Pearson Edexcel · A-Level · History
Course version: 9HI0 · Version from Sept 2015
The British experience of warfare, c1790–1918 - 2 The Crimean War,…
Full specification wording
Paper 3, Option 35.2: The British experience of warfare, c1790–1918 - 2 The Crimean War, 1854–56: Changing attitudes of the public in Britain to the conduct of the war, including the impact of the photography of Roger Fenton and the reportage of William Russell.
This topic examines how public opinion in Britain shifted during the Crimean War, focusing on the roles of William Russell's reporting and Roger Fenton's photography.
Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 9HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .
- Point 3 of 3
- 4 key terms
Study notes
From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.
The idea
This topic examines how public opinion in Britain shifted during the Crimean War, focusing on the roles of William Russell's reporting and Roger Fenton's photography. Early war enthusiasm gave way to criticism as reports exposed logistical failures, poor medical care and command incompetence. Russell's dispatches for The Times described the harsh conditions of soldiers and the suffering at Scutari, shaping a narrative of mismanagement that contributed to the fall of Aberdeen's government in January 1855. Fenton's photographs, taken later under official patronage from March 1855, presented a more controlled view, often omitting dead bodies and emphasising order and heroism. Together, these media influenced public attitudes.
What earns the marks
- Explains how William Russell's reportage for The Times exposed deficiencies in supplies, medical care and leadership, thereby altering public perception from support to criticism.
- Analyses the impact of Roger Fenton's photographs in shaping a sanitised or heroic image of the war, and how this contrasted with written reports.
- Evaluates the extent to which public attitudes changed, considering factors such as censorship, the role of other media and the timing of information reaching Britain.
- Uses specific examples, such as Russell's description of the hospital at Scutari or Fenton's images of camp life, to support arguments about changing attitudes.
- Assesses the limitations of each source, including Fenton's official commission and the delay in publishing photographs, when judging their impact on the public.
Common mistakes and how to put them right
Treating Fenton's photographs as objective documentary evidence.
Put it right: Recognise that Fenton was officially commissioned and his images were selective, often avoiding scenes of death and suffering.
Assuming Russell's reports were immediately and universally accepted.
Put it right: Consider that public opinion was also shaped by other factors, and some initially doubted or ignored his accounts.
Claiming Fenton's photographs contributed to the fall of Aberdeen's government.
Put it right: Note that Aberdeen resigned in January 1855, before Fenton began taking his Crimean photographs in March 1855; it was Russell's reporting that influenced the government's collapse.
Exam tips
- When analysing sources, explicitly link their content to changes in public attitudes, using contemporary context such as the role of The Times.
- Compare and contrast the impact of photography and reportage, noting differences in immediacy, emotional appeal and official control.
Try the lesson
The start of the Paper 3, Option 35.2: The British experience of warfare, c1790–1918 - 2 The Crimean War, 1854–56: Changing attitudes of the public in Britain to the conduct of the war, including the impact of the photography of Roger Fenton and the reportage of William Russell. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.
Have a go first
Which form of reporting first brought detailed accounts of the Crimean War's conduct to the British public?
Listen
This topic examines how public opinion in Britain shifted during the Crimean War, focusing on the roles of William Russell's reporting and Roger Fenton's photography. Early war enthusiasm gave way to criticism as reports exposed logistical failures, poor medical care and command incompetence. Russell's dispatches for The Times described the harsh conditions of soldiers and the suffering at Scutari, shaping a narrative of mismanagement that contributed to the fall of Aberdeen's government in January 1855. Fenton's photographs, taken later under official patronage from March 1855, presented a more controlled view, often omitting dead bodies and emphasising order and heroism. Together, these media influenced public attitudes. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explains how William Russell's reportage for The Times exposed deficiencies in supplies, medical care and leadership, thereby altering public perception from support to criticism. Analyses the impact of Roger Fenton's photographs in shaping a sanitised or heroic image of the war, and how this contrasted with written reports. Evaluates the extent to which public attitudes changed, considering factors such as censorship, the role of other media and the timing of information reaching Britain. Uses specific examples, such as Russell's description of the hospital at Scutari or Fenton's images of camp life, to support arguments about changing attitudes. A common slip: Treating Fenton's photographs as objective documentary evidence. Instead, Recognise that Fenton was officially commissioned and his images were selective, often avoiding scenes of death and suffering. Exam tip: When analysing sources, explicitly link their content to changes in public attitudes, using contemporary context such as the role of The Times.
Key words
Say what each word means before you turn the card.
reportage
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
censorship
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
official patronage
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
public opinion
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
See every definition
- reportage
- Written reporting, such as William Russell's dispatches for The Times, which described the harsh conditions of soldiers and the suffering at Scutari.
- censorship
- Official control of information, a limitation to consider when assessing how each source shaped public opinion.
- official patronage
- The official commission under which Fenton's photographs were taken from March 1855, presenting a more controlled view of the war.
- public opinion
- Attitudes of the public in Britain to the conduct of the war, which shifted from early enthusiasm to criticism as reports exposed failures.
There is more to this lesson
The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Test your understanding of Paper 3, Option 35.2: The British experience of warfare, c1790–1918 - 2 The Crimean War, 1854–56: Changing attitudes of the public in Britain to the conduct of the war, including the impact of the photography of Roger Fenton and the reportage of William Russell.
Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge