AQA · A-Level · History

    Course version: 7042 · Version from Sept 2017

    Britain, Germany, France, Russia and Austria-Hungary, c1890–1900: Empires…

    Full specification wording

    2K International Relations and Global Conflict, c1890–1941 (A-level only) – Great Powers: Britain, Germany, France, Russia and Austria-Hungary, c1890–1900: Empires and rivalries: the ‘Scramble for Africa’; Russo-Austro-Hungarian rivalry in the Balkans; Russia and the Ottoman Empire

    Late nineteenth-century imperialism fundamentally destabilised European relations.

    Checked against the AQA 7042 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 3 of 4

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    Late nineteenth-century imperialism fundamentally destabilised European relations. The 'Scramble for Africa' saw powers like Britain, France, and Germany aggressively partition the continent, exemplified by the 1898 Fashoda Incident which nearly sparked an Anglo-French war over Sudan. Simultaneously, the declining Ottoman Empire created a dangerous power vacuum in Eastern Europe. Russia sought to exploit this weakness to secure warm-water access through the Straits, directly threatening Ottoman survival. This expansionism clashed violently with Austro-Hungarian interests in the Balkans, as both empires vied for influence over newly independent Slavic states like Serbia, cementing a volatile Russo-Austro-Hungarian rivalry that would eventually ignite global conflict.

    What earns the marks

    • Explain the economic and strategic motivations driving the 'Scramble for Africa' and how it exacerbated tensions between European powers.
    • Analyse the geopolitical significance of the declining Ottoman Empire to Russian strategic aims, particularly regarding access to the Dardanelles.
    • Evaluate the causes of Russo-Austro-Hungarian rivalry in the Balkans, focusing on competing imperial ambitions and the influence of Pan-Slavism.
    • Assess how imperial disputes in peripheral regions such as Africa and the Balkans influenced the core diplomatic alignments of the Great Powers.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Assuming the Scramble for Africa only involved Britain and France.

      Put it right: Acknowledge the disruptive entry of Germany and Italy into the imperial competition.

    • Conflating Russian and Austro-Hungarian aims in the Balkans.

      Put it right: Distinguish between Russia's Pan-Slavic ideological goals and Austria-Hungary's defensive need to suppress multi-ethnic nationalism.

    • Treating the Ottoman Empire as entirely passive.

      Put it right: Recognise Ottoman diplomatic efforts to play European powers against each other to delay imperial collapse.

    Exam tips

    • Use specific crises, such as the Fashoda Incident, to illustrate how colonial rivalries in Africa translated into European diplomatic tensions.
    • Link Russian ambitions regarding the Ottoman Empire directly to their need for secure, year-round maritime trade routes through the Black Sea Straits.
    • When discussing the Balkans, explicitly connect the decline of Ottoman authority to the rise of the Russo-Austro-Hungarian power struggle.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the 2K International Relations and Global Conflict, c1890–1941 (A-level only) – Great Powers: Britain, Germany, France, Russia and Austria-Hungary, c1890–1900: Empires and rivalries: the ‘Scramble for Africa’; Russo-Austro-Hungarian rivalry in the Balkans; Russia and the Ottoman Empire lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which of the following best describes the primary geopolitical motivation driving the 'Scramble for Africa' among European Great Powers in the late nineteenth century?

    Listen

    Late nineteenth-century imperialism fundamentally destabilised European relations. The 'Scramble for Africa' saw powers like Britain, France, and Germany aggressively partition the continent, exemplified by the 1898 Fashoda Incident which nearly sparked an Anglo-French war over Sudan. Simultaneously, the declining Ottoman Empire created a dangerous power vacuum in Eastern Europe. Russia sought to exploit this weakness to secure warm-water access through the Straits, directly threatening Ottoman survival. This expansionism clashed violently with Austro-Hungarian interests in the Balkans, as both empires vied for influence over newly independent Slavic states like Serbia, cementing a volatile Russo-Austro-Hungarian rivalry that would eventually ignite global conflict. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explain the economic and strategic motivations driving the 'Scramble for Africa' and how it exacerbated tensions between European powers. Analyse the geopolitical significance of the declining Ottoman Empire to Russian strategic aims, particularly regarding access to the Dardanelles. Evaluate the causes of Russo-Austro-Hungarian rivalry in the Balkans, focusing on competing imperial ambitions and the influence of Pan-Slavism. Assess how imperial disputes in peripheral regions such as Africa and the Balkans influenced the core diplomatic alignments of the Great Powers. A common slip: Assuming the Scramble for Africa only involved Britain and France. Instead, acknowledge the disruptive entry of Germany and Italy into the imperial competition. Exam tip: Use specific crises, such as the Fashoda Incident, to illustrate how colonial rivalries in Africa translated into European diplomatic tensions.

    See it

    A flowchart running from top to bottom. The first box reads 'Declining Ottoman Empire' and points to 'Power vacuum in Eastern Europe'. From that box two branches emerge. One leads to 'Russia seeks warm-water access through the Straits', which points to 'Threat to Ottoman survival'. The other leads to 'Austro-Hungarian interests in the Balkans', which points to 'Rivalry over influence in the Balkans'. The Russia box also points to that same rivalry box. The rivalry box then points to 'Volatile Russo-Austro-Hungarian rivalry', which finally points to 'Contributes to global conflict'.
    It shows how the decline of the Ottoman Empire created a power vacuum that drew Russia and Austria-Hungary into rivalry in the Balkans.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A flowchart running from top to bottom. The first box reads 'Declining Ottoman Empire' and points to 'Power vacuum in Eastern Europe'. From that box two branches emerge. One leads to 'Russia seeks warm-water access through the Straits', which points to 'Threat to Ottoman survival'. The other leads to 'Austro-Hungarian interests in the Balkans', which points to 'Rivalry over influence in the Balkans'. The Russia box also points to that same rivalry box. The rivalry box then points to 'Volatile Russo-Austro-Hungarian rivalry', which finally points to 'Contributes to global conflict'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of 2K International Relations and Global Conflict, c1890–1941 (A-level only) – Great Powers: Britain, Germany, France, Russia and Austria-Hungary, c1890–1900: Empires and rivalries: the ‘Scramble for Africa’; Russo-Austro-Hungarian rivalry in the Balkans; Russia and the Ottoman Empire

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge