AQA · A-Level · Geography

    Course version: 7037 · Version from Sept 2018

    Population, resources and pollution model: positive and negative feedback.…

    Full specification wording

    Principles of population ecology and their application to human populations: Population, resources and pollution model: positive and negative feedback. Contrasting perspectives on population growth and its implications; Malthusian, neo-Malthusian and alternatives such as associated with Boserup and Simon.

    The Population, Resources and Pollution (PRP) model maps interactions between demographics and the environment.

    Checked against the AQA 7037 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 2 of 2
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    The Population, Resources and Pollution (PRP) model maps interactions between demographics and the environment. Positive feedback amplifies changes: population growth drives resource extraction, increasing pollution and degrading resources. Negative feedback dampens effects: severe pollution increases mortality, reducing population and resource pressure. Malthus posits that geometric population growth outstrips arithmetic food supply, causing famine. Neo-Malthusians apply this to all finite resources, predicting systemic collapse. Conversely, Boserup argues population pressure drives agricultural innovation, while Simon views human ingenuity as the ultimate resource, ensuring technological solutions will always overcome resource depletion.

    What earns the marks

    • Explain the PRP model by detailing how population size, resource acquisition, and pollution generation are interconnected.
    • Distinguish between positive feedback (e.g., agricultural expansion causing soil degradation, requiring more land clearance) and negative feedback (e.g., resource scarcity reducing birth rates).
    • Contrast Malthusian 'limits to growth' perspectives with the optimistic, technocentric views of Boserup and Simon.
    • Evaluate the relevance of neo-Malthusian models, such as the Club of Rome's Limits to Growth, in the context of modern global resource consumption.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Confusing positive and negative feedback.

      Put it right: Positive feedback amplifies a change in the PRP model, whereas negative feedback restores balance or dampens the change.

    • Treating Malthusian and neo-Malthusian theories as identical.

      Put it right: Malthus focused primarily on food supply, whereas neo-Malthusians consider a broader range of environmental limits and resources.

    • Misattributing theories; stating Boserup believed in inevitable population collapse, when she actually argued that population growth stimulates agricultural innovation.

    Exam tips

    • Use specific historical or contemporary examples, such as the Green Revolution, to evaluate Boserup's theory of induced innovation.
    • When discussing the PRP model, clearly draw out the feedback loops using step-by-step logical chains to show how one variable affects another.
    • Compare and contrast the theories directly in essay questions rather than discussing them in isolation, highlighting their differing views on human carrying capacity.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Principles of population ecology and their application to human populations: Population, resources and pollution model: positive and negative feedback. Contrasting perspectives on population growth and its implications; Malthusian, neo-Malthusian and alternatives such as associated with Boserup and Simon. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which of the following best describes the core perspective of Ester Boserup regarding population growth and resources?

    Listen

    The Population, Resources and Pollution (PRP) model maps interactions between demographics and the environment. Positive feedback amplifies changes: population growth drives resource extraction, increasing pollution and degrading resources. Negative feedback dampens effects: severe pollution increases mortality, reducing population and resource pressure. Malthus posits that geometric population growth outstrips arithmetic food supply, causing famine. Neo-Malthusians apply this to all finite resources, predicting systemic collapse. Conversely, Boserup argues population pressure drives agricultural innovation, while Simon views human ingenuity as the ultimate resource, ensuring technological solutions will always overcome resource depletion. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explain the PRP model by detailing how population size, resource acquisition, and pollution generation are interconnected. Distinguish between positive feedback (e.g., agricultural expansion causing soil degradation, requiring more land clearance) and negative feedback (e.g., resource scarcity reducing birth rates). Contrast Malthusian 'limits to growth' perspectives with the optimistic, technocentric views of Boserup and Simon. Evaluate the relevance of neo-Malthusian models, such as the Club of Rome's Limits to Growth, in the context of modern global resource consumption. Exam tip: Use specific historical or contemporary examples, such as the Green Revolution, to evaluate Boserup's theory of induced innovation.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Positive feedback

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Negative feedback

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Malthusian

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Neo-Malthusian

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Positive feedback
    In the PRP model, a process that amplifies changes, as when population growth drives resource extraction, increasing pollution and degrading resources.
    Negative feedback
    A process that dampens effects, as when severe pollution increases mortality, reducing population and resource pressure.
    Malthusian
    The view that geometric population growth outstrips arithmetic food supply, causing famine.
    Neo-Malthusian
    The application of Malthusian thinking to all finite resources, predicting systemic collapse.

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Principles of population ecology and their application to human populations: Population, resources and pollution model: positive and negative feedback. Contrasting perspectives on population growth and its implications; Malthusian, neo-Malthusian and alternatives such as associated with Boserup and Simon.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge