The Multi-Store Model of Memory Revision Notes

    Subject: Psychology | Level: A-Level | Exam Board: AQA

    The Multi-Store Model of Memory (MSM), proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin in 1968, is a foundational theory in cognitive psychology. It provides a simple, linear framework for how information is processed from our senses into our permanent memory, making it a crucial topic for understanding how memory works and a frequent subject of exam questions.

    Revision Notes & Key Concepts

    ![The Multi-Store Model of Memory - A Linear Journey](https://xnnrgnazirrqvdgfhvou.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/study-guide-assets/guide_eb86ec3a-c63b-4804-a3ee-8c50514a7894/header_image.png) ## Overview The Multi-Store Model of Memory (MSM) is a structural model proposed by Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin in 1968. It describes memory in terms of information flowing through a system of three distinct, unitary stores: the Sensory Register (SR), Short-Term Memory (STM), and Long-Term Memory (LTM). This model was one of the first to present a clear, testable framework for memory, viewing it as an active information processing system, much like a computer. For AQA A-Level Psychology candidates, a precise understanding of this model is essential. Examiners expect candidates to be able to describe the characteristics of each store (coding, capacity, and duration) with accuracy, explain the transfer processes (attention and rehearsal) that move information between the stores, and critically evaluate the model using a range of supporting and refuting evidence. Marks are awarded for demonstrating a clear understanding of the model's linear nature and its limitations, particularly the idea that the stores are unitary. ![Podcast: Mastering the Multi-Store Model](https://xnnrgnazirrqvdgfhvou.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/study-guide-assets/guide_eb86ec3a-c63b-4804-a3ee-8c50514a7894/multi_store_model_of_memory_podcast.mp3) ## The Three Stores of Memory ### The Sensory Register (SR) * **What it is**: The first point of contact for all sensory information from the environment. It is not a single store but comprises multiple registers for each sense (e.g., iconic for visual, echoic for auditory). * **Coding**: Modality-specific. Information is stored in the same form it is sensed (e.g., visual information as images). * **Capacity**: Very large, potentially unlimited. It can hold a vast amount of information from our senses at any one time. * **Duration**: Extremely brief. Visual information in the iconic store lasts for about half a second, while auditory information in the echoic store lasts for 2-4 seconds. Information that is not attended to is lost through rapid decay. * **Transfer**: Information passes from the SR to the STM only if attention is paid to it. ### Short-Term Memory (STM) * **What it is**: A temporary store for information currently in conscious awareness. It holds information that we are actively thinking about. * **Coding**: Primarily acoustic. Information is stored based on how it sounds. This was supported by Conrad (1964), who found that participants made more errors recalling acoustically similar letters (e.g., 'B', 'P') than acoustically dissimilar ones. * **Capacity**: Limited. George Miller (1956) famously described the capacity as the 'magical number seven, plus or minus two' (i.e., 5-9 chunks of information). A 'chunk' is a meaningful unit of information. * **Duration**: Limited, typically 18-30 seconds without rehearsal. Peterson & Peterson (1959) demonstrated this by showing that recall of a three-consonant trigram dropped significantly after 18 seconds if participants were prevented from rehearsing. * **Transfer**: Information is kept in STM through maintenance rehearsal (simple repetition). It is transferred to LTM through elaborative rehearsal (linking to existing knowledge). ### Long-Term Memory (LTM) * **What it is**: The potentially permanent memory store for information that has been rehearsed for a prolonged time. * **Coding**: Primarily semantic. Information is stored based on its meaning. Baddeley (1966) found that participants had difficulty recalling semantically similar words from LTM, suggesting that LTM is organised by meaning. * **Capacity**: Functionally unlimited. There is no known limit to the amount of information that can be stored in LTM. * **Duration**: Potentially a lifetime. Some memories can last for an entire lifetime, although they can be lost through decay or interference. * **Transfer**: Information is retrieved from LTM back into STM so that it can be used. ![Flowchart of the Multi-Store Model (Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968)](https://xnnrgnazirrqvdgfhvou.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/study-guide-assets/guide_eb86ec3a-c63b-4804-a3ee-8c50514a7894/msm_flowchart.png) ## Evaluation of the Multi-Store Model ### Supporting Evidence * **Serial Position Effect**: Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) found that when participants were asked to recall a list of words, they tended to remember the first few (the primacy effect) and the last few (the recency effect) best. The primacy effect occurs because the first words have been rehearsed and transferred to LTM, while the recency effect occurs because the last words are still in STM. This supports the idea of separate STM and LTM stores. ![The Serial Position Effect (Glanzer & Cunitz, 1966)](https://xnnrgnazirrqvdgfhvou.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/study-guide-assets/guide_eb86ec3a-c63b-4804-a3ee-8c50514a7894/serial_position_effect.png) * **Case Study of HM (Henry Molaison)**: After surgery to treat epilepsy which involved removing his hippocampus, HM was unable to form new long-term memories (anterograde amnesia). However, his short-term memory was largely intact. This dissociation between his damaged LTM and functioning STM provides strong evidence that these are separate and distinct memory stores. ### Refuting Evidence * **The Model is Too Simplistic**: The MSM suggests that both STM and LTM are single, unitary stores. However, evidence suggests this is not the case. The Working Memory Model (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974) shows that STM is a more complex, multi-component system. Similarly, research into LTM has identified different types, such as episodic, semantic, and procedural memory (Tulving, 1972). * **Case Study of KF**: Shallice and Warrington (1970) reported on the case of KF, who suffered brain damage from a motorcycle accident. His STM was severely impaired (digit span of only 1 or 2), but his LTM was largely unaffected. According to the MSM, information must pass through STM to get to LTM, so KF should not have been able to form new long-term memories. This case challenges the linear, sequential nature of the model. ![Key Case Study Evidence: HM vs KF](https://xnnrgnazirrqvdgfhvou.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/study-guide-assets/guide_eb86ec3a-c63b-4804-a3ee-8c50514a7894/case_studies_hm_kf.png) * **Role of Rehearsal**: The MSM emphasizes the role of maintenance rehearsal in transferring information to LTM. However, Craik and Watkins (1973) argued that the type of rehearsal is more important than the amount. Elaborative rehearsal, where information is processed more deeply and linked to existing knowledge, is more effective for LTM storage. This suggests the transfer process is more complex than the MSM suggests.

    Revision Podcast Transcript

    PODCAST SCRIPT: The Multi-Store Model of Memory AQA A-Level Psychology — Study Guide Audio Episode Approximate runtime: 10 minutes Voice: Warm, enthusiastic female tutor --- [INTRO — approx. 1 minute] Hello and welcome! I'm so glad you've pressed play, because today we're diving into one of the most foundational topics in AQA A-Level Psychology — the Multi-Store Model of Memory, proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin back in 1968. Now, whether you're revising for your first mock or polishing your technique ahead of the real thing, this episode is going to walk you through everything you need — the model itself, the key studies, the exam tips, a quick-fire quiz, and a summary you can carry with you. So grab a pen, get comfortable, and let's get into it. The Multi-Store Model is one of those topics that sounds simple on the surface — three boxes and some arrows, right? But trust me, the marks are in the detail. Examiners are looking for precise knowledge of coding, capacity, and duration for each store, and they want you to evaluate the model with real, named evidence. By the end of this episode, you'll know exactly how to do that. --- [CORE CONCEPTS — approx. 5 minutes] Let's start with the big picture. Atkinson and Shiffrin proposed that memory is not one single thing — it's a system made up of three separate stores, each with distinct characteristics. Information flows through these stores in a linear sequence, a bit like a production line. The three stores are: the Sensory Register, Short-Term Memory, and Long-Term Memory. Let's take each one in turn. First up — the Sensory Register, or SR. Every single second, your senses are bombarded with information — sights, sounds, smells, touch. The Sensory Register is where all of this raw sensory data lands first. It has an enormous capacity — essentially unlimited — because it holds a snapshot of everything your senses pick up. But here's the key thing: it has an incredibly brief duration. Visual information, called iconic memory, lasts only about half a second. Auditory information, called echoic memory, lasts a little longer — up to about four seconds. And the coding in the SR is modality-specific, meaning visual information is stored as images, auditory information as sounds, and so on. Now, most of what hits your Sensory Register is lost almost immediately. It never makes it any further. The gateway to the next store is attention. If you pay attention to a piece of sensory information — say, you hear your name being called across a noisy room — that information is transferred from the Sensory Register into Short-Term Memory. So let's talk about Short-Term Memory, or STM. This is your working memory in the everyday sense — it's what you're using right now to follow what I'm saying. STM has a very limited capacity. George Miller, in his famous 1956 paper, described it as "the magical number seven, plus or minus two." That means most people can hold between five and nine chunks of information in STM at any one time. And a chunk can be a single digit, a word, or even a meaningful phrase — chunking is a strategy we use to squeeze more into that limited space. Duration in STM is also limited — without rehearsal, information decays in around 18 to 30 seconds. Think about looking up a phone number and then getting distracted before you dial it. Gone. That's STM decay in action. The coding in STM is primarily acoustic — that is, based on sound. Conrad's 1964 research demonstrated this beautifully. He showed that people make more errors when trying to recall letters that sound similar — like B, C, D, P, T — than letters that look similar. This tells us STM is encoding by sound, not by appearance. Now, how does information move from STM to Long-Term Memory? This is where rehearsal comes in, and this is a point that trips up a lot of candidates, so listen carefully. There are two types of rehearsal. Maintenance rehearsal is simply repeating information over and over — like saying a phone number to yourself. This keeps information active in STM but doesn't necessarily transfer it to LTM. Elaborative rehearsal, on the other hand, involves processing information more deeply — linking it to existing knowledge, giving it meaning. This is what actually drives transfer to Long-Term Memory. And what about Long-Term Memory itself? LTM is your vast, permanent store of knowledge, skills, and experiences. Its capacity is considered unlimited — there's no known upper limit to how much the human brain can store. Its duration can last a lifetime — you can remember your first day at school, a childhood holiday, how to ride a bike. The coding in LTM is primarily semantic, meaning it's based on meaning. Baddeley's 1966 research showed that people struggle to recall semantically similar words from LTM — words that mean similar things — which confirms that LTM organises information by meaning. Information can also be retrieved from LTM back into STM — that's the retrieval process. When you're sitting an exam and you recall a study you learned months ago, you're pulling it from LTM back into your conscious working memory in STM. So to summarise the model: environmental stimuli hit the Sensory Register. Attention transfers selected information to STM. Rehearsal — particularly elaborative rehearsal — transfers information to LTM. And retrieval brings it back when needed. It's a neat, elegant model — and that's both its strength and its weakness. --- [EXAM TIPS AND COMMON MISTAKES — approx. 2 minutes] Right, let's talk exam technique, because this is where marks are won and lost. First — the AO1 versus AO3 balance. In a 16-mark essay on the MSM, you're looking at roughly 6 marks for AO1 — that's your description of the model — and 10 marks for AO3, which is your evaluation. A very common mistake is spending too long describing the model and running out of time to evaluate it. Don't do it. Get your description done efficiently and spend the majority of your essay on evaluation. Second — be precise. Examiners will not award full credit for "STM has a capacity of 7." You must say "7 plus or minus 2 chunks, as identified by Miller in 1956." That's the difference between a Level 2 and a Level 3 answer. Third — don't confuse coding, capacity, and duration. Coding is the FORMAT in which information is stored — acoustic, semantic, visual. Capacity is the AMOUNT of information that can be held. Duration is the LENGTH OF TIME information can be held. These are three completely different things and examiners penalise candidates who muddle them. Fourth — when you use case study evidence, explain the dissociation. For HM — Henry Molaison — don't just say "HM supports the MSM." Explain that his hippocampus was removed to treat epilepsy, that his STM remained intact so he could hold conversations, but that his LTM was severely damaged and he could not form new long-term memories. This dissociation between intact STM and damaged LTM supports the MSM's claim that these are separate stores. For KF — studied by Shallice and Warrington in 1970 — his STM was severely impaired with a digit span of just one, yet his LTM remained largely intact. This challenges the MSM because if STM is the gateway to LTM, how could KF form new long-term memories without a functioning STM? This is a powerful evaluative point. Fifth — use the PEEL structure for your evaluation paragraphs. Point — make your evaluative claim. Evidence — name the study, the researcher, the date. Explain — link the evidence back to the MSM. Link — state the implication for the model's validity. --- [QUICK-FIRE RECALL QUIZ — approx. 1 minute] Okay, time for your quick-fire quiz. I'll ask the question, give you a few seconds, then give the answer. Ready? Question one: What is the capacity of Short-Term Memory according to Miller? ... The answer is 7 plus or minus 2 chunks. Question two: What type of coding does STM primarily use? ... Acoustic — based on sound. Question three: Who proposed the Multi-Store Model and in what year? ... Atkinson and Shiffrin, 1968. Question four: What does the primacy effect in Glanzer and Cunitz's 1966 study tell us about LTM? ... Words at the beginning of a list are rehearsed more and transferred to LTM, so they are recalled well — supporting the existence of a separate LTM. Question five: How does KF's case challenge the MSM? ... KF had severely impaired STM but intact LTM, suggesting LTM can function without STM — challenging the model's linear transfer mechanism. --- [SUMMARY AND SIGN-OFF — approx. 1 minute] Let's bring it all together. The Multi-Store Model of Memory, proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin in 1968, describes memory as a linear system with three stores: the Sensory Register, Short-Term Memory, and Long-Term Memory. Each store differs in coding, capacity, and duration. Information moves between stores via attention and rehearsal. The model is supported by the serial position effect — Glanzer and Cunitz, 1966 — and by the case of HM, which demonstrates the dissociation between STM and LTM. However, it is challenged by KF, whose intact LTM despite impaired STM questions the necessity of the rehearsal loop, and by the Working Memory Model, which shows that STM is not a single unitary store but a multi-component system. In your exam, remember: be precise, maintain your AO1 to AO3 ratio, use PEEL for evaluation, and always name your studies with researcher and date. You've got this. Good luck, and I'll see you in the next episode. --- END OF SCRIPT

    Key Terms & Definitions

    Coding
    The format in which information is stored in the various memory stores.
    Capacity
    The amount of information that can be held in a memory store.
    Duration
    The length of time information can be held in a memory store.
    Unitary Store
    A memory store that is seen as a single, homogenous unit without separate components.
    Primacy Effect
    The tendency to recall information presented at the start of a list better than information in the middle.
    Recency Effect
    The tendency to recall information presented at the end of a list better than information in the middle.

    Worked Examples

    Practice Questions

    The Multi-Store Model of Memory

    AQA
    A-Level
    Psychology

    The Multi-Store Model of Memory (MSM), proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin in 1968, is a foundational theory in cognitive psychology. It provides a simple, linear framework for how information is processed from our senses into our permanent memory, making it a crucial topic for understanding how memory works and a frequent subject of exam questions.

    6
    Min Read
    3
    Examples
    5
    Questions
    6
    Key Terms
    🎙 Podcast Episode
    The Multi-Store Model of Memory
    0:00-0:00

    Study Notes

    The Multi-Store Model of Memory - A Linear Journey

    Overview

    The Multi-Store Model of Memory (MSM) is a structural model proposed by Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin in 1968. It describes memory in terms of information flowing through a system of three distinct, unitary stores: the Sensory Register (SR), Short-Term Memory (STM), and Long-Term Memory (LTM). This model was one of the first to present a clear, testable framework for memory, viewing it as an active information processing system, much like a computer. For AQA A-Level Psychology candidates, a precise understanding of this model is essential. Examiners expect candidates to be able to describe the characteristics of each store (coding, capacity, and duration) with accuracy, explain the transfer processes (attention and rehearsal) that move information between the stores, and critically evaluate the model using a range of supporting and refuting evidence. Marks are awarded for demonstrating a clear understanding of the model's linear nature and its limitations, particularly the idea that the stores are unitary.

    Podcast: Mastering the Multi-Store Model

    The Three Stores of Memory

    The Sensory Register (SR)

    • What it is: The first point of contact for all sensory information from the environment. It is not a single store but comprises multiple registers for each sense (e.g., iconic for visual, echoic for auditory).
    • Coding: Modality-specific. Information is stored in the same form it is sensed (e.g., visual information as images).
    • Capacity: Very large, potentially unlimited. It can hold a vast amount of information from our senses at any one time.
    • Duration: Extremely brief. Visual information in the iconic store lasts for about half a second, while auditory information in the echoic store lasts for 2-4 seconds. Information that is not attended to is lost through rapid decay.
    • Transfer: Information passes from the SR to the STM only if attention is paid to it.

    Short-Term Memory (STM)

    • What it is: A temporary store for information currently in conscious awareness. It holds information that we are actively thinking about.
    • Coding: Primarily acoustic. Information is stored based on how it sounds. This was supported by Conrad (1964), who found that participants made more errors recalling acoustically similar letters (e.g., 'B', 'P') than acoustically dissimilar ones.
    • Capacity: Limited. George Miller (1956) famously described the capacity as the 'magical number seven, plus or minus two' (i.e., 5-9 chunks of information). A 'chunk' is a meaningful unit of information.
    • Duration: Limited, typically 18-30 seconds without rehearsal. Peterson & Peterson (1959) demonstrated this by showing that recall of a three-consonant trigram dropped significantly after 18 seconds if participants were prevented from rehearsing.
    • Transfer: Information is kept in STM through maintenance rehearsal (simple repetition). It is transferred to LTM through elaborative rehearsal (linking to existing knowledge).

    Long-Term Memory (LTM)

    • What it is: The potentially permanent memory store for information that has been rehearsed for a prolonged time.
    • Coding: Primarily semantic. Information is stored based on its meaning. Baddeley (1966) found that participants had difficulty recalling semantically similar words from LTM, suggesting that LTM is organised by meaning.
    • Capacity: Functionally unlimited. There is no known limit to the amount of information that can be stored in LTM.
    • Duration: Potentially a lifetime. Some memories can last for an entire lifetime, although they can be lost through decay or interference.
    • Transfer: Information is retrieved from LTM back into STM so that it can be used.

    Flowchart of the Multi-Store Model (Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968)

    Evaluation of the Multi-Store Model

    Supporting Evidence

    • Serial Position Effect: Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) found that when participants were asked to recall a list of words, they tended to remember the first few (the primacy effect) and the last few (the recency effect) best. The primacy effect occurs because the first words have been rehearsed and transferred to LTM, while the recency effect occurs because the last words are still in STM. This supports the idea of separate STM and LTM stores.
      The Serial Position Effect (Glanzer & Cunitz, 1966)
    • Case Study of HM (Henry Molaison): After surgery to treat epilepsy which involved removing his hippocampus, HM was unable to form new long-term memories (anterograde amnesia). However, his short-term memory was largely intact. This dissociation between his damaged LTM and functioning STM provides strong evidence that these are separate and distinct memory stores.

    Refuting Evidence

    • The Model is Too Simplistic: The MSM suggests that both STM and LTM are single, unitary stores. However, evidence suggests this is not the case. The Working Memory Model (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974) shows that STM is a more complex, multi-component system. Similarly, research into LTM has identified different types, such as episodic, semantic, and procedural memory (Tulving, 1972).
    • Case Study of KF: Shallice and Warrington (1970) reported on the case of KF, who suffered brain damage from a motorcycle accident. His STM was severely impaired (digit span of only 1 or 2), but his LTM was largely unaffected. According to the MSM, information must pass through STM to get to LTM, so KF should not have been able to form new long-term memories. This case challenges the linear, sequential nature of the model.
      Key Case Study Evidence: HM vs KF
    • Role of Rehearsal: The MSM emphasizes the role of maintenance rehearsal in transferring information to LTM. However, Craik and Watkins (1973) argued that the type of rehearsal is more important than the amount. Elaborative rehearsal, where information is processed more deeply and linked to existing knowledge, is more effective for LTM storage. This suggests the transfer process is more complex than the MSM suggests.

    Visual Resources

    3 diagrams and illustrations

    Flowchart of the Multi-Store Model (Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968)
    Flowchart of the Multi-Store Model (Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968)
    The Serial Position Effect (Glanzer & Cunitz, 1966)
    The Serial Position Effect (Glanzer & Cunitz, 1966)
    Key Case Study Evidence: HM vs KF
    Key Case Study Evidence: HM vs KF

    Interactive Diagrams

    1 interactive diagram to visualise key concepts

    A simplified flowchart of the Multi-Store Model showing the flow of information between the three stores and the processes of attention, rehearsal, and retrieval.

    Worked Examples

    3 detailed examples with solutions and examiner commentary

    Practice Questions

    Test your understanding — click to reveal model answers

    Q1

    Outline the capacity and duration of the sensory register and short-term memory. (4 marks)

    4 marks
    standard

    Hint: Be precise with the numbers and terminology for each store.

    Q2

    Explain one strength of the Multi-Store Model of Memory. (4 marks)

    4 marks
    standard

    Hint: Use the PEEL structure: Point, Evidence, Explain, Link.

    Q3

    Explain one weakness of the Multi-Store Model of Memory. (4 marks)

    4 marks
    standard

    Hint: Focus on how the model is too simplistic. Use evidence.

    Q4

    Distinguish between maintenance rehearsal and elaborative rehearsal. (3 marks)

    3 marks
    standard

    Hint: Define both and state their different functions according to the MSM.

    Q5

    Using your knowledge of psychology, explain why you are more likely to remember the name of your first pet than the name of a person you were briefly introduced to at a party last night. (6 marks)

    6 marks
    hard

    Hint: Apply the concepts of rehearsal, duration, and the different memory stores to both scenarios.

    Explore this topic further

    View Topic PageAll Psychology Topics

    Key Terms

    Essential vocabulary to know