AQA · A-Level · History
Course version: 7042 · Version from Sept 2017
Russia, 1917–1953 – Economy and society, 1929–1941 (A-level only):…
Full specification wording
2N Revolution and dictatorship: Russia, 1917–1953 – Economy and society, 1929–1941 (A-level only): Industrial and social developments in towns and cities: Gosplan; the organisation, aims and results of the first three Five Year Plans; new industrial centres and projects; the involvement of foreign companies; the working and living conditions of managers, workers and women; Stakhanovites; the success of the Five Year Plans
Stalin’s industrialisation drive relied on Gosplan to organise the first three Five Year Plans, aiming to rapidly modernise the USSR.
Checked against the AQA 7042 specification (opens in a new tab) on .
- Point 2 of 4
- 4 key terms
Study notes
From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.
The idea
Stalin’s industrialisation drive relied on Gosplan to organise the first three Five Year Plans, aiming to rapidly modernise the USSR. These plans yielded massive results in heavy industry, creating new industrial centres like Magnitogorsk and prestige projects, often aided by foreign companies like Ford. However, rapid urbanisation caused severe overcrowding, resulting in appalling living and working conditions for workers and managers, despite the influx of women into the workforce. The Stakhanovite movement was engineered to drive productivity through unrealistic targets. Ultimately, while the plans successfully transformed the USSR into an industrial powerhouse, they ignored consumer goods and exacted a terrible human cost.
What earns the marks
- Explain the role of Gosplan in setting top-down production targets for the first three Five Year Plans.
- Detail the aims and results of the plans, noting the focus on heavy industry and the neglect of consumer goods.
- Identify key industrial centres and projects, and the reliance on foreign companies for technological transfer.
- Analyse the harsh working and living conditions in towns, including the pressures on managers and the changing role of women in industry.
- Evaluate the Stakhanovite movement as a propaganda tool to increase worker productivity and justify higher quotas.
- Assess the overall success of the Five Year Plans, balancing industrial output achievements against the decline in living standards.
Common mistakes and how to put them right
Assuming the Five Year Plans were meticulously planned and executed.
Put it right: Highlight that Gosplan often set chaotic, unrealistic targets leading to falsified production figures and systemic inefficiencies.
Stating that living standards improved during the 1930s.
Put it right: Emphasise that rapid urbanisation led to severe housing shortages, rationing, and a decline in real wages for workers.
Overlooking the role of foreign companies.
Put it right: Explicitly mention that Western experts and companies, such as Ford, were crucial in designing and equipping new Soviet industrial projects.
Exam tips
- Contrast the official propaganda of the Stakhanovite movement with the reality of working conditions and managerial stress.
- Use specific examples of new industrial projects, such as Magnitogorsk or the Dnieper Dam, to illustrate the scale of the Five Year Plans.
- Remember that these industrial developments specifically relate to the 1929–1941 period, preparing the Soviet Union for potential war.
Try the lesson
The start of the 2N Revolution and dictatorship: Russia, 1917–1953 – Economy and society, 1929–1941 (A-level only): Industrial and social developments in towns and cities: Gosplan; the organisation, aims and results of the first three Five Year Plans; new industrial centres and projects; the involvement of foreign companies; the working and living conditions of managers, workers and women; Stakhanovites; the success of the Five Year Plans lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.
Have a go first
Who were the 'Stakhanovites' in the context of the Soviet Five Year Plans?
Listen
Stalin’s industrialisation drive relied on Gosplan to organise the first three Five Year Plans, aiming to rapidly modernise the USSR. These plans yielded massive results in heavy industry, creating new industrial centres like Magnitogorsk and prestige projects, often aided by foreign companies like Ford. However, rapid urbanisation caused severe overcrowding, resulting in appalling living and working conditions for workers and managers, despite the influx of women into the workforce. The Stakhanovite movement was engineered to drive productivity through unrealistic targets. Ultimately, while the plans successfully transformed the USSR into an industrial powerhouse, they ignored consumer goods and exacted a terrible human cost. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Explain the role of Gosplan in setting top-down production targets for the first three Five Year Plans. Detail the aims and results of the plans, noting the focus on heavy industry and the neglect of consumer goods. Identify key industrial centres and projects, and the reliance on foreign companies for technological transfer. Analyse the harsh working and living conditions in towns, including the pressures on managers and the changing role of women in industry. A common slip: Assuming the Five Year Plans were meticulously planned and executed. Instead, Highlight that Gosplan often set chaotic, unrealistic targets leading to falsified production figures and systemic inefficiencies. Exam tip: Contrast the official propaganda of the Stakhanovite movement with the reality of working conditions and managerial stress.
Key words
Say what each word means before you turn the card.
Gosplan
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Stakhanovites
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Five Year Plans
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
Foreign companies
Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.
See every definition
- Gosplan
- The body that organised the first three Five Year Plans, setting top-down production targets.
- Stakhanovites
- A movement engineered as a propaganda tool to drive productivity through unrealistic targets and justify higher quotas.
- Five Year Plans
- Plans whose aims and results focused on heavy industry while neglecting consumer goods, transforming the USSR into an industrial powerhouse at a terrible human cost.
- Foreign companies
- Western firms, such as Ford, relied on for technological transfer in designing and equipping new Soviet industrial projects.
There is more to this lesson
The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge
Test your understanding of 2N Revolution and dictatorship: Russia, 1917–1953 – Economy and society, 1929–1941 (A-level only): Industrial and social developments in towns and cities: Gosplan; the organisation, aims and results of the first three Five Year Plans; new industrial centres and projects; the involvement of foreign companies; the working and living conditions of managers, workers and women; Stakhanovites; the success of the Five Year Plans
Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.
A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge