The First World War and its impact on British India, 1914–20 — Edexcel A-Level History
Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.
The First World War and its impact on British India, 1914–20 explained
The First World War and its impact on British India, 1914–20 covers 4 specification points, including Political geography; the British Raj; Indian… and Response to the outbreak of war; Indian….
Read the full explanation
Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.
India in 1914: political geography; the British Raj; Indian society and religion; importance of India to Britain; British and Indian attitudes towards each other; Indian nationalism.
In 1914 India was not a single political unit but a patchwork of directly ruled provinces and over 500 princely states, all under the British Raj. The Raj rested on the Viceroy, the Indian Civil Service and the Indian Army, with ultimate authority in London. Indian society was deeply stratified by caste, class, religion and region; Hindus formed a majority, Muslims a large minority, with Sikhs, Christians and others. Britain valued India as the 'jewel in the crown': a market for British goods, a source of raw materials and revenue, and the manpower for the Indian Army. British attitudes often combined racial superiority with a sense of duty, while Indian attitudes ranged from loyalism to growing nationalist demands. The Indian National Congress, founded in 1885, and the Muslim League, founded in 1906, pressed for greater representation and self-government.
India and the First World War: response to the outbreak of war; Indian military and economic contribution; economic impact in India and consequences for British rule.
When Britain declared war in August 1914, India was automatically at war. The response to the outbreak of war was largely loyal: the Viceroy, princes, and political leaders offered support, hoping for greater self-government as a reward. India's military and economic contribution was vast, providing over 1 million soldiers and labourers, alongside food, raw materials, and loans. The economic impact in India included industrial expansion, but also severe inflation, food shortages, and increased taxation, causing widespread hardship. These pressures had profound consequences for British rule. The war accelerated nationalist demands, prompting the 1917 Montagu Declaration and the 1919 Government of India Act. However, disappointment with these limited reforms and the repressive 1919 Rowlatt Act culminated in the Amritsar Massacre.
Effects of war on British rule: the impact on the Raj; the Montagu Declaration; the Rowlatt Acts. The Amritsar massacre and political aftermath; the Montagu-Chelmsford Report and the Government of India Act; significance of 1919 for British rule.
The First World War strained British rule in India. The Raj relied on Indian troops and resources, but wartime inflation, taxation and the 1918 influenza pandemic caused hardship, while promises of reform raised expectations. In 1917 the Montagu Declaration promised responsible government. The 1919 Rowlatt Acts allowed detention without trial, provoking protests. At Amritsar in April 1919, General Dyer ordered troops to fire on an unarmed crowd, killing hundreds. The massacre and subsequent lenient treatment of Dyer caused outrage. The Montagu-Chelmsford Report and the 1919 Government of India Act introduced dyarchy in the provinces, but retained British control at the centre. 1919 was significant because it combined reform with repression, undermining trust and strengthening nationalism.
The growth of nationalism: impact of war; the Indian National Congress and emergence of Gandhi; the Lucknow Pact and role of Jinnah; Home Rule Leagues; response to British legislation and the significance of Amritsar, 1919-20.
The First World War stimulated Indian nationalism. Wartime hardship, inflation and the 1918 influenza pandemic caused discontent, while promises of reform raised expectations. The Indian National Congress, founded in 1885, became the main platform for nationalist demands. Gandhi emerged as a leader after his return from South Africa in 1915, using satyagraha and non-cooperation. In 1916 the Lucknow Pact allied Congress and the Muslim League, and Jinnah played a key role in negotiating it. Home Rule Leagues, led by Tilak and Annie Besant, campaigned for self-government. The Rowlatt Acts and the Amritsar massacre in 1919 provoked outrage, and the 1919 Government of India Act offered limited reform. By 1920, nationalism had grown and Gandhi launched non-cooperation.
Your focus
- Students can identify the main political divisions of India in 1914, including British India and princely states.
- Students can explain the structure and function of the British Raj.
- Students can assess the importance of India to Britain in economic, military and strategic terms.
Show all 14 objectives
- Students can compare British and Indian attitudes towards each other and the empire.
- Students can outline the development of Indian nationalism up to 1914.
- Describe the Indian response to the outbreak of the First World War and the scale of the military and economic contribution.
- Assess the economic impact of the war within India, including both industrial growth and civilian hardship.
- Analyse the consequences for British rule, including the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms and the subsequent backlash.
- Explain how the First World War affected the Raj and why it led to both reform and repression.
- Describe the Montagu Declaration, the Rowlatt Acts, the Amritsar massacre, and the Montagu-Chelmsford Report and Government of India Act.
- Assess the significance of 1919 for British rule in India, using evidence of both reform and repression.
- Explain how the First World War contributed to the growth of Indian nationalism.
- Describe the roles of the Indian National Congress, Gandhi, the Lucknow Pact, Jinnah, and the Home Rule Leagues.
- Assess the significance of British legislation and the Amritsar massacre for Indian nationalism in 1919–20.
The First World War and its impact on British India, 1914–20 flashcards
Card 1 of 7
Political geography of India in 1914
The First World War and its impact on British India, 1914–20 exam tips
Marking Points
- Political geography: identify directly administered British India (e.g. Bengal, Bombay, Madras) and princely states (e.g. Hyderabad, Mysore) which accepted British paramountcy but retained internal autonomy.
- The British Raj: explain the roles of the Viceroy, the India Office in London, the Indian Civil Service and the Indian Army in maintaining control.
- Indian society and religion: describe the diversity of religions (Hinduism, Islam, Sikhism, Christianity), the caste system, and regional and linguistic divisions.
- Importance of India to Britain: assess India as a market for British exports, a source of raw materials such as cotton and tea, a field for investment, and a supplier of soldiers and revenue.
- British and Indian attitudes: contrast British beliefs in racial hierarchy and paternalism with Indian loyalism, reformism and emerging nationalism.
- Indian nationalism: outline the aims and methods of the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League by 1914, including demands for greater Indian representation in government.
- Explains the response to the outbreak of war, including the loyal support from the Viceroy, princely states, and political leaders, and the expectation of political reward.
- Details the Indian military and economic contribution, including over 1 million personnel and the supply of food, munitions, and financial loans.
- Assesses the economic impact in India, balancing the growth of domestic industry with the hardships of inflation, food shortages, and increased taxation.
- Analyses the consequences for British rule, explaining how wartime pressures accelerated nationalist demands and prompted the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms.
- Evaluates how disappointment with limited reforms and the imposition of the Rowlatt Act led to the Amritsar Massacre and growing opposition.
- Explains how the First World War affected the Raj: increased demands on Indian manpower and finance, inflation, and the 1918 influenza pandemic, which caused hardship and unrest.
- Describes the Montagu Declaration of 1917 as a promise of responsible government, and explains how it raised Indian political expectations.
- Explains the Rowlatt Acts of 1919 as emergency powers allowing detention without trial, and how they provoked widespread protests.
- Narrates the Amritsar massacre: General Dyer ordered troops to fire on an unarmed crowd in April 1919, killing hundreds and wounding many more.
- Analyses the political aftermath of Amritsar: official inquiries, Dyer's treatment, and the resulting Indian outrage and British division.
- Explains the Montagu-Chelmsford Report and the 1919 Government of India Act: dyarchy in the provinces, limited franchise, and continued British control at the centre.
- Assesses the significance of 1919 for British rule: reform and repression together eroded trust and strengthened Indian nationalism.
- Explains how the First World War increased Indian nationalism through hardship, inflation, the 1918 influenza pandemic, and expectations raised by wartime promises.
- Describes the Indian National Congress as the main nationalist organisation and explains how its demands grew during the war.
- Explains Gandhi's emergence as a leader after 1915, including his use of satyagraha and non-cooperation.
- Explains the Lucknow Pact of 1916 as an agreement between Congress and the Muslim League, and assesses Jinnah's role in negotiating it.
- Describes the Home Rule Leagues led by Tilak and Annie Besant, and explains their campaign for self-government.
- Analyses Indian responses to British legislation, especially the Rowlatt Acts and the 1919 Government of India Act.
- Assesses the significance of Amritsar in 1919–20 for the growth of nationalism, including outrage and the shift towards non-cooperation.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Use specific examples of princely states and provinces to demonstrate precise geographical knowledge.
- 💡When discussing attitudes, refer to named individuals or groups (e.g. Viceroy, Congress leaders) to support your points.
- 💡Link the importance of India to Britain to the wider context of British imperial strategy and economic interests.
- 💡Use precise figures for the Indian military contribution (e.g., over 1 million soldiers and non-combatants) to demonstrate detailed knowledge.
- 💡Ensure chronological accuracy: the Montagu Declaration (1917) preceded the Rowlatt Act and Amritsar Massacre (1919).
- 💡Build a clear chronological framework for 1917–1919: Montagu Declaration, Rowlatt Acts, Amritsar, Montagu-Chelmsford Report, Government of India Act.
- 💡For causation questions, link wartime pressures to the Montagu Declaration and to the Rowlatt Acts, and link Amritsar to the political aftermath.
- 💡Use precise terms such as dyarchy, responsible government, and detention without trial, and explain what they meant in practice.
- 💡When assessing significance, weigh reform against repression and show how the combination affected Indian trust in British rule.
- 💡Link each nationalist development to the impact of war: wartime hardship, raised expectations, and the 1919 reforms and repression.
- 💡For questions on Gandhi, explain what satyagraha and non-cooperation meant in practice, not just that he led protests.
- 💡When discussing the Lucknow Pact, explain what each side gained and why Jinnah's role mattered.
- 💡For significance questions on Amritsar, consider both immediate reactions and longer-term effects on Congress, Gandhi, and British authority.
Common Mistakes
- Error: treating India as a single uniform colony. Correction: recognise the distinction between British India and the princely states, and the diversity of languages, religions and social structures.
- Error: assuming all Indians were nationalist or all British were oppressive. Correction: present a range of attitudes, including loyalism, moderate reformism and varying degrees of British paternalism and racism.
- Error: confusing the Indian National Congress with the Muslim League. Correction: note their different founding dates, membership bases and initial objectives, while acknowledging overlap in demands for representation.
- Error: stating the Rowlatt Act and Amritsar Massacre led to the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms. Correction: the reforms were formulated during the war (1917-18) before the 1919 Rowlatt Act and Amritsar Massacre occurred.
- Error: overstating the economic benefits of the war for India without acknowledging the hardships. Correction: balance the growth of industry with the inflation and food shortages suffered by many.
- Error: assuming that Indian contributions automatically led to independence. Correction: explain that reforms were limited and nationalist pressure increased, but full independence came much later.
- Confusing the Montagu Declaration (1917) with the Montagu-Chelmsford Report (1918). Correction: the Declaration was a short statement of intent; the Report was a detailed scheme that led to the 1919 Act.
- Stating that the Rowlatt Acts were passed after the Amritsar massacre. Correction: the Acts were passed in March 1919, before the massacre in April 1919.
- Claiming that the 1919 Government of India Act granted full independence or full democracy. Correction: it introduced dyarchy in the provinces but kept the central government under British control and retained a limited franchise.
- Describing the Amritsar massacre as a riot or a battle. Correction: it was the shooting of an unarmed crowd by troops under General Dyer's orders.
- Treating the Indian National Congress as a single, unified body with one view. Correction: it contained different groups and opinions, and its demands changed over time.
- Confusing the Lucknow Pact (1916) with the Montagu-Chelmsford Report (1918). Correction: the Lucknow Pact was an agreement between Congress and the Muslim League; the Montagu-Chelmsford Report was a British constitutional scheme.
- Stating that Gandhi led the Home Rule Leagues. Correction: the Home Rule Leagues were led by Tilak and Annie Besant; Gandhi's rise to national leadership came through other campaigns.
- Claiming that the Amritsar massacre immediately caused independence. Correction: it caused outrage and strengthened nationalism, but British rule continued for decades.