Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    Section A (20%) Post 1914 Prose/Drama — Eduqas GCSE English Literature

    Test yourself on Section A (20%) Post 1914 Prose/Drama with EDUQAS GCSE practice questions.

    Start free

    7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge

    Section A (20%) Post 1914 Prose/Drama explained

    Component 2 is a 2 hour and 30 minute examination worth 60% of the total qualification.

    Read the full explanation

    It consists of three sections: Section A (Post-1914 Prose/Drama), Section B (19th-Century Prose), and Section C (Unseen Poetry). The component assesses knowledge and understanding of plot, characterisation, themes, and the evaluation of how writers use language, structure, and form to create meaning. Section B requires an understanding of context, while Section C requires a comparison of two unseen poems.

    Read the Section A (20%) Post 1914 Prose/Drama study guideFull revision notes for Eduqas GCSE English Literature

    What to demonstrate

    1. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of plot, characterisation, events, and key themes
    2. Evaluate and analyse how language, structure, and form are used to create meanings and effects
    3. Show understanding of the varied contexts of the 19th-century prose text
    Show all 7 objectives
    1. Maintain a critical style and develop an informed personal response
    2. Use textual references and quotations to support interpretations
    3. Demonstrate accurate spelling, punctuation, and grammar (AO4 in Section A)
    4. Compare two unseen poems in Section C

    Section A (20%) Post 1914 Prose/Drama exam tips

    Topic Overview

    Section A (20%) of the WJEC GCSE English Literature exam focuses on Post-1914 Prose/Drama. This component requires you to study one text from a prescribed list, which includes modern novels and plays such as 'An Inspector Calls', 'Lord of the Flies', 'Blood Brothers', and 'The Woman in Black'. You will answer one question on your chosen text, which will be split into two parts: part (a) typically asks you to analyse an extract from the text, and part (b) asks you to discuss the wider text, linking your ideas to themes, characters, or the writer's methods. This section tests your ability to read critically, understand context, and construct a coherent argument.

    Mastering this section is crucial because it contributes 20% to your overall GCSE English Literature grade. It also develops key skills in textual analysis, which are transferable to other exam components and subjects. The focus on post-1914 literature allows you to explore modern themes such as social responsibility, conflict, and identity, which remain relevant today. By engaging deeply with your chosen text, you will learn to appreciate how writers use language, structure, and form to convey meaning and influence readers.

    This topic fits into the wider subject by complementing your study of poetry and pre-1914 texts. While Section B covers poetry and Section C covers unseen poetry, Section A gives you the opportunity to demonstrate sustained analysis of a single work. Success here requires you to know your text inside out, understand its historical and social context, and be able to write fluently about how the writer achieves effects. Regular revision, practice with past papers, and discussion of key themes will build your confidence and exam technique.

    Key Concepts
    • →Context: Understanding the social, historical, and cultural background of the text (e.g., post-war Britain for 'An Inspector Calls' or the Cold War era for 'Lord of the Flies') and how it influences themes and characters.
    • →Writer's methods: Analysing how the writer uses language (e.g., imagery, dialogue), structure (e.g., chronology, dramatic irony), and form (e.g., play vs. novel) to create meaning and effect.
    • →Characterisation: Exploring how characters are developed, their relationships, and their role in conveying the text's themes (e.g., Inspector Goole as a moral catalyst).
    • →Themes: Identifying and discussing central ideas such as responsibility, power, class, guilt, or survival, and how they are presented throughout the text.
    • →Extract analysis: The ability to zoom in on a short passage, identify key features, and link them to the wider text, using quotations effectively.
    Marking Points
    • Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of plot, characterisation, events, and key themes
    • Evaluate and analyse how language, structure, and form are used to create meanings and effects
    • Show understanding of the varied contexts of the 19th-century prose text
    • Maintain a critical style and develop an informed personal response
    • Use textual references and quotations to support interpretations
    • Demonstrate accurate spelling, punctuation, and grammar (AO4 in Section A)
    • Compare two unseen poems in Section C
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Ensure you have a clear, coherent argument that directly addresses the question
    • 💡Use subject-specific terminology when analysing language and structure
    • 💡Manage your time effectively across the three sections
    • 💡In Section B, explicitly link the text to its historical, social, or cultural context
    • 💡In Section C, focus on the similarities and differences in themes and techniques between the two unseen poems
    • 💡Tip 1: Plan your answer before writing. Spend 5 minutes jotting down key points for both parts (a) and (b). Ensure you address the extract in part (a) and then move to the wider text in part (b). A clear structure with topic sentences will help you stay focused.
    • 💡Tip 2: Use the P.E.E.L. method (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link) for each paragraph. Make a clear point, support it with a quotation, explain the effect of the writer's methods, and link back to the question or wider themes. This ensures depth and relevance.
    • 💡Tip 3: Show awareness of the text as a constructed piece. Use terms like 'the writer presents', 'the audience feels', 'this suggests'. Avoid simply saying 'the character is angry'; instead, say 'Priestley presents Birling as arrogant through his dismissive tone, which makes the audience question his authority.'
    Common Mistakes
    • Failing to use specific textual references or quotations to support points
    • Neglecting to analyse the writer's use of language, structure, and form
    • Ignoring the contextual factors relevant to the 19th-century prose text
    • Losing focus on the question by simply retelling the plot
    • Failing to compare the two unseen poems in Section C
    • Misconception: 'I just need to retell the story.' Correction: The exam rewards analysis, not summary. Focus on how and why events happen, not just what happens. Always link your points to the writer's intentions and effects on the audience.
    • Misconception: 'Context is just a fact I must mention.' Correction: Context should be integrated into your argument to explain why the writer made certain choices. For example, in 'Blood Brothers', Russell's portrayal of class division reflects 1980s Thatcherite Britain. Don't just state the fact; explain its relevance.
    • Misconception: 'Quotations can be long and from memory.' Correction: Use short, precise quotations that support your point. It's better to embed a key phrase than to write a long quote. Accuracy matters, so learn key quotes but also paraphrase where appropriate.
    Frequently Asked Questions
    How do I choose which text to study for Section A?
    Your school will likely assign a text, but if you have a choice, pick one that you find engaging and that has clear themes and characters. Popular choices include 'An Inspector Calls' for its strong social message and dramatic structure, or 'Lord of the Flies' for its vivid symbolism. Read the first few pages to see if the style appeals to you. Also, consider the availability of revision resources and past papers for that text.
    What should I include in my answer for the extract question (part a)?
    For part (a), you need to analyse the given extract in detail. Start by identifying the key events, characters, and language features. Use short quotations to support your points. Discuss how the writer creates mood, tension, or character, and link your observations to the wider text. For example, if the extract shows a confrontation, explain how it reflects the play's central conflict. Aim for 2-3 well-developed paragraphs.
    How can I improve my analysis of writer's methods?
    To improve, focus on specific techniques like imagery, dialogue, and structure. Ask yourself: why did the writer choose this word or this stage direction? What effect does it have on the reader or audience? For instance, in 'Blood Brothers', the use of the narrator creates a sense of inevitability. Practice by annotating short passages and discussing your ideas with classmates. Also, learn a bank of analytical verbs (e.g., 'suggests', 'emphasises', 'contrasts') to vary your language.
    How much context do I need to include?
    Context should be relevant and integrated, not just tacked on. For example, when discussing the theme of social class in 'An Inspector Calls', you might mention that Priestley was a socialist writing in 1945, just after the war, when there was a push for social reform. Explain how this context influences the play's message. Avoid lengthy historical digressions; one or two well-chosen contextual points per paragraph are enough.
    What if I forget a quote in the exam?
    Don't panic. You can paraphrase key moments or refer to events without exact quotes. For example, 'When the Inspector reveals that Eva Smith worked at Birling's factory, it shows Birling's lack of responsibility.' However, try to learn 10-15 key quotes for each character and theme. Use memory techniques like flashcards or mind maps. In the exam, if you can't remember the exact words, describe the scene and its significance.
    How should I structure my whole answer for Section A?
    Your answer should have two distinct parts. For part (a), write 2-3 paragraphs focusing on the extract. Start with a brief overview of what happens in the extract, then analyse language, structure, and context. For part (b), write 3-4 paragraphs discussing the wider text. Use a clear topic sentence for each paragraph, and ensure you answer the question directly. End with a short conclusion that summarises your main argument. Remember to spend roughly equal time on both parts.