AQA · GCSE · Combined Science

    Course version: 8464 · Version from Sept 2018

    Why the new evidence from the scattering experiment led to a change in the…

    Full specification wording

    The development of the model of the atom (common content with chemistry): why the new evidence from the scattering experiment led to a change in the atomic model

    This statement asks you to explain the reasoning that connects the results of the alpha particle scattering experiment to the replacement of the plum pudding model.

    Checked against the AQA 8464 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 9 of 10
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    This statement asks you to explain the reasoning that connects the results of the alpha particle scattering experiment to the replacement of the plum pudding model. In the experiment, positively charged alpha particles were fired at thin gold foil. Most passed straight through, some were deflected through small angles, and a very small number bounced back. The plum pudding model predicted only tiny deflections because its positive charge was spread thinly throughout the atom. The observed large deflections and rebounds could only happen if positive charge were concentrated in a tiny, dense region, so Rutherford proposed the nuclear model with a small positive nucleus and mostly empty space. Explaining means linking each observation to a conclusion about atomic structure.

    What earns the marks

    • States that most alpha particles passed straight through the foil, showing the atom is mostly empty space.
    • States that some alpha particles were deflected, showing they passed near a concentrated positive charge.
    • States that a very small number were deflected back, showing a tiny, dense, positively charged centre.
    • Explains that the plum pudding model could not account for large deflections because its positive charge was spread out.
    • Concludes that the evidence led to the nuclear model with a small positive nucleus and electrons outside it.
    • Uses the idea that like charges repel to explain why alpha particles were deflected by the nucleus.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Saying most particles were deflected.

      Put it right by stating most passed straight through and only a few were deflected.

    • Claiming the nucleus is negative.

      Put it right by stating the nucleus is positive, which is why positive alpha particles are repelled.

    • Saying the experiment proved electrons orbit in shells.

      Put it right by stating the scattering evidence supported a small positive nucleus, while electron shells came from later work.

    Exam tips

    • Link each observation to its conclusion in a because sentence, for example most passed through because the atom is mostly empty space.
    • Use the word repel when explaining why alpha particles changed direction near the nucleus.
    • Compare the prediction of the plum pudding model with the actual result to show why the model changed.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the The development of the model of the atom (common content with chemistry): why the new evidence from the scattering experiment led to a change in the atomic model lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    In the alpha-particle scattering experiment, most alpha particles passed straight through the gold foil. What did this observation show about the atom?

    Listen

    This statement asks you to explain the reasoning that connects the results of the alpha particle scattering experiment to the replacement of the plum pudding model. In the experiment, positively charged alpha particles were fired at thin gold foil. Most passed straight through, some were deflected through small angles, and a very small number bounced back. The plum pudding model predicted only tiny deflections because its positive charge was spread thinly throughout the atom. The observed large deflections and rebounds could only happen if positive charge were concentrated in a tiny, dense region, so Rutherford proposed the nuclear model with a small positive nucleus and mostly empty space. Explaining means linking each observation to a conclusion about atomic structure. A strong answer earns marks for these points. States that most alpha particles passed straight through the foil, showing the atom is mostly empty space. States that some alpha particles were deflected, showing they passed near a concentrated positive charge. States that a very small number were deflected back, showing a tiny, dense, positively charged centre. Explains that the plum pudding model could not account for large deflections because its positive charge was spread out. A common slip: Saying most particles were deflected. Instead, stating most passed straight through and only a few were deflected. Exam tip: Link each observation to its conclusion in a because sentence, for example most passed through because the atom is mostly empty space.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Evidence and explanation

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Atomic structure

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Charge and repulsion

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Model replacement in science

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Evidence and explanation
    Linking each observation from the scattering experiment to a conclusion about atomic structure, for example most alpha particles passed through because the atom is mostly empty space.
    Atomic structure
    The atom is mostly empty space with a tiny, dense, positively charged centre and electrons outside it.
    Charge and repulsion
    Like charges repel, which explains why positive alpha particles were deflected by the positive nucleus.
    Model replacement in science
    The plum pudding model could not account for large deflections because its positive charge was spread out, so the evidence led to the nuclear model.

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of The development of the model of the atom (common content with chemistry): why the new evidence from the scattering experiment led to a change in the atomic model

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge