AQA · GCSE · Combined Science
Course version: 8464 · Version from Sept 2018
Describe the limitations of using dot and cross, ball and stick, two and…
Full specification wording
Ionic compounds: describe the limitations of using dot and cross, ball and stick, two and three-dimensional diagrams to represent a giant ionic structure
Every model of a giant ionic structure is a simplification, so each has limitations.
Checked against the AQA 8464 specification (opens in a new tab) on .
- Point 4 of 6
Study notes
From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.
The idea
Every model of a giant ionic structure is a simplification, so each has limitations. Dot and cross diagrams show electron transfer and charges clearly, but they usually show only a few ions, so they hide the huge repeating lattice and give no sense of scale or three-dimensional shape. Ball and stick models show the arrangement and relative positions of ions, but the sticks suggest directional bonds, which ionic lattices do not have, and the balls are far too small compared with the spaces between ions. Two-dimensional diagrams flatten a three-dimensional lattice, so they miss the way ions surround each other in all directions. Three-dimensional models are better but still cannot show the true scale, the strong electrostatic forces in every direction, or the fact that the lattice is effectively endless.
What earns the marks
- Explain that dot and cross diagrams show only a small number of ions, so they do not convey the giant repeating nature of the lattice.
- State that ball and stick models use sticks that imply directional covalent bonds, whereas ionic attraction acts in all directions.
- Describe how two-dimensional diagrams flatten a three-dimensional lattice and so misrepresent the arrangement of ions.
- Note that models do not show the true scale, because ions and the distances between them are not drawn to scale.
- Recognise that even three-dimensional models cannot show the lattice as effectively infinite or fully represent the electrostatic forces.
Common mistakes and how to put them right
Saying ball and stick models show the ions touching.
Put it right: The balls are much smaller than the spaces between ions, so the model is not to scale.
Claiming dot and cross diagrams show the whole lattice.
Put it right: They show only a few ions and omit the repeating three-dimensional pattern.
Stating that the sticks in ball and stick models represent ionic bonds in fixed directions.
Put it right: Ionic attraction is non-directional and acts in all directions.
Exam tips
- Name the specific model in each limitation, so the examiner can see which diagram you are criticising.
- Contrast what the model does show with what it fails to show, for example charges shown but scale missing.
- Use precise terms such as lattice, three-dimensional, scale and electrostatic forces rather than vague words like 'not accurate'.
Try the lesson
The start of the Ionic compounds: describe the limitations of using dot and cross, ball and stick, two and three-dimensional diagrams to represent a giant ionic structure lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.
Have a go first
A student draws a dot and cross diagram for sodium chloride. What is a limitation of this diagram?
Listen
Every model of a giant ionic structure is a simplification, so each has limitations. Dot and cross diagrams show electron transfer and charges clearly, but they usually show only a few ions, so they hide the huge repeating lattice and give no sense of scale or three-dimensional shape. Ball and stick models show the arrangement and relative positions of ions, but the sticks suggest directional bonds, which ionic lattices do not have, and the balls are far too small compared with the spaces between ions. Two-dimensional diagrams flatten a three-dimensional lattice, so they miss the way ions surround each other in all directions. Three-dimensional models are better but still cannot show the true scale, the strong electrostatic forces in every direction, or the fact that the lattice is effectively endless. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explain that dot and cross diagrams show only a small number of ions, so they do not convey the giant repeating nature of the lattice. State that ball and stick models use sticks that imply directional covalent bonds, whereas ionic attraction acts in all directions. Describe how two-dimensional diagrams flatten a three-dimensional lattice and so misrepresent the arrangement of ions. Note that models do not show the true scale, because ions and the distances between them are not drawn to scale. A common slip: Saying ball and stick models show the ions touching. Instead, the balls are much smaller than the spaces between ions, so the model is not to scale. Exam tip: Name the specific model in each limitation, so the examiner can see which diagram you are criticising.
There is more to this lesson
The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Test your understanding of Ionic compounds: describe the limitations of using dot and cross, ball and stick, two and three-dimensional diagrams to represent a giant ionic structure
Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge