Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    Christianity: Religion and secularisation — AQA A-Level Religious Studies

    Test yourself on Christianity: Religion and secularisation with AQA A-Level practice questions.

    Start free

    7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge

    Christianity: Religion and secularisation explained

    This topic examines the challenge of secularisation to Christianity within the British context, focusing on the shift in religion's role in society, the rise of militant atheism, and Christian responses to these challenges, including new forms of expression and social relevance.

    What to demonstrate

    1. Understanding of secularisation as the replacement of religion as the source of truth and moral values
    2. Recognition of the relegation of religion to the personal sphere
    3. Analysis of the rise of militant atheism and the view that religion is irrational
    Show all 7 objectives
    1. Evaluation of Christian responses to materialistic secular values, specifically regarding wealth and possessions
    2. Knowledge of Alister McGrath’s defence of Christianity in 'The Dawkins Delusion'
    3. Understanding of the emergence of new forms of expression such as Fresh Expressions and the House Church movement
    4. Analysis of the emphasis on the social relevance of Christianity, including liberationist approaches supporting the poor and defending the oppressed

    Christianity: Religion and secularisation exam tips

    Topic Overview

    This topic explores the relationship between Christianity and secularisation, a key debate in the sociology of religion. Secularisation refers to the declining influence of religion in public and private life, and this unit examines how Christianity in the UK has been affected by processes such as rationalisation, individualism, and the rise of alternative worldviews. Students will analyse statistical trends in church attendance, belief, and affiliation, as well as theoretical perspectives from sociologists like Peter Berger, Steve Bruce, and Grace Davie.

    Understanding secularisation is crucial for evaluating the changing role of Christianity in modern Britain. The topic connects to broader debates about the nature of belief, the privatisation of religion, and the emergence of new spiritualities. It also requires critical engagement with counterarguments, such as the 'religious economy' model and the idea of 'believing without belonging'. Mastery of this topic enables students to assess the extent to which the UK can be described as a secular society and to evaluate the future of Christianity in a pluralistic context.

    Within the AQA A-Level Religious Studies specification, this topic sits under the 'Religion and Society' component. It builds on earlier study of Christian beliefs and practices, and it links to themes like religion and social change, and the relationship between religion and science. Students are expected to use sociological evidence and philosophical arguments to construct balanced, well-supported essays.

    Key Concepts
    • →Secularisation thesis: The theory that religion loses social significance as societies modernise, associated with thinkers like Weber, Berger, and Bruce.
    • →Differentiation: The process by which religious institutions lose control over other social spheres (e.g., politics, education, law), a key aspect of secularisation.
    • →Privatisation: The idea that religion becomes a matter of personal choice rather than public obligation, leading to a decline in institutional authority.
    • →Believing without belonging: Grace Davie's concept that many people retain religious beliefs but do not participate in organised religion, challenging simple secularisation narratives.
    • →Religious economy model: Stark and Bainbridge's argument that religion persists because it offers compensators; secularisation is not inevitable if religious organisations adapt.
    Marking Points
    • Understanding of secularisation as the replacement of religion as the source of truth and moral values
    • Recognition of the relegation of religion to the personal sphere
    • Analysis of the rise of militant atheism and the view that religion is irrational
    • Evaluation of Christian responses to materialistic secular values, specifically regarding wealth and possessions
    • Knowledge of Alister McGrath’s defence of Christianity in 'The Dawkins Delusion'
    • Understanding of the emergence of new forms of expression such as Fresh Expressions and the House Church movement
    • Analysis of the emphasis on the social relevance of Christianity, including liberationist approaches supporting the poor and defending the oppressed
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Ensure all arguments are grounded in the British context as specified
    • 💡Use specific examples of new forms of Christian expression to support AO1 knowledge
    • 💡Critically evaluate the success of McGrath's arguments against militant atheism
    • 💡Connect the social relevance of Christianity to the broader theme of secularisation
    • 💡Always define 'secularisation' clearly in your essays, distinguishing between different dimensions (e.g., institutional, individual, societal). Use specific sociological evidence, such as census data or longitudinal studies, to support your arguments.
    • 💡Evaluate rather than describe. For top marks, critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of each theorist's position. For example, contrast Bruce's evidence of decline with Davie's 'believing without belonging' or Stark's religious economy model.
    • 💡Use contemporary examples to illustrate your points, such as the decline in Church of England baptisms or the rise of the 'nones' (those with no religion) in the 2021 UK census. This shows you can apply theory to real-world data.
    Common Mistakes
    • Failing to restrict the scope of the study to the British context
    • Confusing secularisation with secularism
    • Generalising Christian responses without referencing specific developments like Fresh Expressions or liberationist approaches
    • Neglecting to evaluate the effectiveness of the responses mentioned
    • Misconception: Secularisation means the end of all religion. Correction: Secularisation refers to the declining social significance of religion, not necessarily its disappearance. New forms of spirituality and non-institutional belief may still thrive.
    • Misconception: Church attendance figures alone prove secularisation. Correction: Attendance is one indicator, but belief, affiliation, and the influence of religion on public life must also be considered. Some argue that religion has changed form rather than declined.
    • Misconception: Secularisation is a uniform, global process. Correction: The secularisation thesis is primarily based on Western Europe. In other regions, such as the US or the Global South, religion remains vibrant, suggesting secularisation is not inevitable.
    Frequently Asked Questions
    What is the secularisation thesis in simple terms?
    The secularisation thesis argues that as society becomes more modern, scientific, and rational, religion loses its influence over people's lives and institutions. This means fewer people attend church, religious beliefs become less widespread, and religious organisations have less power in areas like politics and education. Key sociologists like Steve Bruce support this view, using evidence from declining church attendance in the UK.
    Is the UK a secular country?
    The UK is often described as secularising, but not fully secular. While church attendance has fallen sharply (e.g., only about 1% of Anglicans attend weekly services), many people still identify as Christian (46% in the 2021 census) and hold spiritual beliefs. However, the influence of Christianity on public life has declined, with fewer people marrying in church or sending children to Sunday school. The term 'believing without belonging' captures this paradox.
    What is the difference between 'believing without belonging' and 'belonging without believing'?
    'Believing without belonging' (Grace Davie) describes people who hold religious beliefs but do not participate in organised religion, such as attending church. 'Belonging without believing' (sometimes used by critics) refers to those who identify with a religion culturally (e.g., 'Catholic' or 'Anglican') but do not actually believe in its doctrines. Both concepts challenge simple secularisation narratives by showing that religion can persist in non-institutional forms.
    Why do some sociologists argue secularisation is not happening?
    Critics like Rodney Stark and William Bainbridge argue that religion is not declining but changing. Their 'religious economy' model suggests that religion persists because it offers 'compensators' for unmet needs. They point to the vitality of religion in the US and the growth of new religious movements. Others, like Grace Davie, highlight that belief remains widespread even if institutional participation drops. Additionally, the rise of fundamentalism globally shows religion's continued power.
    How does secularisation affect Christianity specifically?
    Secularisation has led to declining church attendance, fewer baptisms and confirmations, and a reduced role for Christian leaders in public debates. Many churches have closed or merged. However, Christianity has adapted through new forms like charismatic evangelicalism, which attracts younger members, and through involvement in social action (e.g., food banks). The Church of England has also modernised its liturgy and ordination of women. So while institutional decline is clear, Christianity remains culturally significant.
    What evidence do sociologists use to support secularisation?
    Key evidence includes falling church attendance (e.g., Church of England Sunday attendance dropped from 3.5 million in 1960 to under 1 million today), declining religious affiliation (the 'nones' rose from 25% in 2011 to 37% in 2021 in England and Wales), and reduced religious influence on laws (e.g., same-sex marriage legalisation). Sociologists also cite the differentiation of institutions, where religion no longer controls education, healthcare, or politics.