History A-Level
Judicial endorsement of segregation and disenfranchisement
What Judicial endorsement of segregation and disenfranchisement means in History A-Level, as defined for Pearson Edexcel.
Definition of Judicial endorsement of segregation and disenfranchisement
Check what you remember
Read the wording for your board, then hide it and explain Judicial endorsement of segregation and disenfranchisement in your own words. Rough notes are fine. This is a self-check, with no mark or grade.
Reference: Pearson Edexcel
The Supreme Court upheld a railway segregation law, voter registration provisions and a school board decision, legitimising segregation and disenfranchisement.
Topics that use Judicial endorsement of segregation and disenfranchisement
- Paper 3, Option 39.1: Civil rights and race relations in the USA, 1850–2009 - 2 The triumph of ‘Jim Crow’, 1883–c1900 (Pearson Edexcel A-Level)
Related terms
- Federal retreat from civil rights protection
- Grandfather clause
- Judicial interpretation and civil rights
- Legal segregation
- The ‘separate but equal’ doctrine and its consequences
- The legal entrenchment of white supremacy in the South
- Voter suppression
- Federalism and the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment
Using Judicial endorsement of segregation and disenfranchisement in the exam
Check the command word and mark scheme for your exact question. After comparing your explanation with the reference, use the term in an answer on the linked topic. This practice does not predict an exam mark.
Practise History questions
Create a free account to answer exam-style questions on this topic and get feedback on your answers.
Start free
All History A-Level termsA week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge