AQA · GCSE · Business

    Course version: 8132 · Version from Sept 2017

    Students should recognise that the benefits of reduced costs must be…

    Full specification wording

    The role of procurement: Students should recognise that the benefits of reduced costs must be balanced against the quality of service.

    Cutting procurement costs can improve profit, but it can also damage the quality of service the business receives or gives.

    Checked against the AQA 8132 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 16 of 21
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    Cutting procurement costs can improve profit, but it can also damage the quality of service the business receives or gives. A business might switch to a cheaper supplier and save money, yet receive slower deliveries, less reliable components or poorer after-sales support. That can lead to production delays, faulty products, unhappy customers and lost repeat sales, which may cost more than the original saving.

    For example: A hotel that buys cheaper food may reduce its costs but serve poorer meals and lose bookings.

    What earns the marks

    • Identifies a specific benefit of reduced procurement costs, such as higher profit, lower unit cost or a more competitive price.
    • Identifies a specific quality-of-service risk, such as unreliable delivery, poorer materials or weaker after-sales support.
    • Explains the chain of consequences from poor supplier quality to customer dissatisfaction, lost sales or reputational damage.
    • Weighs the cost saving against the quality risk and reaches a supported judgement rather than listing points.
    • Uses a relevant business example or context to show how the balance might differ between businesses.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Listing benefits and drawbacks without comparing them.

      Put it right: State which effect is likely to be greater and why.

    • Assuming cheaper always means worse quality.

      Put it right: Quality must be judged on evidence such as delivery reliability, defect rates and customer feedback.

    • Ignoring the effect on the business's own customers.

      Put it right: Trace how supplier quality affects the final product or service and therefore sales.

    Exam tips

    • Use connectives such as however, therefore and this depends on to show the balance between cost and quality.
    • Anchor the answer in the case study or a named business so the judgement is contextual rather than generic.
    • Finish with a clear conclusion that states whether the cost saving is justified and the condition under which that holds.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the The role of procurement: Students should recognise that the benefits of reduced costs must be balanced against the quality of service. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    A hotel switches to a cheaper laundry supplier to reduce its costs. Which statement best describes what the hotel should consider before making this change?

    Listen

    Cutting procurement costs can improve profit, but it can also damage the quality of service the business receives or gives. A business might switch to a cheaper supplier and save money, yet receive slower deliveries, less reliable components or poorer after-sales support. That can lead to production delays, faulty products, unhappy customers and lost repeat sales, which may cost more than the original saving. For example, a hotel that buys cheaper food may reduce its costs but serve poorer meals and lose bookings. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Identifies a specific benefit of reduced procurement costs, such as higher profit, lower unit cost or a more competitive price. Identifies a specific quality-of-service risk, such as unreliable delivery, poorer materials or weaker after-sales support. Explains the chain of consequences from poor supplier quality to customer dissatisfaction, lost sales or reputational damage. Weighs the cost saving against the quality risk and reaches a supported judgement rather than listing points. A common slip: Listing benefits and drawbacks without comparing them. Instead, state which effect is likely to be greater and why. Exam tip: Use connectives such as however, therefore and this depends on to show the balance between cost and quality.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart. The top node 'Reduced procurement costs' splits into two branches. The left branch leads to 'Financial benefit: higher profit'. The right branch leads to 'Cheaper supplier', which leads to 'Slower deliveries, less reliable components, poorer after-sales support', then to 'Production delays and faulty products', then to 'Unhappy customers and lost repeat sales', then to 'May cost more than the original saving'. Both the financial benefit node and the final cost node lead into 'Weigh saving against quality of service', which leads to 'Supported judgement: is the saving worthwhile?'.
    It shows how reduced procurement costs bring a financial benefit but can lead through poorer supplier quality to customer dissatisfaction and lost sales, which must be weighed in a judgement.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Cost versus quality trade-off

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Supplier reliability and service levels

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Customer satisfaction and reputation

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Decision making and judgement

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Cost versus quality trade-off
    The benefits of reduced costs must be balanced against the quality of service.
    Supplier reliability and service levels
    A cheaper supplier may bring slower deliveries, less reliable components or poorer after-sales support.
    Customer satisfaction and reputation
    Poor supplier quality can lead to production delays, faulty products, unhappy customers and lost repeat sales.
    Decision making and judgement
    Both sides should be weighed, the financial benefit of reduced costs against the effect on quality of service, to reach a supported judgement about whether the saving is worthwhile.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart. The top node 'Reduced procurement costs' splits into two branches. The left branch leads to 'Financial benefit: higher profit'. The right branch leads to 'Cheaper supplier', which leads to 'Slower deliveries, less reliable components, poorer after-sales support', then to 'Production delays and faulty products', then to 'Unhappy customers and lost repeat sales', then to 'May cost more than the original saving'. Both the financial benefit node and the final cost node lead into 'Weigh saving against quality of service', which leads to 'Supported judgement: is the saving worthwhile?'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of The role of procurement: Students should recognise that the benefits of reduced costs must be balanced against the quality of service.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge