This subtopic focuses on the specialist skills required to plan, deliver, and evaluate individualised learning programmes for learners with dyslexia and ot
Topic Synopsis
This subtopic focuses on the specialist skills required to plan, deliver, and evaluate individualised learning programmes for learners with dyslexia and other specific learning differences, emphasising evidence-based, multisensory teaching approaches and the integration of assistive technologies. Practitioners must be able to interpret detailed assessment data to design targeted interventions that address literacy barriers and promote independent learning across different educational stages and settings.
Key Concepts & Core Principles
- Diagnostic Assessment: The process of using standardised tests (e.g., WRAT-5, TOWRE-2) and informal observations to identify specific learning differences, determine eligibility for access arrangements, and inform teaching plans. You must understand how to interpret scores, including percentiles and standard deviations, and write a comprehensive assessment report.
- Neurodiversity: The concept that neurological variations like dyslexia, dyspraxia, and ADHD are natural differences in human cognition, not deficits. This perspective underpins strengths-based teaching approaches and challenges deficit models. You need to apply this to create inclusive learning environments.
- Phonological Awareness and Multisensory Teaching: Core to literacy intervention, phonological awareness is the ability to recognise and manipulate sounds in words. Multisensory teaching (e.g., using visual, auditory, and kinaesthetic-tactile pathways) is evidence-based for dyslexic learners, as it strengthens neural connections through simultaneous engagement of multiple senses.
- Barriers to Literacy: These include not only decoding and spelling difficulties but also issues with working memory, processing speed, and executive function. Understanding how these barriers manifest (e.g., slow reading, poor handwriting, difficulty organising ideas) is essential for targeted support.
- Access Arrangements: Reasonable adjustments for exams, such as extra time, a reader, or a scribe, based on a diagnostic assessment. You must know the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) regulations and how to justify arrangements through evidence of need.
Exam Tips & Revision Strategies
- For assessment tasks, always reference how you used initial and ongoing assessment data to tailor the programme, and provide concrete examples of adapted resources.
- When writing reflective accounts, critically evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies with others, and suggest improvements based on feedback.
- In teaching observations, clearly signpost the multisensory structure of your session and explain how each element addresses a specific barrier to literacy.
- Document moments where you explicitly taught learners how to use assistive technology independently, and evaluate the impact on their self-reliance and progress.
Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid
- Failing to link lesson objectives directly to the individual's specific assessment profile, leading to generic rather than targeted interventions.
- Overlooking the importance of multisensory principles; relying too heavily on verbal instruction without incorporating visual, auditory, and kinaesthetic-tactile elements.
- Not adequately communicating the rationale and content of the programme to all stakeholders, which can result in inconsistent support across environments.
- Assuming learners will automatically transfer taught strategies to independent contexts without explicit modeling and guided practice of self-regulation techniques.
- Selecting assistive technology based on availability rather than matching the tool to the learner's specific needs and the demands of the curriculum.
Examiner Marking Points
- Award credit for demonstrating systematic lesson planning that explicitly references cognitive and literacy assessment data to set individualised, measurable goals.
- Look for evidence of effective communication with parents, teachers, and other professionals about the planned programme, including clear rationales for chosen strategies and expected outcomes.
- Assess the ability to implement multi-sensory, structured teaching techniques that are explicitly linked to the learner's identified SpLD profile and barriers to literacy.
- Credit should be given for embedding strategies that foster metacognition, self-advocacy, and independent learning skills, such as teaching learners to use specific assistive tools autonomously.
- Evaluate competency in using a range of assistive and contextual technologies, ensuring they are integrated meaningfully into sessions to remove barriers and enhance learning.