Skip to course topics

    AQA A-Level Philosophy

    Explore your course, one topic at a time.

    Course AQA-A-Level-Philosophy
    Course version · AQA-A-Level-PhilosophyVersion from Mar 2026Change version

    Explore your topics

    4 topics

    Assessment and exam guidance

    What Gets Top Grades

    A*/Grade 9

    Knowledge & Understanding

    Demonstrates comprehensive and accurate knowledge

    • Uses correct subject-specific terminology
    • Shows detailed understanding of concepts
    • Makes accurate connections between topics
    • Demonstrates depth beyond surface-level knowledge

    Application

    Applies knowledge effectively to new contexts

    • Selects relevant knowledge for the question
    • Adapts understanding to unfamiliar scenarios
    • Uses examples appropriately
    • Shows awareness of context

    Analysis & Evaluation

    Develops sophisticated analytical arguments

    • Constructs logical chains of reasoning
    • Considers multiple perspectives
    • Weighs evidence to reach justified conclusions
    • Acknowledges limitations and nuances

    Key Command Words

    AQA
    State
    1 mark

    Give a single fact or term

    Identify
    1 mark

    Name, select, or recognise

    Outline
    2 marks

    Set out main features briefly

    Describe
    2-4 marks

    Give an account of what something is like or what happens

    Explain
    3-6 marks

    Give reasons with developed cause→effect chains

    Compare
    2-4 marks

    State similarities AND differences (both required)

    Analyse
    6-9 marks

    Examine in detail showing cause→effect→consequence chains

    Evaluate
    6-12 marks

    Weigh up BOTH sides, reach JUSTIFIED conclusion

    Assess
    6-12 marks

    Make judgments about importance with justification

    Calculate
    2-4 marks

    Show formula→substitution→calculation→answer with units

    Tips and common mistakes

    Common Exam Mistakes

    Pitfalls to avoid in your exams

    • •Confusing functionalism with behaviourism
    • •Failing to explain how functionalism allows for multiple realisability
    • •Misunderstanding the distinction between functional roles and the physical substrate that realises them
    • •Describing ethical theories in isolation without applying them to the specific issues
    • •Failing to use meta-ethical concepts to deepen the analysis of the applied issues
    • •Confusing the different normative theories (e.g., misapplying Kantian duty to Utilitarian utility calculations)
    • •Lack of critical evaluation of the theories themselves when applied to the case studies
    • •Confusing the verification principle with the falsification principle

    Top Examiner Tips

    Expert advice for exam success

    • •Ensure you can clearly distinguish between functionalism and identity theory
    • •Use specific examples like the China thought experiment to illustrate the problem of absent qualia
    • •Be precise when discussing how the knowledge argument challenges the completeness of functional descriptions
    • •Ensure you can explain how a Utilitarian, a Kantian, and a Virtue Ethicist would each approach the same issue
    • •Use the specific issues as a vehicle to demonstrate your understanding of the normative theories
    • •Practice constructing arguments that weigh competing ethical considerations for each issue
    • •Refer back to the core definitions of good, bad, right, and wrong within each theory when applying them
    • •Ensure you can clearly define the difference between cognitivism and non-cognitivism

    Ready for a little practice?

    Create your account to start practising Philosophy.

    Start free

    7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge