Religion and belief in 21st century conflict — AQA GCSE Religious Studies
Test yourself on Religion and belief in 21st century conflict with AQA GCSE practice questions.
Start free
7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge
Religion and belief in 21st century conflict explained
The Dhamma (Dharma) is a foundational concept in Buddhism, representing the universal truth, the Buddha's teachings, and the path to Enlightenment.
Read the full explanation
It encompasses the nature of reality, the human condition, and the ethical framework required to end suffering.
What to demonstrate
- Definition and understanding of the concept of Dhamma (Dharma)
- Explanation of dependent arising (paticcasamupada)
- Identification and explanation of the Three Marks of Existence: anicca, anatta, and dukkha
Show all 6 objectives
- Comparison of the human personality in Theravada (Five Aggregates) and Mahayana (sunyata, Buddha-nature) traditions
- Distinction between human destiny ideals: Arhat vs Bodhisattva
- Understanding of Buddhahood and the Pure Land
Religion and belief in 21st century conflict exam tips
Topic Overview
This topic explores the role of religion and belief in conflicts of the 21st century, focusing on how religious beliefs, identities, and institutions influence both the causes and resolutions of modern conflicts. You will examine case studies such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the role of religion in terrorism (e.g., ISIS), and religious peacebuilding efforts. The topic also considers secular ideologies like nationalism and how they interact with religious worldviews.
Understanding this topic is crucial because religion remains a powerful force in global affairs, often misunderstood as solely a cause of violence. You will learn to critically evaluate claims about religious wars, distinguish between religious and political motivations, and appreciate how faith can inspire both conflict and reconciliation. This knowledge helps you engage with current events and debates about extremism, freedom of religion, and multiculturalism.
Within the AQA GCSE Religious Studies course, this topic builds on your understanding of religious beliefs and practices, applying them to contemporary issues. It connects to themes of peace and conflict, human rights, and the relationship between religion and state. You will develop skills in source analysis, evaluation of different perspectives, and constructing balanced arguments—key for exam success.
Key Concepts
- →Just War Theory: A Christian doctrine outlining conditions for a war to be morally justifiable (e.g., legitimate authority, just cause, proportionality). Applied to modern conflicts like the Iraq War.
- →Holy War: A war fought for religious reasons, often promising spiritual rewards. Examples include the Crusades and contemporary jihadist rhetoric. Must be distinguished from political violence using religious language.
- →Religious Peacebuilding: Faith-based initiatives to resolve conflict, such as the Taizé Community's reconciliation work or the role of the Sant'Egidio Community in mediating peace talks.
- →Secularisation: The declining influence of religion in public life. In conflict contexts, this can reduce religious tensions but also remove moral frameworks for peace.
- →Religious Identity: How belonging to a faith group can become a marker of identity in conflicts (e.g., Catholic vs. Protestant in Northern Ireland, Muslim vs. Hindu in Kashmir).
Marking Points
- Definition and understanding of the concept of Dhamma (Dharma)
- Explanation of dependent arising (paticcasamupada)
- Identification and explanation of the Three Marks of Existence: anicca, anatta, and dukkha
- Comparison of the human personality in Theravada (Five Aggregates) and Mahayana (sunyata, Buddha-nature) traditions
- Distinction between human destiny ideals: Arhat vs Bodhisattva
- Understanding of Buddhahood and the Pure Land
Examiner Tips
- 💡Ensure you can clearly define the Three Marks of Existence and provide examples for each
- 💡Use precise terminology when discussing the Five Aggregates
- 💡Be prepared to compare and contrast Theravada and Mahayana views on the human personality and the ideal of the enlightened person
- 💡Link the concept of Dhamma to the broader Buddhist path to Enlightenment
- 💡Use specific examples: Refer to named conflicts (e.g., Syria, Myanmar) and religious actors (e.g., Pope Francis, Dalai Lama). Avoid vague statements like 'some religions'—be precise.
- 💡Evaluate different perspectives: In 12-mark questions, show you understand both religious and secular viewpoints. For instance, compare a Christian just war argument with a humanist pacifist view.
- 💡Link to key terms: Always define and apply concepts like 'holy war', 'pacifism', and 'reconciliation'. This demonstrates depth of knowledge and helps structure your answer.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing the Theravada concept of the Five Aggregates with Mahayana concepts like sunyata
- Failing to distinguish between the Arhat and Bodhisattva ideals
- Misinterpreting the Three Marks of Existence as separate concepts rather than interconnected aspects of reality
- Overlooking the specific differences between Theravada and Mahayana perspectives on human personality and destiny
- Misconception: All conflicts involving religion are 'religious wars'. Correction: Many conflicts have political, economic, or ethnic roots, with religion used as a rallying cry or justification. For example, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is primarily about land and national identity, not solely religious differences.
- Misconception: Religion always causes violence. Correction: Religion can also be a force for peace. Many religious leaders and organisations actively work to end conflicts, such as the Interfaith Peacebuilding Initiative in Nigeria.
- Misconception: Just War Theory is universally accepted by Christians. Correction: There is debate among Christians; some denominations (e.g., Quakers) are pacifist and reject all war, while others interpret the criteria differently.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is religion the main cause of conflict in the 21st century?
No, most 21st-century conflicts have multiple causes, including political power struggles, economic inequality, and ethnic tensions. Religion often becomes a marker of identity or a tool for mobilisation rather than the root cause. For example, the Syrian civil war began with protests against the government, not religious differences, though sectarian identities (Alawite vs. Sunni) later intensified the conflict.
What is the difference between a just war and a holy war?
A just war is a war that meets specific moral criteria (e.g., just cause, legitimate authority, proportionality) and is considered permissible under certain conditions, mainly in Christian ethics. A holy war is fought for religious reasons, often seen as a divine command, and may promise spiritual rewards like martyrdom. Holy wars are typically total and lack the restrictions of just war theory. For example, the Crusades were considered holy wars, while the Falklands War was debated as a just war.
How do religious groups promote peace in conflicts?
Religious groups promote peace through interfaith dialogue, mediation, and humanitarian aid. For instance, the Community of Sant'Egidio has mediated peace agreements in Mozambique and Algeria. Religious leaders can also use their moral authority to call for ceasefires, as Pope Francis did during the Ukraine conflict. Additionally, faith-based organisations often run reconciliation programmes that bring together divided communities.
Does the Just War Theory still apply to modern warfare?
Yes, but it faces challenges. Modern warfare includes non-state actors (e.g., terrorist groups), drones, and cyberattacks, which complicate criteria like 'legitimate authority' and 'discrimination'. Some argue the theory needs updating, while others say its principles (e.g., proportionality) remain relevant. For example, the use of drones raises questions about whether they can discriminate between combatants and civilians.
Why do some people think religion causes more harm than good in conflicts?
This view often stems from high-profile cases where religion is used to justify violence, such as 9/11 or the Islamic State. Critics argue that religious absolutism can lead to intolerance and conflict. However, this overlooks the many peacebuilding roles of religion and the fact that most religious people condemn violence. It's important to distinguish between the actions of extremists and the broader religious tradition.
What role does secularism play in reducing religious conflict?
Secularism can reduce religious conflict by separating religion from state power, preventing any one faith from dominating. For example, India's secular constitution aims to protect religious minorities. However, secularism can also provoke backlash if seen as suppressing religious identity. In some cases, such as France's ban on religious symbols in schools, it has created new tensions. So, secularism is not a guaranteed solution.