Skip to course topics

    Edexcel A-Level Psychology

    Explore your course, one topic at a time.

    Course version · 9PS0Version from Sept 2015Change version

    Choose your course version: the course code is on your timetable or a past paper. Not sure? We’ll start you on the most likely version when you sign up.

    Explore your topics

    30 study areas

    Content Overview and Assessment Expectations1 topic
    Paper 1: Foundations in psychology13 study areas

    12 of 13 shown

    Paper 2: Applications of psychology17 study areas

    12 of 17 shown

    Paper 3: Psychological skills10 study areas
    Assessment and exam guidance

    Assessment Objectives

    AO1
    30%-35%

    Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of scientific ideas, processes, techniques and procedures

    AO2
    30%-35%

    Apply knowledge and understanding of scientific ideas, processes, techniques and procedures: in a theoretical context; in a practical context; when handling qualitative data; when handling quantitative data

    AO3
    35%-40%

    Analyse, interpret and evaluate scientific information, ideas and evidence, including in relation to issues, to: make judgements and reach conclusions; develop and refine practical design and procedures

    Exam Structure

    Pearson Edexcel A-Level (9PS0)

    Paper 1: Foundations in psychology

    2h 15m

    Duration

    90

    Marks

    35%

    Weighting

    Paper 2: Applications of psychology

    2h 15m

    Duration

    90

    Marks

    35%

    Weighting

    Paper 3: Psychological skills

    2h

    Duration

    80

    Marks

    30%

    Weighting

    Tips and common mistakes

    Common Exam Mistakes

    Pitfalls to avoid in your exams

    • •Emptying the revision notes onto the page when the question sets a context. Detail that ignores the scenario earns knowledge credit only and caps the answer well below the top band.
    • •Treating evaluation as a list of one-line criticisms. An undeveloped point such as the sample was biased, with no statement of the consequence, sits in the bottom level of the mark scheme.
    • •Describing a study at length when the command word is assess or discuss, so most of the writing lands in the wrong objective.
    • •Ignoring the tariff and writing a paragraph for a two-mark definition while writing four lines for a twenty-mark essay.
    • •Using reliable to mean trustworthy. Reliability is consistency, and a consistently biased measure is perfectly reliable and completely invalid at the same time.
    • •Asserting that a laboratory study lacks ecological validity with no reason attached. The real question is whether the task distorts the behaviour being measured, and for obedience to an authority figure a laboratory may be a fair model.
    • •Saying a sample of forty is too small without saying what that does. The weakness is the narrow range of people represented, not the raw number of them.
    • •Treating subjectivity as a fatal flaw in qualitative research instead of a feature handled by reflexivity, triangulation and a clear audit trail.

    Top Examiner Tips

    Expert advice for exam success

    • •Read the tariff as a plan: a twenty-mark extended response needs description, application to the stimulus and sustained evaluation, plus a conclusion that answers the question actually asked.
    • •Underline the scenario details before you start, then check that every paragraph refers back to at least one of them.
    • •Paper 3 is synoptic, so examples may be drawn from any topic area, and the classic studies are explicitly examinable there.
    • •Definitions and short-answer items sit at the front of each section and are the fastest marks on the paper, so do not save them until the end.
    • •Each term is worth a mark when defined precisely in a short-answer item, and the same terms scaffold extended responses, so learn a one-sentence version of each that you can write without thinking.
    • •When asked to evaluate a study, take two of these ideas and develop each one fully rather than naming all six in a list.
    • •Paper 3 questions on the classic and contemporary studies regularly target generalisability or reliability directly, so attach a concrete sample detail to every study you revise.
    • •A comparison item rewards explicit linking: state the shared feature, then the difference, then which method is stronger and why.

    Ready for a little practice?

    Create your account to start practising Psychology.

    Start free

    7 days Premium · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge