AQA · A-Level · History

    Course version: 7042 · Version from Sept 2017

    Government and Tsars: Alexander II and Alexander III as rulers; attitudes…

    Full specification wording

    1H Tsarist and Communist Russia, 1855–1964 – Trying to preserve autocracy, 1855–1894: Government and Tsars: Alexander II and Alexander III as rulers; attitudes to and imposition of autocracy; key developments

    Alexander II and Alexander III both fundamentally believed in their divine right to rule, yet their methods of imposing autocracy differed.

    Checked against the AQA 7042 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 3 of 6
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    Alexander II and Alexander III both fundamentally believed in their divine right to rule, yet their methods of imposing autocracy differed. Alexander II initially adopted reformist policies, such as the 1861 Emancipation Edict and creating the Zemstva, believing reform from above would prevent revolution. However, following assassination attempts, he reverted to reactionary measures. Conversely, Alexander III's attitude was staunchly conservative. Following his father's 1881 assassination, he imposed autocracy through the Statute of State Security, expanding the Okhrana's powers and introducing Land Captains to override local Zemstva. Key developments include this shift from reform to reaction under Alexander II and the systematic repression under Alexander III, both aiming to preserve absolute Tsarist authority.

    What earns the marks

    • Assess Alexander II's initial reforms, such as the Emancipation of the Serfs and the creation of the Zemstva, as methods intended to strengthen rather than dismantle autocracy.
    • Evaluate the turning point in Alexander II's reign, noting how assassination attempts prompted reactionary appointments and a tightening of state control.
    • Analyse Alexander III's 1881 Manifesto of Unshakable Autocracy and the Statute of State Security as direct, uncompromising impositions of absolute rule.
    • Examine the role of the Okhrana and the 1889 introduction of Land Captains in centralising control and suppressing local opposition under Alexander III.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Claiming Alexander II wanted to establish a democracy.

      Put it right: He reformed solely to preserve autocracy and prevent a bottom-up revolution.

    • Viewing Alexander II's reign as entirely reformist.

      Put it right: He became highly reactionary in his later years following multiple assassination attempts.

    • Assuming Alexander III reversed all of his father's economic policies.

      Put it right: While politically reactionary, he allowed economic modernisation under ministers like Bunge and Vyshnegradsky.

    Exam tips

    • Contrast the differing methods used by both Tsars to achieve the same ultimate goal: the preservation of autocratic power.
    • Use specific legislation, such as the 1881 Statute of State Security, to demonstrate how Alexander III practically imposed his autocratic will.
    • When evaluating 'key developments', structure your argument around the shift from reform to reaction across the period 1855 to 1894.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the 1H Tsarist and Communist Russia, 1855–1964 – Trying to preserve autocracy, 1855–1894: Government and Tsars: Alexander II and Alexander III as rulers; attitudes to and imposition of autocracy; key developments lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which of the following documents, issued in 1881, clearly demonstrated Alexander III's rejection of political reform and his commitment to absolute rule?

    Listen

    Alexander II and Alexander III both fundamentally believed in their divine right to rule, yet their methods of imposing autocracy differed. Alexander II initially adopted reformist policies, such as the 1861 Emancipation Edict and creating the Zemstva, believing reform from above would prevent revolution. However, following assassination attempts, he reverted to reactionary measures. Conversely, Alexander III's attitude was staunchly conservative. Following his father's 1881 assassination, he imposed autocracy through the Statute of State Security, expanding the Okhrana's powers and introducing Land Captains to override local Zemstva. Key developments include this shift from reform to reaction under Alexander II and the systematic repression under Alexander III, both aiming to preserve absolute Tsarist authority. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Assess Alexander II's initial reforms, such as the Emancipation of the Serfs and the creation of the Zemstva, as methods intended to strengthen rather than dismantle autocracy. Evaluate the turning point in Alexander II's reign, noting how assassination attempts prompted reactionary appointments and a tightening of state control. Analyse Alexander III's 1881 Manifesto of Unshakable Autocracy and the Statute of State Security as direct, uncompromising impositions of absolute rule. Examine the role of the Okhrana and the 1889 introduction of Land Captains in centralising control and suppressing local opposition under Alexander III. Exam tip: Contrast the differing methods used by both Tsars to achieve the same ultimate goal: the preservation of autocratic power.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart. At the top, a node reading 'Belief in divine right to rule' branches into two nodes: 'Alexander II' and 'Alexander III'. From 'Alexander II', one path leads to 'Initial reformist policies', which leads to 'Reform from above to prevent revolution'. Another path from 'Alexander II' leads to 'Assassination attempts', which leads to 'Reversion to reactionary measures'. From 'Alexander III', a path leads to 'Staunchly conservative attitude', which leads to 'Statute of State Security'. That node then branches into 'Expanded Okhrana powers' and 'Land Captains override local Zemstva'. Both 'Reversion to reactionary measures' and 'Land Captains override local Zemstva' lead to a final node reading 'Preservation of absolute Tsarist authority'.
    It shows how both Alexander II and Alexander III, sharing a belief in divine right, used differing methods — reform then reaction, and systematic repression — to preserve absolute Tsarist authority.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Autocracy and Dictatorship

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Reform vs Reaction

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    State Control and Repression

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Continuity and Change

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Autocracy and Dictatorship
    Both Tsars fundamentally believed in their divine right to rule and aimed to preserve absolute Tsarist authority.
    Reform vs Reaction
    Alexander II initially adopted reformist policies, believing reform from above would prevent revolution, but reverted to reactionary measures following assassination attempts.
    State Control and Repression
    Alexander III imposed autocracy through the Statute of State Security, expanding the Okhrana's powers and introducing Land Captains to override local Zemstva.
    Continuity and Change
    Key developments include the shift from reform to reaction under Alexander II and the systematic repression under Alexander III, both aiming to preserve autocracy.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart. At the top, a node reading 'Belief in divine right to rule' branches into two nodes: 'Alexander II' and 'Alexander III'. From 'Alexander II', one path leads to 'Initial reformist policies', which leads to 'Reform from above to prevent revolution'. Another path from 'Alexander II' leads to 'Assassination attempts', which leads to 'Reversion to reactionary measures'. From 'Alexander III', a path leads to 'Staunchly conservative attitude', which leads to 'Statute of State Security'. That node then branches into 'Expanded Okhrana powers' and 'Land Captains override local Zemstva'. Both 'Reversion to reactionary measures' and 'Land Captains override local Zemstva' lead to a final node reading 'Preservation of absolute Tsarist authority'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of 1H Tsarist and Communist Russia, 1855–1964 – Trying to preserve autocracy, 1855–1894: Government and Tsars: Alexander II and Alexander III as rulers; attitudes to and imposition of autocracy; key developments

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge