Pearson Edexcel · GCSE · History

    Course version: 1HI0 · Version from Sept 2016

    The historic environment - 2 Knowledge, selection and use of sources for…

    Full specification wording

    Option 12: The historic environment - 2 Knowledge, selection and use of sources for historical enquiries: Recognition of the strengths and weaknesses of different types of source for specific enquiries.

    Evaluating historical evidence requires a nuanced recognition of the strengths and weaknesses inherent in different types of sources, always judged against a specific enquiry.

    Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 1HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 3 of 5
    • 2 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    Evaluating historical evidence requires a nuanced recognition of the strengths and weaknesses inherent in different types of sources, always judged against a specific enquiry. A source is never universally 'reliable' or 'unreliable'; its utility depends entirely on the question being asked. For example, a heavily censored newspaper has weaknesses for an enquiry into the factual details of a military defeat, as facts will be obscured. However, that same newspaper possesses significant strengths for an enquiry into government propaganda and morale-management techniques.

    What earns the marks

    • Assess the strengths of a source by linking its nature, origin, or purpose directly to the specific enquiry.
    • Identify the weaknesses of a source, such as bias, censorship, or limited perspective, in relation to the enquiry.
    • Explain how a source's weakness for one historical question might be a strength for another.
    • Synthesise the strengths and weaknesses to reach a balanced judgement on the source's overall utility.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Stating a source is 'biased and therefore useless'.

      Put it right: Explain how bias can actually be a strength if the enquiry is about attitudes or propaganda.

    • Evaluating the source in isolation.

      Put it right: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses in the context of the specific enquiry question provided.

    • Relying on generic statements like 'photographs cannot lie'.

      Put it right: Acknowledge that photographs can be staged, cropped, or selectively framed.

    Exam tips

    • Always use the wording of the specific enquiry in your answer to ensure your evaluation remains focused.
    • Look for the 'purpose' of the source in its provenance; this is often the key to unlocking both its strengths and weaknesses.
    • Avoid generic evaluations; ensure your points about strengths and weaknesses are specific to the content and context of the source provided.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Option 12: The historic environment - 2 Knowledge, selection and use of sources for historical enquiries: Recognition of the strengths and weaknesses of different types of source for specific enquiries. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    What is a common strength of using a personal diary as a historical source for a specific enquiry?

    Listen

    Evaluating historical evidence requires a nuanced recognition of the strengths and weaknesses inherent in different types of sources, always judged against a specific enquiry. A source is never universally 'reliable' or 'unreliable'; its utility depends entirely on the question being asked. For example, a heavily censored newspaper has weaknesses for an enquiry into the factual details of a military defeat, as facts will be obscured. However, that same newspaper possesses significant strengths for an enquiry into government propaganda and morale-management techniques. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Assess the strengths of a source by linking its nature, origin, or purpose directly to the specific enquiry. Identify the weaknesses of a source, such as bias, censorship, or limited perspective, in relation to the enquiry. Explain how a source's weakness for one historical question might be a strength for another. Synthesise the strengths and weaknesses to reach a balanced judgement on the source's overall utility. A common slip: Stating a source is 'biased and therefore useless'. Instead, explain how bias can actually be a strength if the enquiry is about attitudes or propaganda. Exam tip: Always use the wording of the specific enquiry in your answer to ensure your evaluation remains focused.

    See it

    A flowchart running from top to bottom. A box labelled 'Source' leads to a box labelled 'Specific enquiry'. From the enquiry, two branches lead to 'Strengths: nature, origin or purpose linked to the enquiry' and 'Weaknesses: bias, censorship or limited perspective in relation to the enquiry'. Both of these lead into a box labelled 'Weigh strengths against weaknesses', which leads to a final box labelled 'Balanced judgement on overall utility'. A separate box labelled 'Weakness for one question can be a strength for another' also feeds into the weighing step.
    It shows how a source's strengths and weaknesses are judged against a specific enquiry and then weighed to reach a balanced judgement on its utility.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Source utility

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Provenance

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Source utility
    The overall value of a source to the historian, determined by weighing its strengths and weaknesses against the specific enquiry.
    Provenance
    The nature, origin and purpose of a source, weighed against the specific focus of the investigation to determine its overall value.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A flowchart running from top to bottom. A box labelled 'Source' leads to a box labelled 'Specific enquiry'. From the enquiry, two branches lead to 'Strengths: nature, origin or purpose linked to the enquiry' and 'Weaknesses: bias, censorship or limited perspective in relation to the enquiry'. Both of these lead into a box labelled 'Weigh strengths against weaknesses', which leads to a final box labelled 'Balanced judgement on overall utility'. A separate box labelled 'Weakness for one question can be a strength for another' also feeds into the weighing step.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Option 12: The historic environment - 2 Knowledge, selection and use of sources for historical enquiries: Recognition of the strengths and weaknesses of different types of source for specific enquiries.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge