Fact-stating versus expressive accounts
What Fact-stating versus expressive accounts means in Philosophy A-Level, as defined for AQA.
Definition of Fact-stating versus expressive accounts
Check what you remember
Read the wording for your board, then hide it and explain Fact-stating versus expressive accounts in your own words. Rough notes are fine. This is a self-check, with no mark or grade.
Reference: AQA
The contrast between treating religious utterances as describing reality and treating them as expressing attitudes, commitments or emotions rather than factual beliefs.
Topics that use Fact-stating versus expressive accounts
- Religious language (AQA A-Level)
Related terms
- Cognitivism
- Contrast between verification and falsification
- Falsification principle
- Non-cognitivism
- Parable of the Partisan
- Provisional belief versus unfalsifiable blik
- The verification principle
- Trust and commitment
Using Fact-stating versus expressive accounts in the exam
Check the command word and mark scheme for your exact question. After comparing your explanation with the reference, use the term in an answer on the linked topic. This practice does not predict an exam mark.
Practise Philosophy questions
Create a free account to answer exam-style questions on this topic and get feedback on your answers.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge