2A Buddhism - Section A: Buddhism, migration and religious pluralism — AQA A-Level Religious Studies
2A Buddhism - Section A: Buddhism, migration and religious pluralism explained
2A Buddhism - Section A: Buddhism, migration and religious pluralism covers 4 specification points, including How migration has created multicultural… and How far Buddhism should be seen as a….
Read the full explanation
Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.
How migration has created multicultural societies which include Buddhism, with particular reference to the development of Buddhism in Britain; diversity within the Buddhist community in Britain; freedom of religion as a human right in European law and religious pluralism as a feature of modern secular states. The influence of this context on Buddhist thought.
This topic links migration to the growth of multicultural societies in which Buddhism is now one religion among many. You need to know how migration helped establish Buddhism in Britain, for example through communities arriving from South and Southeast Asia and through later converts, and to recognise the resulting diversity within British Buddhism, where different traditions and ethnic communities practise side by side. You also need to understand freedom of religion as a human right protected in European law, and religious pluralism as a normal feature of modern secular states where many faiths coexist. Finally, consider how this plural, secular context shapes Buddhist thought: it encourages dialogue, adaptation and reflection on what Buddhism is for. A multiple-choice question will test whether you can match these ideas accurately rather than recall a single fixed fact.
How far Buddhism should be seen as a collection of different traditions with little in common, with reference to two contrasting forms of Buddhism.
This essay asks you to weigh a claim: that Buddhism is really a bundle of traditions sharing little. Build the answer around two contrasting forms you can evidence, for example Theravada and Nichiren Buddhism, and test the claim against shared features and real differences. Shared features to weigh include the Four Noble Truths, the Eightfold Path, the Three Marks of Existence, refuge in the Three Jewels and the authority of the Buddha's teaching. Differences to weigh include the Pali canon versus the Lotus Sutra, the ideal of the arhat versus the bodhisattva, monastic emphasis versus lay practice, and meditation styles. Reach a reasoned judgement rather than listing.
Edict 12 of Ashoka on attitudes to other faiths; Buddhist attitudes to religious pluralism with reference both to diversity within Buddhism and diversity between religions, including the views of Nichiren Buddhism.
This topic covers Ashoka's Edict 12, which urges respect for and restraint towards other religious groups, and wider Buddhist attitudes to pluralism. You need two kinds of diversity: within Buddhism, such as Theravada, Mahayana and Nichiren traditions differing over scripture and practice; and between religions, where Buddhists may stress tolerance, shared ethical values or the distinctiveness of the Dharma. Nichiren Buddhism centres on the Lotus Sutra and chanting the daimoku, and holds its own strong view of true teaching, which you should weigh against simple tolerance. Learn each element accurately so you can select the correct option.
Buddhist responses to issues of freedom of religious expression in society.
This topic asks you to reason from Buddhist principles to a live social question: how far should a society permit religious expression, including expression that some find offensive? Build the answer from doctrine rather than opinion alone. Buddhist teaching on right speech (sammā vācā) in the Eightfold Path values truthful, kindly and timely speech, which supports wide freedom of expression but also sets a responsibility not to wound. The precept on refraining from harmful speech and the emphasis on compassion (karuṇā) and non-harm (ahiṃsā) give a basis for protecting minorities' freedom to practise and speak. Metta, loving-kindness, encourages listening to those of other faiths. Buddhist thought also stresses that attachment to views (diṭṭhi) causes conflict, so humility about one's own opinions supports tolerance.
Your focus
- Describe how migration created multicultural societies that include Buddhism, with reference to Britain.
- Explain freedom of religion as a human right and religious pluralism in modern secular states.
- Assess how this plural context influences Buddhist thought.
Show all 12 objectives
- Compare two contrasting forms of Buddhism using accurate doctrinal and scriptural detail.
- Evaluate the extent to which Buddhism is a collection of traditions with little in common.
- Reach and justify a reasoned conclusion that directly answers the question.
- State the attitude to other faiths expressed in Edict 12 of Ashoka.
- Distinguish diversity within Buddhism from diversity between religions.
- Explain Nichiren Buddhist views and relate them to religious pluralism.
- Explain at least two Buddhist principles relevant to freedom of religious expression.
- Apply Buddhist principles to a concrete social issue of religious expression.
- Reach and justify a reasoned judgement about appropriate limits on expression.
2A Buddhism - Section A: Buddhism, migration and religious pluralism exam tips
Marking Points
- Recognises that migration has brought Buddhist communities into multicultural societies, including Britain, alongside many other religions.
- Identifies diversity within British Buddhism, such as different traditions and communities practising alongside one another.
- Explains freedom of religion as a human right protected in European law.
- Describes religious pluralism as a feature of modern secular states in which many faiths coexist.
- Connects this plural, secular context to its influence on Buddhist thought, such as adaptation and inter-faith dialogue.
- Weighs the claim against shared doctrines such as the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, showing substantial common ground.
- Compares two genuinely contrasting forms, for example Theravada and Nichiren Buddhism, with accurate detail about each.
- Explains differences in scripture, such as the Pali canon against the Lotus Sutra, and links them to the question.
- Assesses whether differences amount to 'little in common' or to variation within a recognisable family of traditions.
- Reaches a sustained, justified conclusion that answers 'how far' rather than merely describing traditions.
- Identifies that Edict 12 of Ashoka promotes respect and restraint towards other faiths rather than coercion.
- Distinguishes diversity within Buddhism, such as Theravada and Mahayana differences, from diversity between religions.
- Explains a Nichiren Buddhist position, including its reliance on the Lotus Sutra, and relates it to pluralism.
- Recognises that Buddhist attitudes to pluralism range from tolerance and shared ethics to claims about distinctive truth.
- Explains right speech (sammā vācā) as truthful, kindly and timely communication that supports freedom of expression while setting a responsibility for how it is used.
- Uses the precept against harmful speech and the principle of non-harm (ahiṃsā) to argue for protecting the freedom of religious minorities to practise and speak.
- Applies compassion (karuṇā) and loving-kindness (metta) to argue for listening respectfully to those of other faiths rather than silencing them.
- Draws on the Buddhist warning about attachment to views (diṭṭhi) to support humility and tolerance of disagreement in a plural society.
- Weighs a legitimate limit, such as restricting speech that incites hatred or violence, against the value of free religious expression and reaches a reasoned judgement.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Read each option against every clause of the statement, since distractors often satisfy one clause but contradict another.
- 💡Distinguish carefully between legal rights (freedom of religion in European law) and social description (pluralism in secular states).
- 💡Eliminate options that describe British Buddhism as monolithic or that deny any effect of context on Buddhist thought.
- 💡Plan two or three shared features and two or three differences before writing, so the comparison is balanced.
- 💡Use precise terms such as arhat, bodhisattva, Pali canon and Lotus Sutra to show accurate knowledge.
- 💡Keep returning to the phrase 'how far' so every paragraph advances the judgement.
- 💡Read the stem carefully to see whether it asks about diversity within Buddhism or between religions.
- 💡Recall the specific content of Edict 12 before choosing an option about Ashoka.
- 💡Link Nichiren views to the Lotus Sutra and daimoku practice to eliminate wrong options.
- 💡Anchor each paragraph in a named Buddhist principle and then apply it directly to a concrete situation of religious expression in society.
- 💡Balance the case for wide freedom against the case for restraint, and state clearly where your judgement falls and why.
- 💡Use precise terms such as sammā vācā, ahiṃsā and karuṇā, and explain each briefly rather than dropping it in unexplained.
Common Mistakes
- Treats British Buddhism as a single uniform community; recognise the diversity of traditions and groups within it.
- Confuses freedom of religion as a legal human right with religious pluralism as a social feature of secular states; keep the two ideas distinct.
- Ignores the final clause about influence on Buddhist thought; remember that the context is said to shape how Buddhists think, not merely where they live.
- Treats the two forms as wholly unrelated and ignores shared doctrines; balance common ground against difference.
- Describes one tradition in detail and mentions the second only in passing; give both forms comparable, accurate coverage.
- Asserts a verdict without weighing evidence; build the judgement from the comparison you have made.
- Confuses diversity within Buddhism with diversity between religions; keep the two categories separate.
- Treats all Buddhist traditions as holding identical views on other religions; note real differences, including Nichiren emphasis.
- Attributes to Edict 12 a demand for conversion; it urges respect and restraint towards other faiths.
- Treats Buddhism as having one official political policy on free speech; recognise instead that the answer reasons from shared principles to a contested social question.
- Lists Buddhist terms without linking them to the issue; connect each term explicitly to freedom or restraint of religious expression.
- Assumes freedom of expression is unlimited in Buddhist reasoning; weigh the harm-based limits that right speech and non-harm imply.