International Relations: the changing international order 1918–1975 - The Cold War in Europe 1945–1961: Rising Tensions — OCR GCSE History
Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.
International Relations: the changing international order 1918–1975 - The Cold War in Europe 1945–1961: Rising Tensions explained
International Relations: the changing international order 1918–1975 - The Cold War in Europe 1945–1961: Rising Tensions covers 5 specification points, including The changing international order after 1945… and Actions of the USSR in Eastern Europe….
Read the full explanation
Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.
The changing international order after 1945 and its consequences
After 1945 the wartime alliance broke down and a new order took shape around two superpowers, the USA and the USSR. Europe divided into a Western bloc tied to the USA through NATO (1949) and an Eastern bloc dominated by the USSR, while Germany and Berlin were split into occupation zones. Outside Europe, decolonisation created new independent states, and conflicts such as Korea (1950–1953) showed the rivalry spreading beyond the continent. The nuclear arms race, with the USA using atomic bombs in 1945 and the USSR testing its own device in 1949, raised the stakes of every confrontation. Consequences include the division of Europe, the formation of rival alliances, proxy wars and a lasting fear of nuclear war. A good answer links each change to a specific consequence rather than listing events loosely.
Actions of the USSR in Eastern Europe 1945–1948 and response of USA and its allies, including conferences at Yalta and Potsdam.
Between 1945 and 1948 the USSR consolidated control over Eastern Europe. Soviet forces occupied much of the region at the end of the war, and communist governments loyal to Moscow were established, often called satellite states. The conferences at Yalta (February 1945) and Potsdam (July–August 1945) set out agreements on the future of Germany and Europe, but growing disagreement, especially over Poland and Germany, widened the split. The USA and its allies responded with containment: the Truman Doctrine (1947) offered support to states resisting communism, and the Marshall Plan (1947) provided economic aid to rebuild Western Europe. These responses deepened the division of Europe. A strong answer links each Soviet action to a specific Western response and shows how the conferences contributed to mistrust.
The division of Germany; the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan; the Berlin Blockade and Airlift.
This topic covers three linked developments in the early Cold War. First, the division of Germany: the wartime Allies split Germany and Berlin into zones, and the Western zones moved towards a separate West German state while the Soviet zone became East Germany. Second, the Truman Doctrine (1947) committed the USA to containing communism by supporting threatened states, and the Marshall Plan (1948) gave economic aid to rebuild Western Europe. Third, the Berlin Blockade (1948–49), when Stalin cut land routes to West Berlin, was answered by the Berlin Airlift, in which Western aircraft supplied the city until the blockade was lifted. Learn what each event was, who acted, and how each raised East–West tension.
Development of NATO and the Warsaw Pact.
This topic covers how two rival military alliances formed in the early Cold War. NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) was set up in 1949 by the USA, Britain, Canada and other Western states, pledging collective defence so that an attack on one member would be treated as an attack on all. When West Germany was brought into NATO in 1955, the Soviet Union responded by forming the Warsaw Pact with its Eastern European satellite states, creating a matching collective-defence alliance. Together the two alliances divided Europe into opposing armed blocs and deepened Cold War tension. Learn the founding year, the leading members and the trigger for each alliance, and how each alliance increased suspicion between East and West.
The building of the Berlin Wall 1961 and its effects on international relations.
This topic asks you to know why the Berlin Wall was built in 1961 and to explain its consequences for relations between the superpowers. Learn the background: after 1945 Germany was divided, and Berlin lay deep inside the Soviet zone but was itself split into sectors. By 1961 around three million East Germans had left for the West, many through Berlin, which weakened the East German state. In August 1961 the East German authorities, with Soviet backing, sealed the border and built the Wall. Study the effects: it stopped the refugee flow, it became a symbol of a divided Europe, and it reduced direct confrontation over Berlin while hardening the division between East and West. Link each cause and effect with clear agents and dates.
Your focus
- Identify the main features of the international order after 1945
- Explain at least one consequence of the breakdown of the wartime alliance
- Distinguish between causes and consequences of Cold War tension
Show all 15 objectives
- Identify key Soviet actions in Eastern Europe between 1945 and 1948
- Explain the significance of the Yalta and Potsdam conferences
- Describe how the USA and its allies responded to Soviet actions
- Identify the division of Germany and Berlin into zones.
- Explain the aims of the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan.
- Describe the Berlin Blockade and how the Airlift responded to it.
- Identify NATO and the Warsaw Pact and their leading members.
- Explain why each alliance was formed and how they responded to each other.
- Describe how the two alliances increased Cold War tension.
- Identify when and by whom the Berlin Wall was built.
- Explain the main causes of its construction.
- Describe its effects on international relations between East and West.
International Relations: the changing international order 1918–1975 - The Cold War in Europe 1945–1961: Rising Tensions exam tips
Marking Points
- Identifies the USA and the USSR as the two dominant superpowers shaping the post-1945 order
- Links the division of Europe to the formation of rival blocs such as NATO and the Soviet-led Warsaw Pact
- Explains that decolonisation produced new independent states that became part of the wider rivalry
- Connects the nuclear arms race to heightened tension and fear of war between the blocs
- Traces a specific consequence, such as the division of Germany and Berlin, back to the breakdown of the wartime alliance
- Describes Soviet actions such as occupying Eastern Europe and installing communist governments loyal to Moscow
- Explains how the Yalta and Potsdam conferences revealed growing disagreement between the Allies
- Links the Truman Doctrine to the American policy of containing communism
- Connects the Marshall Plan to Western efforts to rebuild Europe and resist Soviet influence
- Shows how Soviet actions and Western responses together deepened the division of Europe
- Identifies the division of Germany into Western and Soviet zones, with Berlin also divided, as a key source of early Cold War tension.
- Explains that the Truman Doctrine committed the USA to containing communism by supporting states under threat.
- Describes the Marshall Plan as American economic aid to rebuild Western Europe and reduce the appeal of communism.
- Explains that the Berlin Blockade was Stalin's attempt to force the Western powers out of West Berlin and that the Airlift supplied the city until the blockade ended.
- Identifies NATO as a Western collective-defence alliance founded in 1949 with the USA and other Western states as leading members.
- Explains that NATO's principle of collective defence meant an attack on one member was treated as an attack on all.
- Describes the Warsaw Pact as the Soviet-led alliance formed in 1955 with Eastern European states in response to West Germany joining NATO.
- Explains that the two rival alliances divided Europe into opposing armed blocs and increased Cold War tension.
- Identifies that the Wall was built in August 1961 by the East German authorities with Soviet support.
- Explains that a major cause was the large-scale emigration of East Germans to the West through Berlin.
- Describes an effect on international relations, such as the Wall becoming a symbol of the division of Europe.
- Explains that the Wall reduced the immediate risk of direct superpower confrontation over Berlin while hardening the East–West split.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Read the question stem carefully to see whether it asks for a change, a consequence or both
- 💡Eliminate options that describe events outside the stated period or that confuse causes with consequences
- 💡Where two options seem plausible, choose the one that most directly answers the question asked
- 💡Check the dates in each option against the 1945–1948 period before choosing
- 💡Look for the option that correctly pairs a Soviet action with a Western response
- 💡Reject options that describe events after 1948 as if they belong to this period
- 💡Match each option to one named event and check the date and the actor before choosing.
- 💡Reject options that swap the roles of the USA and the USSR.
- 💡Use the wording of the question to decide whether it asks what happened or why tension rose.
- 💡Check the founding year and the leading power for each alliance before selecting an option.
- 💡Reject options that give the Warsaw Pact Western members or NATO Eastern members.
- 💡Link each alliance to the idea of collective defence when judging an option.
- 💡Learn the key date, August 1961, and the main cause, the refugee flow to the West.
- 💡Practise linking each cause and effect with a clear agent, such as the East German government.
- 💡Use the Wall as a symbol of division when explaining effects on international relations.
Common Mistakes
- Treats the Cold War as a single event rather than a developing rivalry; describe it as a period of tension with distinct phases
- Assumes the USA and USSR fought each other directly; note that rivalry was expressed through alliances, arms races and proxy conflicts
- Ignores the role of decolonisation; include the emergence of new states as part of the changing order
- Dates the start of tension only to 1949; recognise that the breakdown began in the mid-1940s with the division of Europe
- Treats Yalta and Potsdam as identical; distinguish their timing and the changing atmosphere between them
- Assumes the Marshall Plan was purely charitable; explain its political purpose in resisting communism
- Confuses the Truman Doctrine with the Marshall Plan; keep the political and economic responses distinct
- Places Soviet actions outside 1945–1948; keep examples within the stated period
- Confuses the Truman Doctrine with the Marshall Plan; keep the Doctrine as political and military support and the Marshall Plan as economic aid.
- Places the Berlin Blockade before the division of Germany; keep the division of Germany first, then the Doctrine and Plan, then the Blockade and Airlift.
- Treats the Airlift as a Soviet action; keep it as the Western response that supplied West Berlin.
- Reverses the alliances by naming the Warsaw Pact as the Western alliance; keep NATO as Western and the Warsaw Pact as Soviet-led.
- Dates the Warsaw Pact before NATO; keep NATO as 1949 and the Warsaw Pact as 1955.
- Treats the two alliances as friendly cooperation; keep them as rival blocs that deepened suspicion.
- States that the Wall was built by the Western Allies; correct this by naming the East German authorities acting with Soviet backing.
- Confuses the Berlin Wall with the earlier Berlin Blockade of 1948–1949; keep the two events and their dates separate.
- Claims the Wall ended the Cold War; correct this by explaining that it symbolised and hardened division rather than ending it.