Paper 3, Option 31: Rebellion and disorder under the Tudors, 1485–1603 - 2 Challenging religious changes, 1533–37 — Edexcel A-Level History
Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.
Paper 3, Option 31: Rebellion and disorder under the Tudors, 1485–1603 - 2 Challenging religious changes, 1533–37 explained
Paper 3, Option 31: Rebellion and disorder under the Tudors, 1485–1603 - 2 Challenging religious changes, 1533–37 covers 3 specification points, including The break with Rome and the dissolution of the… and Aims, methods, nature of support and extent of….
Read the full explanation
Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.
The impact of Henrician religious changes, 1533–37: the break with Rome and the dissolution of the monasteries.
Between 1533 and 1537 Henry VIII's religious changes reshaped England. The break with Rome began when the Act in Restraint of Appeals (1533) denied papal jurisdiction, followed by the Act of Supremacy (1534) making Henry supreme head of the Church, and the Treason Act (1534) criminalising denial of that title. Thomas Cromwell, as vicegerent, drove reform: the Valor Ecclesiasticus (1535) surveyed church wealth, and the Act for the Dissolution of the Smaller Monasteries (1536) closed houses worth under £200 a year, transferring lands to the Crown. The Pilgrimage of Grace (1536) and the Act for the Dissolution of the Larger Monasteries (1539) followed. Impact included royal control of the Church, huge land transfer, loss of monastic charity and education, and deep resentment in the north.
The causes and impact of the Lincolnshire Rising and the Pilgrimage of Grace: aims, methods, nature of support and extent of threat.
The Lincolnshire Rising (October 1536) and the Pilgrimage of Grace (October 1536 to early 1537) were northern protests against religious and governmental change. Causes included the dissolution of the smaller monasteries, fears for parish religion and the 1534 subsidies, plus resentment of Cromwell and southern advisers. Aims ranged from defending the Church and restoring the monasteries to removing Cromwell and expressing regional grievance. Methods included mass gatherings, oath-taking, banners such as the Five Wounds, petitions and negotiated truces rather than full-scale battle. Support came from clergy, gentry, commons and some nobility, giving the movement breadth but also divided leadership. The threat was serious: up to 30,000 rebels, a royal army stretched, and concessions extracted at Doncaster, though the 1537 Bigod rising and executions ended it.
The role of leaders in challenge and suppression: Robert Aske and Francis Bigod; Thomas Cromwell, Henry VIII and the Duke of Norfolk; the extent of repression in 1537.
Leadership shaped both the Pilgrimage of Grace and its defeat. Robert Aske, a Yorkshire lawyer, gave the rising discipline and a coherent programme defending the monasteries and the old faith, negotiating at Doncaster and trusting royal promises. Francis Bigod, a reformist gentleman, broke that unity in early 1537 by rebelling against the pardons, giving Henry VIII grounds to treat all rebels as traitors. Suppression was directed by Thomas Cromwell as vicegerent, with Henry VIII authorising harsh exemplary punishment and the Duke of Norfolk commanding forces in the north and presiding over trials. In 1537 martial law and executions, including Aske's, plus the Council of the North's strengthened role, produced extensive repression.
Your focus
- Describe the key statutes and events of the break with Rome between 1533 and 1537.
- Explain how the dissolution of the monasteries was carried out and what it transferred to the Crown.
- Evaluate the religious, political, economic and social impact of Henrician religious changes in this period.
Show all 9 objectives
- Explain the causes and aims of the Lincolnshire Rising and the Pilgrimage of Grace.
- Describe the methods used and the nature of support for the rebellions.
- Assess the extent to which the rebellions threatened Henry VIII's government.
- Explain how Robert Aske's leadership shaped the Pilgrimage of Grace and how Francis Bigod's rising changed its course.
- Explain the roles of Thomas Cromwell, Henry VIII and the Duke of Norfolk in challenging and suppressing rebellion.
- Assess the extent of repression in 1537 and its consequences for northern England.
Paper 3, Option 31: Rebellion and disorder under the Tudors, 1485–1603 - 2 Challenging religious changes, 1533–37 flashcards
Card 1 of 10
Robert Aske
Paper 3, Option 31: Rebellion and disorder under the Tudors, 1485–1603 - 2 Challenging religious changes, 1533–37 exam tips
Marking Points
- Explains the legal steps of the break with Rome: the Act in Restraint of Appeals (1533), the Act of Supremacy (1534) and the Treason Act (1534), showing how each removed papal authority and asserted royal supremacy.
- Analyses the dissolution of the monasteries as a two-stage process: the 1535 Valor Ecclesiasticus survey, the 1536 Act closing smaller houses worth under £200 a year, and the later closure of larger houses.
- Assesses the religious, political, economic and social impact: royal supremacy over doctrine, Crown acquisition of monastic lands and wealth, loss of charity, education and hospitality, and increased northern grievance.
- Evaluates the extent of change by comparing the break with Rome as a jurisdictional revolution with the dissolution as a material and institutional transformation, and by considering continuity in parish religion.
- Uses specific evidence, such as Cromwell's role as vicegerent, the Court of Augmentations handling monastic revenue, and the connection between dissolution and the 1536 rebellions.
- Identifies and explains causes: religious change including the dissolution of the smaller monasteries, economic grievances such as the 1534 subsidy and enclosures, and political resentment of Cromwell and low-born advisers.
- Analyses aims by distinguishing religious restoration, defence of the monasteries and parish religion, removal of Cromwell, and redress of regional and economic grievances.
- Examines methods: mass assembly, oath-taking, banners and pilgrim badges, petitions such as the Lincoln articles and Pontefract articles, negotiation at Doncaster, and limited violence.
- Assesses the nature of support: involvement of clergy, gentry such as Robert Aske, commons and some nobles, and the tensions this created between moderate and radical wings.
- Evaluates the extent of threat by weighing rebel numbers, speed of spread, royal financial and military strain, concessions granted, and the eventual collapse after the 1537 Bigod rising and executions.
- Explains how Aske's leadership gave the Pilgrimage of Grace coherence: he organised the pilgrims, articulated grievances about the dissolution of the monasteries and the Statute of Uses, and negotiated with Norfolk at Doncaster rather than seeking outright war.
- Explains how Bigod's rebellion in January 1537 undermined the settlement: his rising in the East Riding against the royal pardons allowed the Crown to present all participants as having broken their oaths, justifying renewed military action.
- Explains Cromwell's role as chief minister and vicegerent in orchestrating the dissolution of the smaller monasteries, gathering intelligence and directing the legal and administrative response to rebellion.
- Explains Henry VIII's personal role: he rejected the pilgrims' demands, used promises and pardons tactically, and authorised severe exemplary punishment to deter future disorder.
- Explains Norfolk's role as commander in the north: he negotiated at Doncaster, then returned in 1537 to disarm the rebels, arrest leaders and oversee trials and executions.
- Assesses the extent of repression in 1537: executions of Aske, Darcy, Bigod and others, martial law in the north, and the enhanced authority of the Council of the North, while noting that repression was selective rather than a blanket massacre.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Anchor each impact claim to a named statute, date or institution so the argument is precise rather than general.
- 💡Plan essays around categories of impact (religious, political, economic, social) and reach a judgement on which was most significant.
- 💡When using the dissolution, link it explicitly to the rebellions of 1536 to show causation and consequence.
- 💡Integrate short quotations or figures, such as the £200 threshold, to support analysis without narrating the whole process.
- 💡Structure answers around the four required strands: causes, aims, methods and support, then judge the extent of threat.
- 💡Use named leaders, dates and documents, such as Aske, the Pontefract articles and the Doncaster negotiations, to support precise analysis.
- 💡Weigh both sides of the threat judgement, setting rebel strength against royal resources and the rebellion's collapse.
- 💡Avoid narrative drift by linking each piece of evidence back to the question's focus on cause, impact or threat.
- 💡Plan answers around the command word: for 'how far' or 'to what extent' questions, weigh Aske's unifying leadership against Bigod's divisive rising and reach a supported judgement.
- 💡Use named individuals precisely: link Aske to negotiation, Bigod to renewed rebellion, Cromwell to policy and administration, Henry VIII to royal authority, and Norfolk to military suppression.
- 💡Integrate the extent of repression into your argument rather than bolting it on at the end; use it as evidence when judging how effectively the Crown restored control.
Common Mistakes
- Treating the break with Rome as a single event in 1534 rather than a sequence of statutes from 1533 onwards; correct this by dating each Act and explaining its distinct legal effect.
- Confusing the dissolution of the smaller monasteries (1536) with the dissolution of all monasteries; correct this by distinguishing the 1536 Act from the later closure of larger houses.
- Assuming the dissolution was purely religious; correct this by weighing economic motives, such as Crown revenue and land transfer, alongside religious reform.
- Describing the monasteries as uniformly corrupt without evidence; correct this by using the Valor Ecclesiasticus and visitation reports critically as partial sources.
- Treating the Lincolnshire Rising and the Pilgrimage of Grace as one identical event; correct this by distinguishing their chronology, leadership and demands.
- Assuming all rebels shared one aim; correct this by separating religious, economic and political grievances and noting divisions between gentry and commons.
- Claiming the rebellion nearly overthrew Henry VIII without qualification; correct this by assessing the threat alongside the Crown's eventual success in suppressing it.
- Ignoring the role of women and ordinary people; correct this by including evidence of broad popular participation where sources support it.
- Treating the Pilgrimage of Grace as a single spontaneous riot: correct this by showing Aske imposed discipline, a common oath and a negotiated strategy, which is why leadership is central to the enquiry.
- Assuming Bigod was a Catholic loyalist like Aske: correct this by noting Bigod was a reformist who objected to the pardons and the settlement, so his rising split the rebel cause rather than continuing it.
- Describing 1537 as indiscriminate slaughter of all northerners: correct this by explaining that punishment was exemplary and targeted at leaders and renewed rebels, though it was still severe and intimidating.