Skip to topic
    ← Back to course topics

    2A Buddhism - Section A: Buddhism, gender and sexuality — AQA A-Level Religious Studies

    2A Buddhism - Section A: Buddhism, gender and sexuality explained

    2A Buddhism - Section A: Buddhism, gender and sexuality covers 4 specification points, including Encounter with western lifestyles and values… and The debate leading to the revival of the….

    Read the full explanation

    Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.

    Historical and social factors that have influenced developments in Buddhist thinking about these issues with particular reference to Thailand, including: encounter with western lifestyles and values with the development of tourism after the 1980s; the changing roles of men and women in society outside of religion; the rights given to women by secular Thai governments.

    This topic asks how Thai Buddhism's thinking on gender and sexuality has been shaped by three social and historical pressures. First, tourism expanded sharply after the 1980s, bringing Western lifestyles and values into contact with Thai Buddhist norms and prompting debate about how monks and lay Buddhists should respond. Second, roles of men and women changed in wider Thai society outside religion, for example through greater female participation in education and paid work, which raised questions about women's place in religious life. Third, secular Thai governments have granted women legal rights, and these rights create tension or dialogue with religious custom. A strong answer links each factor to a specific development in Buddhist thinking rather than listing them separately.

    The debate leading to the revival of the Theravada order of nuns in the late 1990s.

    This topic covers the debate that preceded the revival of a Theravada order of nuns in the late 1990s. Learners should understand that the issue concerned whether women could again receive full ordination in the Theravada tradition, which had long lacked a continuous line of nuns. The debate involved arguments about the validity of reviving ordination, the role of supporting monks and existing nuns, and the authority of tradition. A strong answer recognises that the revival was contested and that the late 1990s is the specified period, and it distinguishes the debate from the later outcome. Focus on why the question was disputed and which groups took part, rather than on unrelated Buddhist traditions.

    Continuing debates about female ordination and the role of women in Theravada Buddhism with reference to the work of Dhammananda and the Sakyadhita organisation.

    Theravada Buddhism preserves an order of nuns, the bhikkhuni sangha, whose lineage tradition holds was disrupted, so debates continue about whether women can be fully ordained today. Dhammananda, a Thai scholar and nun, works to restore female ordination in Thailand and became abbess of Songdhammakalyani Monastery, which her mother Voramai Kabilsingh founded. Sakyadhita, the International Association of Buddhist Women, campaigns across traditions for women's ordination, education and equality. Candidates should know the arguments: supporters cite the Buddha's acceptance of women's ordination and the value of equal access to the sangha; opponents cite lineage rules and the authority of the Thai monastic hierarchy. The question asks candidates to explain these continuing debates with reference to both named examples.

    Different Buddhist views about celibacy, marriage and homosexuality and transgender issues.

    This topic asks you to compare how different Buddhist traditions and communities reason about celibacy, marriage, homosexuality and transgender issues. Begin with the shared framework: the Third Precept on sexual misconduct, the monastic rule of celibacy for bhikkhus and bhikkhunis, and the lay ethic of mutual consent, fidelity and non-harm. Then show divergence. Theravada monasticism treats celibacy as a condition of ordination, while many Theravada lay communities accept marriage as a social good. Japanese Pure Land traditions historically allowed married clergy, so celibacy is not universal. On homosexuality, some teachers cite the precept's emphasis on non-harm and consent to argue acceptance, while others appeal to traditional textual norms to counsel restraint. On transgender issues, positions range from welcome in inclusive sanghas to caution grounded in traditional gender roles.

    Your focus

    1. Identify the three named social and historical factors influencing Thai Buddhist thinking on gender and sexuality.
    2. Explain how tourism after the 1980s brought Western lifestyles and values into Thai Buddhist debate.
    3. Relate secular Thai government rights for women to developments in Buddhist thinking.
    Show all 12 objectives
    1. Describe the debate that preceded the revival of the Theravada order of nuns.
    2. Explain why the revival of nuns' ordination was contested in the late 1990s.
    3. Locate the revival within the correct period and tradition.
    4. Explain the continuing debates about female ordination in Theravada Buddhism.
    5. Describe the work of Dhammananda and the Sakyadhita organisation in relation to women's roles.
    6. Evaluate arguments for and against female ordination, reaching a supported judgement.
    7. Explain why celibacy applies to monastics but not all lay Buddhists.
    8. Compare at least two Buddhist traditions' approaches to marriage and homosexuality.
    9. Describe a range of Buddhist responses to transgender issues and the reasoning behind them.

    2A Buddhism - Section A: Buddhism, gender and sexuality exam tips

    Marking Points
    • Identifies tourism after the 1980s as a route by which Western lifestyles and values reached Thailand and influenced Buddhist debate.
    • Explains how changing roles of men and women outside religion prompted reconsideration of women's participation in Buddhist practice.
    • Connects rights granted to women by secular Thai governments with pressure on religious custom and thinking.
    • Distinguishes social and historical factors from purely doctrinal arguments about gender and sexuality.
    • Identifies the late 1990s as the period in which the Theravada order of nuns was revived after debate.
    • Explains that the debate concerned whether women could receive full Theravada ordination again.
    • Recognises that the revival was contested, involving arguments about tradition and the validity of restoring the order.
    • Distinguishes the Theravada debate from ordination developments in other Buddhist traditions.
    • Explains the dispute over female ordination in Theravada Buddhism, including the claim that the bhikkhuni lineage lapsed and the arguments for restoring it.
    • Describes Dhammananda's work for women's ordination in Thailand, noting that she became abbess of Songdhammakalyani Monastery, which her mother Voramai Kabilsingh founded.
    • Describes the role of Sakyadhita as an international organisation campaigning for Buddhist women's ordination, education and equality.
    • Weighs arguments for and against female ordination, such as the Buddha's acceptance of women against lineage and hierarchical authority, and reaches a supported judgement.
    • Identifies the Third Precept on sexual misconduct as a shared reference point for Buddhist sexual ethics.
    • Explains that celibacy is a monastic discipline for bhikkhus and bhikkhunis rather than a universal lay requirement.
    • Contrasts traditions that require clerical celibacy with Japanese Pure Land traditions that permit married clergy.
    • Distinguishes Buddhist views that appeal to non-harm and consent from views that appeal to traditional textual norms.
    • Describes a range of Buddhist positions on transgender issues, from inclusive welcome to traditional caution.
    • Links each stated view to the reasoning or authority a tradition uses to support it.
    Examiner Tips
    • 💡Read the question stem for which factor is named and match the option to that factor precisely.
    • 💡Reject options that describe doctrine only when the question asks about social or historical influence.
    • 💡Check dates and locations in each option against the specification's Thailand and post-1980s scope.
    • 💡Match each option to the specific claim about the debate rather than to general Buddhist history.
    • 💡Check that the option refers to nuns and to Theravada, not to monks or another tradition.
    • 💡Use the date in the stem to eliminate options set in the wrong period.
    • 💡Check the stem for the named figures and organisation, and make sure the answer refers to Dhammananda and Sakyadhita specifically.
    • 💡Distinguish the roles of individuals and organisations so the answer shows who does what.
    • 💡When a question asks about continuing debates, look for the option or answer that presents arguments on both sides rather than a single verdict.
    • 💡Name the tradition or type of teacher behind each view so the contrast is clear.
    • 💡Anchor every position in a principle such as the Third Precept, non-harm or monastic discipline.
    • 💡Use precise terms such as bhikkhu, bhikkhuni, sangha and lay follower correctly.
    • 💡Keep the answer balanced across all four areas: celibacy, marriage, homosexuality and transgender issues.
    Common Mistakes
    • Treats the three factors as identical; separate tourism, changing social roles and secular legal rights and show how each influences Buddhist thinking.
    • Dates the tourism development to a period other than after the 1980s; keep the specified timeframe.
    • Assumes secular legal rights automatically changed monastic rules; explain the tension or dialogue rather than asserting automatic change.
    • Places the revival in a different decade; keep to the late 1990s as specified.
    • Treats the revival as uncontested; recognise that a debate preceded it and identify the disputed issues.
    • Confuses the Theravada order of nuns with orders in other traditions; keep the answer within Theravada.
    • States that Dhammananda founded Songdhammakalyani Monastery; attribute its founding to her mother Voramai Kabilsingh and describe Dhammananda as later abbess.
    • Treats the debate as settled; present it as continuing, with arguments on both sides about lineage and authority.
    • Confuses Sakyadhita with a single monastery or national body; describe it as an international association of Buddhist women.
    • Assumes all Buddhists require celibacy; distinguish monastic vows from lay life and married clergy.
    • Treats Buddhism as a single voice on homosexuality; show that traditions and teachers differ and give the reasoning.
    • Ignores transgender issues because they seem modern; address them using the same precept-based reasoning.
    • Lists labels such as liberal or conservative without explaining the doctrinal basis; connect each view to a principle.