Philosophy A-Level
Cognitivism vs. Non-cognitivism
What Cognitivism vs. Non-cognitivism means in Philosophy A-Level, as defined for AQA.
Definitions of Cognitivism vs. Non-cognitivism
Exam boards and our study guides word this term in slightly different ways. Learn the version your board uses.
The semantic debate regarding whether moral statements function as truth-apt propositions (Cognitivism) or as expressions of non-cognitive attitudes such as emotions or prescriptions (Non-cognitivism).
The fundamental debate regarding whether religious assertions function as truth-apt propositions describing objective reality or as non-truth-apt expressions of emotion, attitude, or moral commitment.
Topics that use Cognitivism vs. Non-cognitivism
- Metaphysics of God (AQA A-Level)
- Moral philosophy (AQA A-Level)
Related terms
- A Priori vs A Posteriori Proofs
- Categorical Imperative
- Ethical Naturalism vs. Non-naturalism
- Good Will
- Moral Realism vs. Anti-realism
- Moral Status and Personhood
- Normative Application
- Phronesis (Practical Wisdom)
Using Cognitivism vs. Non-cognitivism in the exam
Definition questions usually carry one or two marks, and examiners look for the precise wording. Write the definition from memory, check it against the version above, and then use the term in a longer answer on the same topic so it sticks.
Practise Philosophy questions
Create a free account to answer exam-style questions on this topic and get feedback on your answers.
Start free
All Philosophy A-Level terms7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge