Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    E11c — AQA GCSE Statistics

    Test yourself on E11c with AQA GCSE practice questions.

    Start free

    7 days Premium · Then free forever · No card, no charge

    Your focus

    1. Use action and warning lines in quality assurance sampling applications.

    E11c exam tips

    Quick Revision Summary (Key Takeaway)

    E11c in AQA GCSE Statistics refers to the statistical analysis and interpretation of bivariate data using scatter diagrams, correlation, and lines of best fit. Students must calculate and interpret the product moment correlation coefficient (PMCC) and understand its limitations when describing relationships between two quantitative variables.

    Topic Overview

    E11c is a key topic in AQA GCSE Statistics that focuses on bivariate data analysis. You will learn how to construct and interpret scatter diagrams, identify different types of correlation (positive, negative, none), and draw a line of best fit to make predictions. The topic also covers the calculation and interpretation of the product moment correlation coefficient (PMCC), a numerical measure of linear correlation.

    Understanding E11c is essential for analysing relationships between two variables in real-world contexts, such as height and weight, temperature and ice cream sales, or study time and exam performance. It builds on your knowledge of representing data and calculating summary statistics, and it prepares you for more advanced statistical techniques like regression. Mastery of this topic will enable you to critically evaluate claims of correlation and avoid common pitfalls such as confusing correlation with causation.

    Key Concepts
    • →Scatter diagrams visually display the relationship between two quantitative variables, with one variable on the x-axis and the other on the y-axis.
    • →Correlation describes the strength and direction of a linear relationship: positive correlation (both variables increase together), negative correlation (one increases as the other decreases), or no correlation.
    • →The product moment correlation coefficient (PMCC), denoted r, is a number between -1 and 1 that quantifies the strength and direction of linear correlation. Values close to 1 or -1 indicate strong correlation; values close to 0 indicate weak or no linear correlation.
    • →A line of best fit is a straight line drawn through the centre of the data points on a scatter diagram, used to make predictions. It should pass through the mean point (x̄, ȳ).
    • →Correlation does not imply causation; a strong correlation between two variables does not mean that one causes the other. There may be a confounding variable or the relationship may be coincidental.
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡When interpreting the PMCC, always comment on both the strength (e.g., strong, moderate, weak) and the direction (positive or negative) of the correlation, and relate it to the context of the question.
    • 💡For scatter diagram questions, ensure you label axes correctly with units and use a sensible scale. When drawing a line of best fit, use a ruler and aim for roughly equal numbers of points above and below the line.
    • 💡In questions asking about predictions, always state whether the prediction is interpolation (within the data range) or extrapolation (outside the data range) and comment on reliability accordingly.
    Common Mistakes
    • Students often think that a strong correlation means one variable causes the other. Correction: Correlation only indicates a relationship; causation requires further evidence, often from controlled experiments.
    • Students may believe that the PMCC can only be positive. Correction: The PMCC can be negative, indicating a negative linear correlation, and ranges from -1 to 1.
    • Students sometimes draw a line of best fit that connects the first and last points rather than balancing points above and below the line. Correction: The line of best fit should minimise the distances to all points and pass through the mean point.
    Revision Plan
    1. 1Day 1-2: Revise the basics of scatter diagrams: how to plot points, label axes, and describe correlation in words. Practice identifying positive, negative, and no correlation from given diagrams.
    2. 2Day 3-4: Learn the formula for PMCC and practice calculating it using summary statistics. Check your answers using a calculator or spreadsheet. Focus on interpreting the value in context.
    3. 3Day 5-6: Practice drawing lines of best fit on scatter diagrams and using them to make predictions. Understand the difference between interpolation and extrapolation and when predictions are reliable.
    4. 4Day 7-8: Work through exam-style questions on E11c, including those that require interpretation and comments on correlation vs causation. Review mark schemes to understand what examiners expect.
    5. 5Day 9-10: Complete a timed practice paper or set of questions under exam conditions. Review any mistakes and revisit weak areas. Create a summary sheet of key points and formulas.
    Exam Question Types
    • 📋Description and interpretation of scatter diagrams: You may be asked to describe the correlation shown in a scatter diagram and comment on any outliers. Advice: Use precise language such as 'strong positive correlation' and mention the context.
    • 📋Calculation of the PMCC: You will be given summary statistics and asked to calculate r. Advice: Show all steps clearly, use the formula correctly, and round your answer to 2 or 3 decimal places as required.
    • 📋Drawing and using a line of best fit: You may need to draw a line of best fit on a scatter diagram and use it to estimate a value. Advice: Use a ruler, ensure the line passes through the mean point, and read values accurately from the graph.
    • 📋Commenting on correlation vs causation: You may be asked to evaluate a statement that implies causation from correlation. Advice: State that correlation does not imply causation and suggest possible confounding variables.
    Command Word Expectations (AQA)
    Calculate

    You must use the given data or formula to work out a numerical answer. Show all steps of your working, and round appropriately if required. For PMCC, use the formula and substitute correctly.

    Interpret

    You must explain what a result means in the context of the question. For example, interpret the PMCC by stating the strength and direction of correlation and what it implies about the variables.

    Comment

    You must give a brief statement or opinion based on the data, often about reliability or causation. For example, comment on whether a prediction is reliable or whether a correlation implies causation.

    How Students Lose Marks (Examiner Pitfalls)
    Pitfall: Students often describe correlation as causation, or fail to recognise that correlation only measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables.
    ❌ Weak Answer (Loses Marks):There is a strong positive correlation between ice cream sales and drowning incidents, so eating ice cream causes drowning.
    Example improved answer:There is a strong positive correlation between ice cream sales and drowning incidents. However, this does not imply causation; a third variable such as temperature or season likely influences both, so we cannot conclude that ice cream consumption causes drowning.
    Examiner Tip: Always state that correlation does not imply causation and suggest a possible confounding variable when interpreting real-world data.
    Pitfall: When calculating the product moment correlation coefficient (PMCC), students frequently make arithmetic errors or misinterpret the value, especially confusing the sign or strength.
    ❌ Weak Answer (Loses Marks):The PMCC is 0.85, so there is a weak positive correlation.
    Example improved answer:The PMCC is 0.85, which indicates a strong positive linear correlation between the two variables. This means that as one variable increases, the other tends to increase as well, and the points lie close to a straight line with positive gradient.
    Examiner Tip: Remember that PMCC values range from -1 to 1. Values close to 1 or -1 indicate strong correlation; values close to 0 indicate weak or no linear correlation. Always interpret both the sign and the magnitude.
    Step-by-Step Worked Solutions

    Question: A researcher collects data on the number of hours studied (x) and exam scores (y) for 10 students. The summary statistics are: Σx = 50, Σy = 600, Σx² = 300, Σy² = 38000, Σxy = 3200. Calculate the product moment correlation coefficient (PMCC) and interpret your result.

    1. 1.Step 1: Identify given facts: n = 10, Σx = 50, Σy = 600, Σx² = 300, Σy² = 38000, Σxy = 3200.
    2. 2.Step 2: Apply the PMCC formula: r = (nΣxy - ΣxΣy) / sqrt((nΣx² - (Σx)²)(nΣy² - (Σy)²)).
    3. 3.Step 3: Substitute values: numerator = 10*3200 - 50*600 = 32000 - 30000 = 2000. Denominator part 1: 10*300 - 50² = 3000 - 2500 = 500. Denominator part 2: 10*38000 - 600² = 380000 - 360000 = 20000. So r = 2000 / sqrt(500*20000) = 2000 / sqrt(10000000) = 2000 / 3162.27766 ≈ 0.632.
    4. 4.Step 4: Interpret: r ≈ 0.632, indicating a moderate positive linear correlation between hours studied and exam scores.
    Final Answer: The PMCC is approximately 0.632, showing a moderate positive correlation. This suggests that students who study more hours tend to achieve higher exam scores, but the relationship is not very strong.

    Question: A scatter diagram shows a strong negative correlation between the age of a car (in years) and its resale value (in thousands of pounds). The line of best fit is given by y = -1.5x + 20. Predict the resale value of a 6-year-old car and comment on the reliability of this prediction.

    1. 1.Step 1: Identify the equation of the line of best fit: y = -1.5x + 20, where x is age in years and y is resale value in thousands.
    2. 2.Step 2: Substitute x = 6 into the equation: y = -1.5(6) + 20 = -9 + 20 = 11.
    3. 3.Step 3: Interpret the result: The predicted resale value is 11 thousand pounds, i.e., £11,000.
    4. 4.Step 4: Comment on reliability: Since the data shows a strong negative correlation and the prediction is within the range of the data (assuming ages up to around 10 years), the prediction is likely reliable. However, extrapolation beyond the data range would be unreliable.
    Final Answer: The predicted resale value is £11,000. This prediction is reliable if 6 years is within the range of the observed data; otherwise, it is an extrapolation and may be unreliable.
    Active Recall Memory Test
    What does a PMCC of -0.9 indicate about the relationship between two variables?
    Key Fact: A PMCC of -0.9 indicates a strong negative linear correlation: as one variable increases, the other tends to decrease, and the points lie close to a straight line with negative gradient.
    What is the difference between interpolation and extrapolation when using a line of best fit?
    Key Fact: Interpolation is making a prediction within the range of the observed data, which is generally reliable. Extrapolation is making a prediction outside the range of the observed data, which is less reliable because the trend may not continue.
    Why does correlation not imply causation? Give an example.
    Key Fact: Correlation does not imply causation because a third variable (confounding variable) may influence both variables, or the relationship may be coincidental. For example, ice cream sales and drowning incidents are correlated because both increase in summer, but ice cream does not cause drowning.
    What are the key features to include when describing a scatter diagram?
    Key Fact: When describing a scatter diagram, mention the type of correlation (positive, negative, none), the strength (strong, moderate, weak), any outliers, and the context of the variables.
    Frequently Asked Questions
    What is the product moment correlation coefficient (PMCC) and how do I calculate it?
    The PMCC, denoted r, is a number between -1 and 1 that measures the strength and direction of linear correlation between two variables. It is calculated using the formula r = (nΣxy - ΣxΣy) / sqrt((nΣx² - (Σx)²)(nΣy² - (Σy)²)), where n is the number of pairs of data. You will be given the summary statistics in the exam, so you just need to substitute and evaluate carefully.
    How do I know if a correlation is strong or weak?
    The strength of correlation is determined by how close the PMCC is to 1 or -1. Generally, values between 0.7 and 1 (or -0.7 and -1) indicate strong correlation, values between 0.3 and 0.7 (or -0.3 and -0.7) indicate moderate correlation, and values between 0 and 0.3 (or 0 and -0.3) indicate weak correlation. However, always interpret in context and consider the scatter diagram.
    What is the difference between correlation and causation?
    Correlation means there is a statistical relationship between two variables, but it does not mean that one variable causes the other to change. Causation means that a change in one variable directly causes a change in the other. For example, there is a correlation between shoe size and reading ability in children, but shoe size does not cause reading ability; both are influenced by age.
    How do I draw a line of best fit on a scatter diagram?
    To draw a line of best fit, use a ruler and position the line so that it passes through the mean point (x̄, ȳ) and has roughly equal numbers of points above and below it. The line should follow the general trend of the data. It does not have to pass through the origin or any specific point, and it should be drawn with a pencil so you can adjust it if needed.
    Can the PMCC be greater than 1 or less than -1?
    No, the PMCC is always between -1 and 1 inclusive. A value of 1 indicates perfect positive linear correlation, -1 indicates perfect negative linear correlation, and 0 indicates no linear correlation. If you calculate a value outside this range, you have made an arithmetic error.
    What does it mean if the PMCC is 0?
    If the PMCC is 0, it means there is no linear correlation between the two variables. However, there could still be a non-linear relationship (e.g., a curve). Always look at the scatter diagram to confirm the nature of the relationship.