Pearson Edexcel · GCSE · History

    Course version: 1HI0 · Version from Sept 2016

    Key topic 2: The escalating conflict, 1964–73 - 1 The Six Day War, 1967:…

    Full specification wording

    Option P5: Key topic 2: The escalating conflict, 1964–73 - 1 The Six Day War, 1967: The actions of the USSR, Nasser and the USA in the period leading to war.

    In the build-up to the 1967 Six Day War, the USSR played a critical role by providing false intelligence to Egypt on 13 May, claiming Israel was massing troops on the Syrian border.

    Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 1HI0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 2 of 3
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    In the build-up to the 1967 Six Day War, the USSR played a critical role by providing false intelligence to Egypt on 13 May, claiming Israel was massing troops on the Syrian border. This prompted Nasser to take decisive actions to maintain his leadership of the Arab world. Nasser mobilised the Egyptian army into the Sinai Peninsula, expelled the UN Emergency Force (UNEF) peacekeepers, and closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping on 22 May, an act Israel considered a casus belli. Meanwhile, the USA attempted diplomatic resolutions but ultimately signalled to Israel that it would not intervene to stop a preemptive Israeli strike. These combined actions—Soviet misinformation, Nasser's brinkmanship, and tacit US approval—created an unavoidable path to the outbreak of war.

    What earns the marks

    • Identify the USSR's role in supplying false intelligence regarding Israeli troop movements to Egypt.
    • Explain Nasser's three key escalatory steps: moving troops into Sinai, expelling UNEF, and closing the Straits of Tiran.
    • Describe the USA's diplomatic stance and its eventual tacit green light for Israeli preemptive action.
    • Evaluate how the interaction between superpower politics and regional brinkmanship made war inevitable.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Believing the USSR wanted a full-scale war.

      Put it right: The USSR likely intended to deter Israel and boost its Arab allies, not spark a regional war.

    • Stating the USA actively fought alongside Israel in 1967.

      Put it right: The USA provided diplomatic support and arms, but no direct military intervention.

    • Thinking Nasser attacked Israel first.

      Put it right: Nasser's actions were provocative, but Israel launched the first preemptive military strike.

    Exam tips

    • Clearly sequence Nasser's actions in May 1967 to show the rapid escalation of the crisis.
    • Discuss the closure of the Straits of Tiran as the definitive trigger that made Israeli military action certain.
    • Contrast the roles of the USSR and the USA to demonstrate how Cold War dynamics influenced the Middle East conflict.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Option P5: Key topic 2: The escalating conflict, 1964–73 - 1 The Six Day War, 1967: The actions of the USSR, Nasser and the USA in the period leading to war. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which provocative action did Egyptian President Nasser take in May 1967 that Israel considered an act of war?

    Listen

    In the build-up to the 1967 Six Day War, the USSR played a critical role by providing false intelligence to Egypt on 13 May, claiming Israel was massing troops on the Syrian border. This prompted Nasser to take decisive actions to maintain his leadership of the Arab world. Nasser mobilised the Egyptian army into the Sinai Peninsula, expelled the UN Emergency Force (UNEF) peacekeepers, and closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping on 22 May, an act Israel considered a casus belli. Meanwhile, the USA attempted diplomatic resolutions but ultimately signalled to Israel that it would not intervene to stop a preemptive Israeli strike. These combined actions—Soviet misinformation, Nasser's brinkmanship, and tacit US approval—created an unavoidable path to the outbreak of war. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Identify the USSR's role in supplying false intelligence regarding Israeli troop movements to Egypt. Explain Nasser's three key escalatory steps: moving troops into Sinai, expelling UNEF, and closing the Straits of Tiran. Describe the USA's diplomatic stance and its eventual tacit green light for Israeli preemptive action. Evaluate how the interaction between superpower politics and regional brinkmanship made war inevitable. A common slip: Believing the USSR wanted a full-scale war. Instead, The USSR likely intended to deter Israel and boost its Arab allies, not spark a regional war. Exam tip: Clearly sequence Nasser's actions in May 1967 to show the rapid escalation of the crisis.

    See it

    A flowchart running from top to bottom. The USSR supplies false intelligence to Egypt on 13 May, which leads to Nasser mobilising the Egyptian army into Sinai. This leads to Nasser expelling the UNEF peacekeepers, which leads to Nasser closing the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping on 22 May. That leads to Israel regarding the closure as a casus belli. Separately, the USA attempts diplomatic resolutions, which leads to the USA signalling it will not intervene to stop a preemptive Israeli strike. Both the Israeli view of the closure as a casus belli and the US signal lead to the outbreak of war.
    It shows how Soviet false intelligence, Nasser's escalatory steps and the USA's tacit approval combined to lead to the outbreak of war.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Brinkmanship

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Preemptive warfare

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Casus belli

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    UNEF

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Brinkmanship
    Nasser's escalatory actions, including moving troops into Sinai, expelling UNEF and closing the Straits of Tiran, which pushed the crisis towards war.
    Preemptive warfare
    The first military strike launched by Israel, which the USA tacitly approved by signalling it would not intervene to stop it.
    Casus belli
    An act Israel considered justification for war, namely the closure of the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping on 22 May.
    UNEF
    The UN Emergency Force peacekeepers whom Nasser expelled as one of his three key escalatory steps.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A flowchart running from top to bottom. The USSR supplies false intelligence to Egypt on 13 May, which leads to Nasser mobilising the Egyptian army into Sinai. This leads to Nasser expelling the UNEF peacekeepers, which leads to Nasser closing the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping on 22 May. That leads to Israel regarding the closure as a casus belli. Separately, the USA attempts diplomatic resolutions, which leads to the USA signalling it will not intervene to stop a preemptive Israeli strike. Both the Israeli view of the closure as a casus belli and the US signal lead to the outbreak of war.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Option P5: Key topic 2: The escalating conflict, 1964–73 - 1 The Six Day War, 1967: The actions of the USSR, Nasser and the USA in the period leading to war.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge