AQA · GCSE · Combined Science
Course version: 8464 · Version from Sept 2018
Scientists and concerned citizens have put in place programmes to reduce…
Full specification wording
Maintaining biodiversity: Scientists and concerned citizens have put in place programmes to reduce the negative effects of humans on ecosystems and biodiversity.
Programmes reduce human harm to ecosystems and biodiversity.
Checked against the AQA 8464 specification (opens in a new tab) on .
- Point 2 of 8
- 2 key terms
Study notes
From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.
The idea
Programmes reduce human harm to ecosystems and biodiversity. Scientists collect data on species numbers, water quality and habitat extent, then advise on limits and restoration. Concerned citizens join surveys, volunteer conservation work, donate, campaign and change their own behaviour. Examples include breeding programmes for endangered species, seed banks, protected reserves, fishing quotas, recycling schemes and replanting projects. These programmes work by protecting habitats, reducing pollution and resource use, and reconnecting fragmented habitats so populations can recover. Their success is judged by monitoring: comparing species counts, water quality or habitat area before and after the programme. A programme may also involve laws, international agreements and education, because biodiversity loss crosses borders.
What earns the marks
- Identifies a programme such as a breeding programme, seed bank, nature reserve, fishing quota, recycling scheme or habitat restoration project.
- States the negative effect it targets, such as habitat loss, overexploitation, pollution or introduced species.
- Explains the mechanism: protecting or restoring habitat, limiting catches or emissions, or reconnecting fragmented habitats.
- Describes how scientists contribute, for example by surveying species, monitoring water quality or advising on sustainable limits.
- Describes how citizens contribute, for example by volunteering, recording wildlife, donating, campaigning or changing consumption.
- Explains how success is evaluated by comparing biodiversity data before and after the programme.
Common mistakes and how to put them right
Claiming a programme removes all harm.
Put it right: State that it reduces or limits negative effects, because some impact usually remains.
Naming a programme without its mechanism.
Put it right: Add how it protects habitats or species, otherwise the answer stays descriptive.
Assuming only scientists act.
Put it right: Include citizen roles such as surveys, volunteering and campaigning, because the statement names both groups.
Exam tips
- Name the programme, state the negative effect it targets, then explain how it reduces that effect.
- Include one scientist role and one citizen role to cover both parts of the statement.
- Mention monitoring data as evidence that a programme is working.
Try the lesson
The start of the Maintaining biodiversity: Scientists and concerned citizens have put in place programmes to reduce the negative effects of humans on ecosystems and biodiversity. lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.
Have a go first
Which of these is a programme set up to reduce the negative effects of humans on ecosystems and biodiversity?
Listen
Programmes reduce human harm to ecosystems and biodiversity. Scientists collect data on species numbers, water quality and habitat extent, then advise on limits and restoration. Concerned citizens join surveys, volunteer conservation work, donate, campaign and change their own behaviour. Examples include breeding programmes for endangered species, seed banks, protected reserves, fishing quotas, recycling schemes and replanting projects. These programmes work by protecting habitats, reducing pollution and resource use, and reconnecting fragmented habitats so populations can recover. Their success is judged by monitoring: comparing species counts, water quality or habitat area before and after the programme. A programme may also involve laws, international agreements and education, because biodiversity loss crosses borders. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Identifies a programme such as a breeding programme, seed bank, nature reserve, fishing quota, recycling scheme or habitat restoration project. States the negative effect it targets, such as habitat loss, overexploitation, pollution or introduced species. Explains the mechanism: protecting or restoring habitat, limiting catches or emissions, or reconnecting fragmented habitats. Describes how scientists contribute, for example by surveying species, monitoring water quality or advising on sustainable limits. Exam tip: Name the programme, state the negative effect it targets, then explain how it reduces that effect.
Key words
Say what each word means before you turn the card.
Conservation programmes
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Monitoring biodiversity
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
See every definition
- Conservation programmes
- Programmes put in place by scientists and concerned citizens to reduce the negative effects of humans on ecosystems and biodiversity.
- Monitoring biodiversity
- Judging the success of a programme by comparing species counts, water quality or habitat area before and after the programme.
There is more to this lesson
The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Test your understanding of Maintaining biodiversity: Scientists and concerned citizens have put in place programmes to reduce the negative effects of humans on ecosystems and biodiversity.
Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge