Paper 3, Option 33: The witch craze in Britain, Europe and North America, c1580–c1750 - 1 The North Berwick witches in Scotland, 1590–91 and the aftermath to 1597 — Edexcel A-Level History
Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.
Paper 3, Option 33: The witch craze in Britain, Europe and North America, c1580–c1750 - 1 The North Berwick witches in Scotland, 1590–91 and the aftermath to 1597 explained
Paper 3, Option 33: The witch craze in Britain, Europe and North America, c1580–c1750 - 1 The North Berwick witches in Scotland, 1590–91 and the aftermath to 1597 covers 3 specification points, including Gilly Duncan's confession; the impact of James… and The case of Agnes Sampson and John Fian; the…. Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.
The origins of the persecution: Gilly Duncan's confession; the impact of James VI’s voyage from Denmark; the extent to which Danish witch hunting influenced events in Scotland.
The North Berwick witch hunt originated from a convergence of local suspicions and international influences. The persecution began when Gilly Duncan, a maid with sudden healing abilities, was tortured by her employer David Seaton. Her subsequent confession implicated others, sparking a wider hunt. Crucially, this escalated due to James VI’s voyage from Denmark in 1589 to collect his bride, Anne. During the journey, severe storms were blamed on witchcraft. In Denmark, James encountered established witch-hunting traditions and theologians who emphasised the demonic pact. The extent to which this Danish influence shaped Scottish events is significant; it transformed local folk magic suspicions into a state-led hunt for a treasonous, demonic conspiracy aimed directly at the King.
The widening net: the case of Agnes Sampson and John Fian; the role of the king and torture; the involvement of the Earl of Bothwell; impact of the confessions, trials and executions.
The North Berwick witch hunt widened from a local dispute into a royal conspiracy because interrogation implicated more people. Agnes Sampson, a respected healer, was arrested and examined before James VI; under torture she confessed to assembling with the Devil and to plotting the king's death by storm at sea. John Fian, a schoolmaster, was accused of leading the coven and was tortured and executed. James personally supervised interrogations, and torture was authorised to extract names, turning suspects into informants. The Earl of Bothwell was named as a conspirator, linking witchcraft to political treason. Confessions, trials and executions spread fear, encouraged further accusations and left a legacy of royal authority over witchcraft.
Reasons for the extent of persecutions in Scotland to 1597, including judicial procedures, lack of strong central control, the role of King James and significance of his Daemonologie.
Persecution in Scotland reached a peak by 1597 because several factors combined. Judicial procedures allowed local courts and commissions to try witchcraft cases, often using torture to secure confessions, which encouraged denunciations. A lack of strong central control meant that local elites, kirk sessions and noblemen could pursue accusations with little oversight, producing uneven but intense outbreaks. King James VI took a personal interest after the North Berwick plot, and his Daemonologie (1597) gave intellectual authority to the belief that witches were a real and dangerous threat. Together, these factors explain why the number of trials and executions grew and spread across Scotland in the 1590s.
Your focus
- Describe the events leading to Gilly Duncan's confession and its role in sparking the North Berwick trials.
- Explain how James VI's voyage from Denmark altered his perception of witchcraft.
- Evaluate the impact of Danish theological ideas on the nature and severity of Scottish witch hunting.
Show all 9 objectives
- Describe the roles of Agnes Sampson and John Fian in the North Berwick witch hunt.
- Explain how King James VI and torture contributed to the widening of the witch hunt.
- Evaluate the significance of the Earl of Bothwell's involvement and the impact of confessions, trials and executions.
- Identify the judicial, political and intellectual reasons for the extent of witch persecutions in Scotland to 1597.
- Explain the role of King James VI and the significance of his Daemonologie.
- Assess how a lack of strong central control contributed to the scale of persecutions.
Paper 3, Option 33: The witch craze in Britain, Europe and North America, c1580–c1750 - 1 The North Berwick witches in Scotland, 1590–91 and the aftermath to 1597 exam tips
Marking Points
- Detail the circumstances of Gilly Duncan's confession, including her torture by David Seaton and the naming of accomplices.
- Explain the significance of the severe storms encountered during James VI's voyage from Denmark and their attribution to witchcraft.
- Evaluate the transmission of continental ideas about the demonic pact from Danish theologians to James VI.
- Assess the extent to which Danish influence escalated the Scottish trials from local disputes to a national crisis involving treason.
- Explains how Agnes Sampson's case widened the net: her status as a cunning woman and her confession under torture implicated others, including John Fian and the Earl of Bothwell.
- Analyses the role of King James VI: his personal involvement in interrogation, his belief in the threat, and his use of torture to obtain confessions and names.
- Assesses the involvement of the Earl of Bothwell: accusations against him turned the witch hunt into a political faction struggle, linking sorcery to treason against the crown.
- Evaluates the impact of confessions, trials and executions: they created a climate of fear, legitimised further accusations, and established a model for later Scottish witch hunts to 1597.
- Uses specific evidence, such as the storm at sea, the assembly at North Berwick kirk, and the fate of John Fian, to support arguments about the widening net.
- Explains how judicial procedures, including the use of torture and local commissions, made it easier to secure convictions and widen accusations.
- Analyses how the lack of strong central control allowed local authorities and kirk sessions to pursue witch hunts with limited royal oversight.
- Assesses the role of King James VI in promoting persecution through his personal involvement and his written work.
- Evaluates the significance of Daemonologie (1597) as a justification for witch hunting and a guide for interrogators.
- Synthesises the factors to explain the extent of persecutions in Scotland to 1597, rather than listing them separately.
Examiner Tips
- 💡When discussing the origins, balance the local trigger (Duncan's confession) with the top-down escalation (James VI's Danish experience).
- 💡Use the concept of 'treason by magic' to explain why James VI took such a personal and intense interest in the North Berwick witches.
- 💡Evaluate the 'extent' of Danish influence by contrasting pre-1590 Scottish witchcraft beliefs with the continental demonic ideas introduced after the voyage.
- 💡Plan your answer around the four clauses: Sampson and Fian, the king and torture, Bothwell, and the impact of confessions, trials and executions.
- 💡Use precise dates and names, such as 1590–91, Agnes Sampson, John Fian and the Earl of Bothwell, to show secure knowledge.
- 💡When discussing impact, distinguish between immediate effects (arrests and executions) and longer-term effects (fear and further hunts to 1597).
- 💡Link each point back to the idea of a 'widening net' to keep your argument focused.
- 💡Structure your answer around the named factors: judicial procedures, lack of strong central control, King James, and Daemonologie.
- 💡Use the phrase 'extent of persecutions' to focus on scale and spread, not just individual cases.
- 💡Refer to specific examples, such as the North Berwick trials and the publication of Daemonologie in 1597, to support your points.
- 💡Make links between factors, for example how Daemonologie reinforced existing judicial practices.
Common Mistakes
- Error: Stating that James VI initiated the witch hunt before his voyage to Denmark. Correction: Clarify that the initial suspicions began locally with Gilly Duncan, and James became heavily involved only after his Danish voyage.
- Error: Assuming Danish witch trials were identical to the subsequent Scottish trials. Correction: Note that while Denmark influenced James regarding demonic pacts, Scottish trials became notably more severe and widespread than contemporary Danish ones.
- Error: Ignoring the role of David Seaton in the origins of the persecution. Correction: Always include Seaton's role in torturing Gilly Duncan as the catalyst for the initial confessions.
- Treating the North Berwick hunt as only a local event: correction — it became a royal and political conspiracy because the king and the Earl of Bothwell were drawn in.
- Assuming torture was routine and unregulated: correction — in Scotland torture required authorisation, and James's personal involvement made it central to this case.
- Confusing Agnes Sampson and John Fian: correction — Sampson was a healer whose confession implicated others; Fian was a schoolmaster accused of leading the coven and was executed.
- Ignoring the political dimension: correction — the naming of Bothwell shows how witchcraft accusations could be used to attack political enemies.
- Treating the lack of central control as simply chaos: correction — it meant local courts and nobles had freedom to act, which could increase persecution.
- Assuming Daemonologie was an official law code: correction — it was a royal treatise that shaped beliefs and gave intellectual support to witch hunting.
- Overstating James's role as the sole cause: correction — judicial procedures and local control were also essential, and James's influence worked alongside them.
- Ignoring the chronology: correction — the peak of persecution to 1597 followed the North Berwick trials and the publication of Daemonologie.