Question 1

What is the difference between a numinous experience and a mystical experience?

Accepted Answer

A numinous experience, as described by Rudolf Otto, is a non-rational encounter with the 'mysterium tremendum et fascinans'—a sense of awe, fear, and fascination before a transcendent reality. It is often felt as a 'creature-feeling' of dependence. A mystical experience, by contrast, involves a sense of union or oneness with the divine or ultimate reality, often described as ineffable and noetic (knowledge-giving). While numinous experiences maintain a distinction between the self and the divine, mystical experiences often blur or erase that distinction. Both are types of religious experience but differ in their phenomenology.

Question 2

How does William James defend the validity of religious experiences?

Accepted Answer

William James, in 'The Varieties of Religious Experience', argues that religious experiences should be judged by their 'fruits for life' rather than their origins. He acknowledges that such experiences may have psychological causes (e.g., hysteria), but he insists that their value lies in their practical effects—such as moral improvement, peace, and a sense of purpose. James also identifies four marks of mystical experiences: ineffability, noetic quality, transiency, and passivity. He does not claim that these experiences prove God's existence, but he argues they are authoritative for the individual and cannot be dismissed solely on naturalistic grounds.

Question 3

What is Swinburne's principle of credulity and how does it apply to religious experiences?

Accepted Answer

Richard Swinburne's principle of credulity states that, in general, we should trust our experiences unless we have positive reason to doubt them. Applied to religious experiences, this means that if someone seems to perceive God, we ought to believe that they do, unless there is evidence of deception, hallucination, or a known natural cause. Swinburne also offers a principle of testimony: we should trust others' reports of their experiences unless we have reason to doubt. Together, these principles shift the burden of proof onto the sceptic. However, critics argue that religious experiences are not analogous to sense perception and that the principles are too permissive.

Question 4

Can religious experiences be explained away by psychology or neuroscience?

Accepted Answer

Psychological and neurological explanations, such as those from Freud (projection of a father figure) or recent studies on temporal lobe activity during mystical states, suggest that religious experiences may have natural causes. However, this does not necessarily disprove their religious significance. Critics argue that a causal explanation does not invalidate the experience's truth—if God created the brain, he might use it to facilitate such experiences. Moreover, many experiences occur in healthy individuals without obvious pathology. The debate hinges on whether a natural explanation is sufficient to explain the content and transformative effects of the experience.

Question 5

What are the main challenges to the evidential value of religious experiences?

Accepted Answer

Key challenges include: (1) The problem of conflicting claims—different religions report experiences that support their own doctrines, so they cannot all be veridical. (2) The role of expectation and cultural conditioning—people often experience what they expect based on their upbringing. (3) The possibility of psychological or neurological causes, such as temporal lobe epilepsy or sleep deprivation. (4) The lack of public verification—religious experiences are private and cannot be tested by others. (5) The principle of credulity may be overridden by the fact that such experiences are rare and often occur in suggestible individuals.

Question 6

How do religious experiences relate to the problem of evil?

Accepted Answer

The problem of evil challenges the existence of an all-powerful, all-loving God given the presence of suffering. Some argue that religious experiences, which often involve a sense of God's love and presence, provide counter-evidence to this problem. If people genuinely encounter a loving God, that may outweigh abstract arguments about evil. However, sceptics respond that the experiences could be delusory, and the sheer scale of evil makes it unlikely that a good God would allow it. The debate continues, with some philosophers (e.g., Swinburne) arguing that religious experiences can be part of a cumulative case for theism despite evil.

Religious experience

Topic Overview

Key Concepts

What You Need to Demonstrate

Marking Points

Examiner Tips

Common Mistakes

Frequently Asked Questions

Before You Start

Study Guide Available

Key Terminology

Likely Command Words

Ready to test yourself?

Related Topics in AQA A-Level Religious Studies

2A Buddhism

2B Christianity

2C Hinduism

2D Islam

Topic Synopsis

Key Concepts & Core Principles

Exam Tips & Revision Strategies

Common Misconceptions & Mistakes to Avoid

Examiner Marking Points