Wales, focusing on its operational structure, decision-making frameworks, and collaborative relationships with legal professionals. It emphasises the practical application of the Code for Crown Prosecutors in charging decisions and highlights the critical responsibilities of CPS paralegals in case preparation, witness support, and victim communication throughout criminal proceedings.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- The Full Code Test and the Threshold Test under the Code for Crown Prosecutors, including the evidential and public interest stages.
- The roles and responsibilities of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), including the decision to charge, review, and discontinue cases.
- Bail procedures: the right to bail, exceptions under the Bail Act 1976, and the factors courts consider when granting or refusing bail.
- Disclosure obligations under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, including the duties of the prosecution and defence.
- The trial process: from plea before venue and allocation to the roles of magistrates, juries, and judges in summary and indictable offences.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- Always anchor your answers in the Code for Crown Prosecutors; cite specific paragraphs (e.g., para 4.6 for the evidential stage) to demonstrate authoritative knowledge.
- When explaining CPS-counsel relationships, use precise language: 'the CPS instructs counsel' and reference the CPS Advocate Panel Scheme to show understanding of quality assurance.
- Structure answers around the practical workflow of a case—from charging decision to court hearing—highlighting where paralegals and victim communication duties intervene.
- Prepare a concise list of key statutes and guidelines (e.g., Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, Victims' Code) to efficiently reference in responses, demonstrating applied knowledge.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Confusing the CPS role with that of the police, assuming the CPS conducts investigations or makes arrest decisions, rather than providing charging advice and prosecuting.
- Misunderstanding the discretionary nature of prosecution, often stating that all reported offences must be charged if evidence exists, ignoring the public interest stage.
- Referring to external counsel as 'employed' by the CPS, rather than recognising the independent, instructed status of barristers, and failing to use the term 'counsel' correctly.
- Overlooking the distinct role of paralegals by conflating it with that of a police case builder or assuming paralegals have rights of audience in court.
- Neglecting victim and witness communication obligations, such as failing to mention the need for regular updates, making referrals to Victim Support, or addressing special measures like screens or video links.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for accurately describing the Full Code Test, explicitly referencing both the evidential and public interest stages as set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors.
- Award credit for demonstrating knowledge of the CPS hierarchical structure, from the Director of Public Prosecutions to Legal Trainee/Paralegal, and explaining the delegation of authority.
- Award credit for explaining the distinction between CPS in-house prosecutors and external counsel (barristers), including the process of instructing counsel and the allocation of cases under the CPS Advocate Panel Scheme.
- Award credit for identifying specific paralegal duties, such as reviewing case files, obtaining additional evidence, liaising with police, and ensuring compliance with the Victims' Code.
- Award credit for assessing the practical steps taken to communicate with victims and witnesses, including the provision of information, referrals to support services, and the handling of special measures applications.