AQA · A-Level · Psychology

    Course version: 7182-2025 · Exams from 2027

    Scientific processes: Pilot studies and the aims of piloting.

    A trial run is a small-scale version of the whole procedure, carried out on a few participants before the real investigation, and its point is to find problems while they are still cheap to fix.

    Checked against the AQA 7182-2025 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 4 of 17
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    A trial run is a small-scale version of the whole procedure, carried out on a few participants before the real investigation, and its point is to find problems while they are still cheap to fix. It checks that instructions are understood, that the task is neither so easy that everyone is at ceiling nor so hard that nobody scores, that the timings work, and that the manipulation of the IV actually produces a change. With a questionnaire it exposes ambiguous, leading or intrusive items; in an observation it tests whether the behavioural categories can be used consistently by two observers. It also saves money and is an ethical gain, because fewer people are put through a flawed design. The data collected are not reported as results and the hypothesis is not tested on them.

    What earns the marks

    • Defines it as a small-scale trial of the procedure on a few participants before the main study.
    • States a purpose: checking instructions, materials, timings or the effectiveness of the IV manipulation.
    • Explains that problems are identified and the design modified before resources are committed.
    • Applies it to a named method, for example refining questionnaire items or trialling behavioural categories for observer agreement.
    • Notes the economic and ethical benefit of not exposing a full sample to a flawed design.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Saying it is done 'to check the results are right', when it tests the procedure rather than the hypothesis.

    • Describing it as a small study whose data are combined with the main findings.

    • Giving only the vague purpose 'to see if it works' with no specific feature being trialled.

    • Forgetting to link it to the method in the scenario, so the answer stays generic.

    Exam tips

    • Always say what specifically would be trialled in that scenario and what change could follow from it, as marks come in pairs of problem and fix.
    • Mention the modification explicitly: 'the researcher could then reword the item' scores where 'to check the questionnaire' does not.
    • Use it as an improvement point in evaluation questions about a flawed study design.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Scientific processes: Pilot studies and the aims of piloting. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    What is the primary purpose of conducting a pilot study in psychological research?

    Listen

    A trial run is a small-scale version of the whole procedure, carried out on a few participants before the real investigation, and its point is to find problems while they are still cheap to fix. It checks that instructions are understood, that the task is neither so easy that everyone is at ceiling nor so hard that nobody scores, that the timings work, and that the manipulation of the IV actually produces a change. With a questionnaire it exposes ambiguous, leading or intrusive items; in an observation it tests whether the behavioural categories can be used consistently by two observers. It also saves money and is an ethical gain, because fewer people are put through a flawed design. The data collected are not reported as results and the hypothesis is not tested on them. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Defines it as a small-scale trial of the procedure on a few participants before the main study. States a purpose: checking instructions, materials, timings or the effectiveness of the IV manipulation. Explains that problems are identified and the design modified before resources are committed. Applies it to a named method, for example refining questionnaire items or trialling behavioural categories for observer agreement. Exam tip: Always say what specifically would be trialled in that scenario and what change could follow from it, as marks come in pairs of problem and fix.

    See it

    A flowchart running top to bottom. The top node reads 'Small-scale trial on a few participants' and branches into six checks: 'Checks instructions are understood', 'Checks task is not too easy or too hard', 'Checks timings work', 'Checks IV manipulation produces a change', 'Questionnaire: exposes ambiguous, leading or intrusive items', and 'Observation: tests behavioural categories used consistently by two observers'. All six checks lead to one node, 'Problems found and design modified before resources committed', which then leads to two final nodes: 'Saves money and is an ethical gain' and 'Data not reported as results and hypothesis not tested on them'.
    It shows what a pilot study checks before the main study, and the economic and ethical gains of modifying the design first.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Trialling a procedure

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Refining materials and instructions

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Economy of time and resources

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Ethical protection of participants

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Trialling a procedure
    A small-scale version of the whole procedure, carried out on a few participants before the real investigation, to find problems while they are still cheap to fix.
    Refining materials and instructions
    Checking that instructions are understood and that a questionnaire's ambiguous, leading or intrusive items are exposed, so the design can be modified before resources are committed.
    Economy of time and resources
    Finding a design fault before a full sample has been put through it, so that money is saved.
    Ethical protection of participants
    An ethical gain, because fewer people are put through a flawed design.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A flowchart running top to bottom. The top node reads 'Small-scale trial on a few participants' and branches into six checks: 'Checks instructions are understood', 'Checks task is not too easy or too hard', 'Checks timings work', 'Checks IV manipulation produces a change', 'Questionnaire: exposes ambiguous, leading or intrusive items', and 'Observation: tests behavioural categories used consistently by two observers'. All six checks lead to one node, 'Problems found and design modified before resources committed', which then leads to two final nodes: 'Saves money and is an ethical gain' and 'Data not reported as results and hypothesis not tested on them'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Scientific processes: Pilot studies and the aims of piloting.

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge