History A-Level
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation
What De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation means in History A-Level, as defined for AQA.
Definition of De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation
Check what you remember
Read the wording for your board, then hide it and explain De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation in your own words. Rough notes are fine. This is a self-check, with no mark or grade.
Reference: AQA
The South enforced strict Jim Crow segregation, while the North offered de facto segregation but greater economic opportunity.
Topics that use De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation
- 2Q The American Dream: reality and illusion, 1945–1980 – Eisenhower: tranquility and crisis, 1952–1960 (AQA A-Level)
Related terms
- Dynamic conservatism
- Economic prosperity
- Grassroots Activism vs. Federal Action
- Inequality
- Political Realignment and Party Factions
- Social conformity
- States' Rights vs. Federal Authority
- Suburbanisation
Using De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation in the exam
Check the command word and mark scheme for your exact question. After comparing your explanation with the reference, use the term in an answer on the linked topic. This practice does not predict an exam mark.
Practise History questions
Create a free account to answer exam-style questions on this topic and get feedback on your answers.
Start free
All History A-Level termsA week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge