Religion, violence, terrorism and war — AQA GCSE Religious Studies
Test yourself on Religion, violence, terrorism and war with AQA GCSE practice questions.
Start free
7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge
Religion, violence, terrorism and war explained
The Dhamma (Dharma) is a foundational concept in Buddhism, representing the universal truth, the Buddha's teachings, and the path to Enlightenment.
Read the full explanation
It encompasses the nature of reality, the human condition, and the ethical framework required to end suffering.
What to demonstrate
- Definition and understanding of the concept of Dhamma (Dharma)
- Explanation of dependent arising (paticcasamupada)
- Identification and explanation of the Three Marks of Existence: anicca, anatta, and dukkha
Show all 6 objectives
- Comparison of the human personality in Theravada (Five Aggregates) and Mahayana (sunyata, Buddha-nature) traditions
- Distinction between human destiny ideals: Arhat vs Bodhisattva
- Understanding of Buddhahood and the Pure Land
Religion, violence, terrorism and war exam tips
Topic Overview
This topic explores the complex relationship between religion, violence, terrorism, and war. You'll examine religious teachings on peace and conflict, the just war theory, holy war, pacifism, and how religious texts and leaders have been used to justify both violence and peacemaking. Understanding these ideas is crucial for evaluating arguments about religion's role in global conflicts and for forming your own reasoned views.
The AQA GCSE specification requires you to study Christian and Muslim perspectives on war and peace, including key teachings from the Bible and Qur'an. You'll also consider non-religious ethical approaches, such as utilitarianism and human rights. This topic connects to broader themes of good and evil, human rights, and social justice, and it helps you engage critically with current affairs like terrorism and international conflicts.
Mastering this topic will enable you to analyse sources of authority, evaluate different ethical stances, and construct balanced arguments. You'll learn to distinguish between just and unjust wars, understand the conditions for a just war, and explore why some believers choose pacifism while others support armed conflict. This knowledge is essential for exam success and for becoming an informed global citizen.
Key Concepts
- →Just War Theory: A set of criteria (just cause, legitimate authority, right intention, etc.) developed by Christian thinkers like Augustine and Aquinas to determine when war is morally permissible.
- →Holy War: A war fought for religious reasons, often believed to be commanded by God. In Islam, this is linked to the concept of jihad, which has both a greater (spiritual struggle) and lesser (armed struggle) meaning.
- →Pacifism: The belief that violence is always wrong. Christian pacifists, like Quakers, follow Jesus' teaching to 'love your enemies' and turn the other cheek.
- →Terrorism: The use of violence against civilians for political or religious aims. Most religious leaders condemn terrorism, but some extremists misuse religious texts to justify it.
Marking Points
- Definition and understanding of the concept of Dhamma (Dharma)
- Explanation of dependent arising (paticcasamupada)
- Identification and explanation of the Three Marks of Existence: anicca, anatta, and dukkha
- Comparison of the human personality in Theravada (Five Aggregates) and Mahayana (sunyata, Buddha-nature) traditions
- Distinction between human destiny ideals: Arhat vs Bodhisattva
- Understanding of Buddhahood and the Pure Land
Examiner Tips
- 💡Ensure you can clearly define the Three Marks of Existence and provide examples for each
- 💡Use precise terminology when discussing the Five Aggregates
- 💡Be prepared to compare and contrast Theravada and Mahayana views on the human personality and the ideal of the enlightened person
- 💡Link the concept of Dhamma to the broader Buddhist path to Enlightenment
- 💡Use specific religious teachings and sources of authority (e.g., Bible verses, Qur'anic quotes) to support your points. For example, quote 'Blessed are the peacemakers' (Matthew 5:9) when discussing Christian pacifism.
- 💡Show evaluation by comparing different viewpoints. For a 12-mark question, aim to discuss at least two contrasting perspectives (e.g., just war vs. pacifism) and give a reasoned conclusion.
- 💡Define key terms accurately in your answers. If the question mentions 'holy war', explain what it means and give an example, such as the Crusades or the concept of jihad in Islam.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing the Theravada concept of the Five Aggregates with Mahayana concepts like sunyata
- Failing to distinguish between the Arhat and Bodhisattva ideals
- Misinterpreting the Three Marks of Existence as separate concepts rather than interconnected aspects of reality
- Overlooking the specific differences between Theravada and Mahayana perspectives on human personality and destiny
- Misconception: 'Jihad means holy war against non-Muslims.' Correction: Jihad primarily means 'struggle' in Arabic. The greater jihad is the personal struggle to live a good Muslim life; the lesser jihad is armed struggle, which has strict rules about non-combatants and proportionality.
- Misconception: 'All Christians are pacifists.' Correction: While some Christians are pacifists, many support just war theory, which allows war under certain conditions. The Church of England, for example, affirms both pacifism and just war as valid Christian responses.
- Misconception: 'Religion is the main cause of war.' Correction: Wars often have multiple causes, including political, economic, and social factors. Religion can be a factor, but it is rarely the sole cause. Many wars are fought for territory, resources, or power.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between just war and holy war?
Just war theory is a set of ethical criteria developed by Christian philosophers to determine when it is morally acceptable to go to war. It includes conditions like just cause, legitimate authority, and proportionality. Holy war, on the other hand, is a war fought for religious reasons, often believed to be commanded by God. In Islam, holy war is linked to the concept of jihad, but it must still follow strict rules about conduct and non-combatants. The key difference is that just war is about moral justification, while holy war is about religious duty.
Do all Muslims support terrorism?
No, the vast majority of Muslims condemn terrorism. The Qur'an explicitly forbids killing innocent people (e.g., 5:32: 'whoever kills a soul... it is as if he had slain mankind entirely'). Terrorist groups like ISIS misuse religious texts to justify violence, but mainstream Islamic scholars reject their interpretations. In fact, many Muslims are victims of terrorism themselves.
What do Christians believe about war?
Christian views on war vary. Some Christians, like Quakers, are pacifists and believe all war is wrong, following Jesus' teaching to 'love your enemies' (Matthew 5:44). Others support just war theory, which allows war if it meets certain conditions (e.g., to protect the innocent). The Catholic Church teaches that war should be a last resort and that non-combatants must be protected. Most Christians agree that peace is the ideal, but they differ on whether war can ever be justified.
How can religion cause peace?
Religion can promote peace through teachings about love, forgiveness, and reconciliation. For example, Christianity teaches 'blessed are the peacemakers' (Matthew 5:9), and Islam emphasises mercy and justice. Religious leaders often mediate conflicts, and interfaith dialogue can reduce tensions. Many religious charities work to rebuild communities after war. However, religion can also be misused to justify violence, so it's important to distinguish between authentic faith and extremist interpretations.
What is the just war theory?
Just war theory is a doctrine that sets out conditions for a war to be morally justifiable. It has two parts: jus ad bellum (right to go to war) and jus in bello (right conduct in war). Conditions include: just cause (e.g., self-defence), legitimate authority (e.g., a government), right intention (to restore peace), proportionality (benefits outweigh harm), and last resort. The theory was developed by Christian thinkers like Augustine and Aquinas and is still used today in international law.
Why do some people use religion to justify violence?
Some individuals and groups selectively interpret religious texts to support their political or ideological goals. They may take verses out of context, ignore teachings on peace and mercy, and claim divine authority for their actions. For example, the Crusaders used Christian symbols to justify war, and modern extremists like ISIS misuse Islamic concepts like jihad. However, mainstream religious leaders condemn such interpretations, and most believers see violence as contrary to their faith's core values.