AQA · A-Level · Geography

    Course version: 7037 · Version from Sept 2018

    Impacts and human responses as evidenced by a recent seismic event.

    Full specification wording

    Seismic hazards: Impacts and human responses as evidenced by a recent seismic event.

    This case study must demonstrate specific impacts and human responses.

    Checked against the AQA 7037 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 3 of 3
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    This case study must demonstrate specific impacts and human responses. For example, the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake in Japan illustrates severe primary impacts like ground shaking and devastating secondary impacts via a tsunami. Human responses must be evaluated, contrasting immediate actions like the deployment of the Self-Defence Forces with long-term recovery such as rebuilding higher sea walls. The chosen event should highlight how a country's level of development, governance, and prior preparedness influence both the scale of the impacts and the effectiveness of the subsequent human responses.

    What earns the marks

    • Provide specific, quantifiable data from a chosen recent seismic event (e.g., magnitude, death toll, economic cost in US dollars).
    • Detail the specific primary and secondary impacts unique to the chosen case study, linking them to the tectonic setting.
    • Analyse the timeline of human responses, distinguishing between immediate emergency relief and long-term reconstruction efforts.
    • Evaluate how the specific geographical context (e.g., level of development, population density) influenced the severity of impacts and the success of responses.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Using an outdated case study.

      Put it right: Select a recent seismic event (ideally post-2000) to ensure relevance to modern hazard management and technology.

    • Providing generic impacts without specific evidence.

      Put it right: Include precise facts, figures, and named locations relevant to the specific seismic event.

    • Failing to evaluate the response.

      Put it right: Move beyond merely describing what happened by assessing the success or failure of the human responses.

    Exam tips

    • Memorise 5 to 7 key statistics for your chosen case study to provide concrete evidence in essay questions.
    • Contrast your recent seismic event with another event in a country with a different level of development to highlight the role of vulnerability.
    • Ensure you can discuss both the physical causes of the event and the human factors that turned the hazard into a disaster.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Seismic hazards: Impacts and human responses as evidenced by a recent seismic event. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    During the 2011 Tohoku earthquake in Japan, which of the following was a major secondary environmental and economic impact?

    Listen

    This case study must demonstrate specific impacts and human responses. For example, the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake in Japan illustrates severe primary impacts like ground shaking and devastating secondary impacts via a tsunami. Human responses must be evaluated, contrasting immediate actions like the deployment of the Self-Defence Forces with long-term recovery such as rebuilding higher sea walls. The chosen event should highlight how a country's level of development, governance, and prior preparedness influence both the scale of the impacts and the effectiveness of the subsequent human responses. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Provide specific, quantifiable data from a chosen recent seismic event (e.g., magnitude, death toll, economic cost in US dollars). Detail the specific primary and secondary impacts unique to the chosen case study, linking them to the tectonic setting. Analyse the timeline of human responses, distinguishing between immediate emergency relief and long-term reconstruction efforts. Evaluate how the specific geographical context (e.g., level of development, population density) influenced the severity of impacts and the success of responses. A common slip: Using an outdated case study. Instead, select a recent seismic event (ideally post-2000) to ensure relevance to modern hazard management and technology. Exam tip: Memorise 5 to 7 key statistics for your chosen case study to provide concrete evidence in essay questions.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart. At the top, a node labelled "Recent seismic event" branches into two nodes: "Primary impacts: ground shaking" and "Secondary impacts: tsunami". Both of these feed into a single node labelled "Impacts". The "Impacts" node leads to a node labelled "Human responses", which branches into two nodes: "Immediate actions: deployment of Self-Defence Forces" and "Long-term recovery: rebuilding higher sea walls". A separate node on the left, labelled "Level of development, governance and prior preparedness", has arrows pointing into both the "Impacts" node and the "Human responses" node, showing that these factors influence both the scale of impacts and the effectiveness of responses.
    Shows how a recent seismic event produces primary and secondary impacts, which prompt immediate and long-term human responses, with development, governance and preparedness influencing both.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Case Study Application

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Human-Environment Interaction

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Development and Vulnerability

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Disaster Response

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Case Study Application
    Analysing a recent seismic event, typically one occurring within the last thirty years, to demonstrate specific impacts and human responses.
    Human-Environment Interaction
    How a country's level of development, governance and prior preparedness influence both the scale of impacts and the effectiveness of subsequent human responses.
    Development and Vulnerability
    The way a country's level of development, governance and prior preparedness shape the severity of impacts and the success of responses to a seismic event.
    Disaster Response
    Human responses evaluated by contrasting immediate actions, such as deployment of the Self-Defence Forces, with long-term recovery such as rebuilding higher sea walls.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart. At the top, a node labelled "Recent seismic event" branches into two nodes: "Primary impacts: ground shaking" and "Secondary impacts: tsunami". Both of these feed into a single node labelled "Impacts". The "Impacts" node leads to a node labelled "Human responses", which branches into two nodes: "Immediate actions: deployment of Self-Defence Forces" and "Long-term recovery: rebuilding higher sea walls". A separate node on the left, labelled "Level of development, governance and prior preparedness", has arrows pointing into both the "Impacts" node and the "Human responses" node, showing that these factors influence both the scale of impacts and the effectiveness of responses.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Seismic hazards: Impacts and human responses as evidenced by a recent seismic event.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge